422 Stella Pedrazzini et al.
field evaporation of the specimen. For example, the promi- nent diagonal lines can be explained by the delayed eva- poration of both ions with respect to the application of the laser pulse. These plots can also be used to identify mid-flight ion dissociation events, some of which can potentially lead to the systematic “loss” of chemical species (Saxey, 2011). This technique was first pioneered by Saxey in (2011) on GaN samples in a LEAP 3000X Si, where the atoms are ionized, leave the tip of the sample and follow a straight flight path directly to the detector. The present work was, however, performed on a LEAP 3000X HR equipped with a reflectron
lens, which improves mass resolution by deflecting the ion flight path differently according to their kinetic energy. Figure 7b shows the different ways in which ion dissociation is visible in a reflectron atom probe, when compared with a straight flight path atom probe on the same GaN sample. When the ions are deflected through a reflectron lens, the full ion dissociation track is no longer visible, and is replaced by an ellipsoidal trace with negative slope. Ellipsoidal traces with negative slope are visible in the
YBCO data shown in Figure 7a, and are indicative of mid- flight ion dissociation (highlighted by the arrows). This is
because the time that it takes daughter ions of the dissocia- tion to reach the detector is either increased or reduced, because of the time spent in flight in the early stages of their trajectories as part of a larger complex ion with a different overall mass-to-charge-state. Generally, the daughter ion with smaller mass-to-charge-state will arrive later than expected. Hence, the mass-to-charge-state ratio measured in the APT experiment for these ions will be distorted to larger values. The opposite is true for the daughter ion with the larger mass-to-charge-state ratio. Figure 7 provides possible evidence for dissociation occurring more at the lowest laser energies, as expected as the applied voltage is higher and, therefore, the local field at the specimen tip is greater and the number of multiple events is higher (as shown in Fig. 6). For instance, the mass-to-charge state value of the multiple events suggests that the molecular ion Cu2O2+ dissociates into CuO+ and Cu+, but neither of those ions would be lost as they are both charged. No other ion dissociation events were evident from the correlation histograms. This suggests that the loss of individual species due to ion dissociation should not be a problem in the present analysis.
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
The present study has proved that APT can be used to measure chemical compositions (and in particular oxygen stoichiometry) in the superconducting perovskite YBCO, though the interpretation of the results requires a detailed and systematic standardization of the experimental para- meters. Ion identification and range widths proved to have a substantial effect on chemical composition, and the use of full-width-half-maximum ranges were found to be most accurate in the present work. Decreasing the laser energy was shown to improve the mass resolution by decreasing thermal “tails” in the mass
spectra and improving the visibility of smaller peaks. Due to the improvement in mass resolution, the oxygen and copper content could be measured more accurately. There is however a trade-off: mass resolution is improved with
decreasing laser energy but, likely due to its low evaporation field, some evidence suggests that Ba could be evaporating off-pulse. The barium content was therefore more accurate at higher laser energies. The reduced detectability of Ba due to off-pulse evaporation artificially inflates themeasured content of the other elements, when expressed in units of at%. It is also noteworthy that the number of multiple events
increased with decreasing laser energy, which increases the uncertainty of the measurement. An intermediate value of 0.3–0.4 nJ is therefore suggested for the study of YBCO. The detection loss of neutral species due to complex ion dissociation was not observed to be an issue at any of the laser energies tested. Background corrections were required due to the insu-
lating nature of the sample, which caused field evaporation to continue even after the laser pulse, translating in the mass- to-charge state spectrum as thermal “tails” extending from the peaks. The thermal tails were fitted to exponentially decaying functions which were then subtracted from overlapping peaks. The final measured composition obtained was
Y7.9Ba10.4Cu24.4O57.2 at%. For data sets exceeding 1M ions the counting error should be small enough to allow the composition to be accurate within ±0.01 at%. This opens up new prospects for studying the local chemistry of nanoscale defects created by radiation damage, and explaining their influence on the superconducting properties.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Dr. Daniel Haley is gratefully acknowledged for helping with a part of the Matlab script and the C++ programused in the present work. Dr. Tayebeh Mousavi is gratefully acknowl- edged for performing the superconductivity measurements. Funding is acknowledged from the UK’s Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) under grant EP/K029770/1. PDE also acknowledges support from the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Fusion Energy Sciences. The authors also thank the Bulk Superconductivity Group in the University of Cambridge for providing the samples which were used in the present study.
REFERENCES
BABU, N.H., JACKSON, K.P., DENNIS, A.R., SHI, Y.H., MANCINI, C., CARDWELL, D.A. & DURRELL, J.H. (2012). Growth of large size Y1Ba2Cu3O7 single crystals using the Top Seeded Melt Growth process. Supercond Sci Technol 25(7), 75012.
BACHHAV, M., DANOIX, F., HANNOYER, B., BASSAT, J.-M. & DANOIX,R. (2013). Investigation of O-18 enriched hematite (α-Fe2 O3)by laser assisted atom probe tomography. Int J Mass Spectrom 335, 57–60.
BADWAL, S.P.S., GIDDEY, S., MUNNINGS,C.&KULKARNI, A. (2014). Review of progress in high temperature solid oxide fuel cells. J Aust Ceram Soc 50(1), 23–37.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180 |
Page 181 |
Page 182 |
Page 183 |
Page 184 |
Page 185 |
Page 186 |
Page 187 |
Page 188 |
Page 189 |
Page 190 |
Page 191 |
Page 192 |
Page 193 |
Page 194 |
Page 195 |
Page 196 |
Page 197 |
Page 198 |
Page 199 |
Page 200 |
Page 201 |
Page 202 |
Page 203 |
Page 204 |
Page 205 |
Page 206 |
Page 207 |
Page 208 |
Page 209 |
Page 210 |
Page 211 |
Page 212 |
Page 213 |
Page 214 |
Page 215 |
Page 216 |
Page 217 |
Page 218 |
Page 219 |
Page 220 |
Page 221 |
Page 222 |
Page 223 |
Page 224 |
Page 225 |
Page 226 |
Page 227 |
Page 228 |
Page 229 |
Page 230 |
Page 231 |
Page 232 |
Page 233 |
Page 234 |
Page 235 |
Page 236 |
Page 237 |
Page 238 |
Page 239 |
Page 240 |
Page 241 |
Page 242 |
Page 243 |
Page 244 |
Page 245 |
Page 246 |
Page 247 |
Page 248 |
Page 249 |
Page 250 |
Page 251 |
Page 252 |
Page 253 |
Page 254 |
Page 255 |
Page 256 |
Page 257 |
Page 258 |
Page 259 |
Page 260 |
Page 261 |
Page 262 |
Page 263 |
Page 264 |
Page 265 |
Page 266 |
Page 267 |
Page 268 |
Page 269 |
Page 270 |
Page 271 |
Page 272 |
Page 273 |
Page 274 |
Page 275 |
Page 276 |
Page 277 |
Page 278 |
Page 279 |
Page 280 |
Page 281 |
Page 282 |
Page 283 |
Page 284