search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
386 B. Langelier et al.


Table 1. Solute Compositions of Experimental Alloys Before Decarburizing or Denitriding, Given in at% (wt%).


Alloy Designation Mn Fe–Mn–C


Fe–Mn–N 1.42 (1.43)


N –


1.43 (1.43) 2.08 (0.53) C Fe


2.73 (0.60) Balance –


APT specimens were prepared using either of two


methods: focused ion beam (FIB) liftout or electropolishing. FIB-prepared specimens were made by a standard liftout procedure (Thompson et al., 2007; Felfer et al., 2011) using a Zeiss NVision 40 (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) dual-beam FIB scanning electron microscope (SEM). Specimens were protected by W deposition and extraction. As the transfor- mation interface typically runs perpendicular to the sample surface, liftouts would be rotated ~90°, then mounted to pre-sharpened Si or W posts. This step would orient the transformation interface approximately normal to the final tip axis, as shown by the Fe–Mn–N specimen before annular milling, depicted in Figure 1b. Specimens were annularmilled with a 30 kVGa ion beam, at a probe currents of 150, down to 40pA. Final sharpening of the needles was performed using a defocused Ga ion beam at 10 kV and 80pA. Additional details on the FIB liftout and sample rotation procedures, and how the transformation interface is tracked during sample preparation, are provided in the Supplementary Section 2. When site-specific analysiswas not required (e.g., analysis


of interfaces), specimen preparation could be performed by electropolishing. This was conducted by first mechanically grinding sections of the alloy into pillars, ~0.50×0.50×10mm in dimensions. These pillars were subsequentlymade into fine nano-tipped needles by electropolishing in two stages, similar


a


to the procedures described by Miller (2000) and Gault et al. (2012b). The first stage was done by repeatedly dipping one end of the pillar intro a solution of 25% perchloric acid (70%) in glacial acetic acid at 20V-DC until a point was formed. The point was then refined by the second stage of electro- polishing, which used an electrolyte of 2% perchloric acid in 2-butoxyethanol and a potential of 15–20 V-DC. BeforeAPTexamination, several specimens were imaged by


transmission electron microscopy (TEM), using a JEOL 2010F microscope(JEOL Ltd.,Tokyo,Japan)at200kV.Such animage for a FIB-prepared Fe–Mn–N sample is shown in Figure 1c. APT testing was performed using a CAMECA local


electrode atom probe (LEAP, CAMECA Instruments Inc., Madison, WI, USA) 4000X HR. Testing was performed at a stage temperature of ~43K and under ultrahigh vacuum (~3.0×10−11Torr). Evaporation was induced either by laser pulsing (LP) or voltage pulsing (VP).WithVP, a pulse fraction of 20% and a pulse rate of 200kHz was used. With LP, a UV (λ=355nm) laser was used at 50 pJ pulse energy (unless otherwise specified) and a 250kHz pulse rate. Evaporation was set to a target rate of 0.005 ions/pulse (0.5%).AllAPT data was reconstructed using the Integrated Visualization and Analysis Software package (IVAS) v3.6.12 and established algorithms.


RESULTS AND DISCUSSION


Fe–Mn–C and Fe–Mn–N Ferrite Growth Interfaces APT analysis of Fe–Mn–C and Fe–Mn–N ferrite growth interfaces, successfully conducted on several samples, yields consistent results. In targeting the ferrite growth interface to be within the APT analysis volume, site-specific sample preparation via FIB was required for all interface samples.


b FM


F M


100 µm c F M


500 nm d


50 nm


50 nm


Figure 1. SEM micrographs of Fe-Mn-N alloy, showing (a) ferrite (F) and martensite (M) regions in the denitrided sample and (b) a cross-section from a FIB liftout, which contains the interface. c: Bright-field TEM micrograph of a typi- cal FIB-sharpened APT needle, containing the ferrite-martensite interface, and (d) the same TEM micrograph including an overlay of the reconstructed APT volume (Fe atom density map). The interface is indicated by arrows in (b-d).


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212  |  Page 213  |  Page 214  |  Page 215  |  Page 216  |  Page 217  |  Page 218  |  Page 219  |  Page 220  |  Page 221  |  Page 222  |  Page 223  |  Page 224  |  Page 225  |  Page 226  |  Page 227  |  Page 228  |  Page 229  |  Page 230  |  Page 231  |  Page 232  |  Page 233  |  Page 234  |  Page 235  |  Page 236  |  Page 237  |  Page 238  |  Page 239  |  Page 240  |  Page 241  |  Page 242  |  Page 243  |  Page 244  |  Page 245  |  Page 246  |  Page 247  |  Page 248  |  Page 249  |  Page 250  |  Page 251  |  Page 252  |  Page 253  |  Page 254  |  Page 255  |  Page 256  |  Page 257  |  Page 258  |  Page 259  |  Page 260  |  Page 261  |  Page 262  |  Page 263  |  Page 264  |  Page 265  |  Page 266  |  Page 267  |  Page 268  |  Page 269  |  Page 270  |  Page 271  |  Page 272  |  Page 273  |  Page 274  |  Page 275  |  Page 276  |  Page 277  |  Page 278  |  Page 279  |  Page 280  |  Page 281  |  Page 282  |  Page 283  |  Page 284