search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
206 Ty J. Prosa and David J. Larson


device structures with a complex thermal diffusivity, encap- sulating finished specimens may improve the mass resolving power of peaks in the mass spectrum, as well as increase the analyzed field of view and is worth further investigation.


SUMMARY


Modern APT has seen tremendous growth during the past decade. Much of this growth has been enabled by advances in FIB-based specimen preparation methodology, as discussed in this review, both in terms of practices and procedures as well as advances in available hardware—instrumentation, manipulation, and specimen holders. The key steps for enabling correlative analysis with tEBSD, TEM, and APT have been discussed. Strategies for preparing specimens for modern microelectronic device structures have been dis- cussed in detail. Even more complex topologies, like those presented by NWs and NPs, have been successfully prepared and analyzed, as shown here. Who knows what the future holds, but developments in new specimen preparation hardware, like cryo-FIB lift-out and the necessary supporting hardware, promise to open a whole new period of specimen preparation development. We eagerly look forward to these developments in the decades to come.


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS


The authors thank all the members of the CAMECA application’s team who contributed to these results, aswell as fruitful discussion, and also acknowledge the many interac- tions with customers and colleagues. Thank you to G. D. W. Smith for providing a perspective on the origins of using the FIB to prepare atom probe tomography specimens.


REFERENCES


AGRAWAL, R., BERNAL, R.A., ISHEIM,D.&ESPINOSA, H.D. (2011). Characterizing atomic composition and dopant distribution in wide band gap semiconductor nanowires using laser-assisted atom probe tomography. J Phys Chem C 115, 17688–17694.


ALEXANDER, K.B., ANGELINI,P. & MILLER, M.K. (1989). Precision ion milling of field-ion specimens. JPhys(Paris), Colloq 50, 549–554.


ARSLAN,I.,MARQUIS,E.A.,HOMER,M.,HEKMATY,M.A.&BARTELT,N.C. (2008). Towards better 3-D reconstructions by combining electron tomography and atom-probe tomography. Ultramicroscopy 108, 1579–1585.


BABINSKY, K., DE KLOE, R., CLEMENS,H.&PRIMIG, S. (2014). A novel approach for site-specific atom probe specimen preparation by focused ion beam and transmission electron backscatter diffraction. Ultramicroscopy 144,9–18.


BABINSKY, K., KNABL, W., LORICH, A., DE KLOE, R., CLEMENS,H.& PRIMIG, S. (2015). Grain boundary study of technically pure molybdenum by combining APT and TKD. Ultramicroscopy 159, (Pt 2), 445–451.


BIRDSEYE, P.J., SMITH, D.A. & SMITH, G.D.W. (1974). Analogue investigations of electric field distribution and ion trajectories in the field ion microscope. J Phys D 7, 1642–1651.


BLUMTRITT, H., ISHEIM, D., SENZ, S., SEIDMAN, D.N. & MOUTANABBIR, O. (2014). Preparation of nanowire specimens for laser-assisted atom probe tomography. Nanotechnology 25, 435704.


BRAN, J., JEAN, M., LARDÉ, R., SAUVAGE, X., BRETON, J.-M.L. & PAUTRAT, A. (2013). Elaboration and characterization of Cu/Co multilayered nanowires. J Korean Phys Soc 62, 1744–1747.


CHEN, Y., RICE, K.P., PROSA, T.J.,MARQUIS, E.A. & REED, R.C. (2015). Integrated APT/t-EBSD for grain boundary analysis of thermally grown oxide on a Ni-based superalloy. Microsc Microanal 21, 687–688.


CHEN, Y., RICE, K.R. & PROSA, T.J. (2016). Site-specific sample preparation using correlative microscopy: APT and tEBSD. Microsc Anal Suppl May/June (S4).


COJOCARU-MIRÉDIN, O., PYUCK-PA, C., ABOU-RAS, D., SCHMIDT, S.S., CABALLERO,R.&RAABE, D. (2011). Characterization of grain boundaries in Cu(In,Ga)Se films using atom-probe tomography. IEEE J Photovolt 1, 207–212.


DIERCKS, D.R., GORMAN, B.P. & MULDERS, J.J.L. (in submission). Electron beam induced deposition for atom probe tomography specimen capping layers. Microsc Microanal. doi:10.1017/ S1431927616011740.


DIERCKS,D.R., TONG,J., ZHU,H.,KEE,R., BAURE,G.,NINO, J.C.,O’HAYRE, R. & GORMAN, B.P. (2016). Three-dimensional quantification of composition and electrostatic potential at individual grain boundaries in doped ceria. JMater Chem A 4,5167–5175.


EATON, H.C. & BAYUZICK, R.J. (1978). Field-induced stresses in field emitters. Surf Sci 70, 408–426.


EICHFELD, C.M., GERSTL, S.S.A., PROSA, T., KE, Y., REDWING, J.M. & MOHNEY, S.E. (2012). Local electrode atom probe analysis of silicon nanowires grown with an aluminum catalyst. Nanotechnology 23, 215205.


EL KOUSSEIFI, M., PANCIERA, F., HOUMMADA, K., DESCOINS, M., BARON,T. & MANGELINCK, D. (2014). Ni silicide nanowires analysis by atom probe tomography. Microelectron Eng 120,47–51.


ESTIVILL, R., AUDOIT, G., BARNES, J.-P., GRENIER,A.&BLAVETTE,D. (2016). Preparation and analysis of atom probe tips by xenon focused ion beam milling. Microsc Microanal 22, 576–582.


FELFER,P., ALAM,T., RINGER,S.P.&CAIRNEY, J.M. (2012). A reproducible method for damage-free site-specificpreparation of atom probe tips from interfaces. Microsc Res Tech 75, 484–491.


FELFER,P., BENNDORF,P.,MASTERS,A.,MASCHMEYER,T.&CAIRNEY,J.M. (2014). Revealing the distribution of the atoms within individual bimetallic catalyst nanoparticles. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 53, 11190–11193.


FELFER,P.&CAIRNEY, J. (2011a). New equipment for correlative FIB/ TEM/atom probe and site-specific preparation using STEM live imaging. Microsc Microanal 17(S2), 756–757.


FELFER, P., LI, T., EDER, K., GALINSKI, H., MAGYAR, A.P., BELL, D.C., SMITH, G.D.W., KRUSE, N., RINGER, S.P. & CAIRNEY, J.M. (2015). New approaches to nanoparticle sample fabrication for atom probe tomography. Ultramicroscopy 159(Pt 2), 413–419.


FELFER, P., RINGER, S.P. & CAIRNEY, J.M. (2011b). Shaping the lens of the atom probe: Fabrication of site specific, oriented specimens and application to grain boundary analysis. Ultramicroscopy 111, 435–439.


FOLCKE, E., LARDE, R., LE BRETON, J.M., GRUBER, M., VURPILLOT, F., SHIELD, J.E., RUI,X. & PATTERSON, M.M. (2012). Laser-assisted atom probe tomography investigation of magnetic FePt nanoclusters: First experiments. J Alloy Compd 517,40–44.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212  |  Page 213  |  Page 214  |  Page 215  |  Page 216  |  Page 217  |  Page 218  |  Page 219  |  Page 220  |  Page 221  |  Page 222  |  Page 223  |  Page 224  |  Page 225  |  Page 226  |  Page 227  |  Page 228  |  Page 229  |  Page 230  |  Page 231  |  Page 232  |  Page 233  |  Page 234  |  Page 235  |  Page 236  |  Page 237  |  Page 238  |  Page 239  |  Page 240  |  Page 241  |  Page 242  |  Page 243  |  Page 244  |  Page 245  |  Page 246  |  Page 247  |  Page 248  |  Page 249  |  Page 250  |  Page 251  |  Page 252  |  Page 253  |  Page 254  |  Page 255  |  Page 256  |  Page 257  |  Page 258  |  Page 259  |  Page 260  |  Page 261  |  Page 262  |  Page 263  |  Page 264  |  Page 265  |  Page 266  |  Page 267  |  Page 268  |  Page 269  |  Page 270  |  Page 271  |  Page 272  |  Page 273  |  Page 274  |  Page 275  |  Page 276  |  Page 277  |  Page 278  |  Page 279  |  Page 280  |  Page 281  |  Page 282  |  Page 283  |  Page 284