search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
398 Torben Boll et al.


closer to the stoichiometric value. The laser pulse energy was typically 200 pJ for the LEAP 3000 and 20 pJ for the LEAP 4000. The laser of the LEAP 4000 has a smaller focal point, which allows lower pulse energies. Pulse frequencies between 100 and 250 kHz were used depending on the applied voltage to avoid a mass cutoff below 300 Da. For the APT reconstructions with IVAS 3.6.12 we used SEM images, if possible. Otherwise the reconstruction was based on the reconstruction parameters (evaporation field of 25.6 V/nm, image compression factor of 1.65, k-factor of 3.3) obtained for a reference measurement of pure alumina at 25K with 20 pJ in the LEAP 4000, in which plane distances could be identified by using cross-correlated spatial distribution maps (SDM) (Boll et al., 2012), which the paper refers to as AtomVicinity (Boll et al., 2007), an algorithm almost identical to SDM (Geiser et al., 2007).


RESULTS


Figure 1 is a STEM-HAADF micrograph showing the oxide structure typical for all the investigated samples. It consists of α-alumina grains that form a protective layer on top of the bright imagingmetal. The grains are elongated in their growth direction, i.e., perpendicular to the metal surface. They are typically about 2 µmhighand 1 µmwide.Ontop of this region, a more finely grained region with equiaxed oxide is visible. This part of the scale originates from the oxide formed during initial oxidation and has been transformed during subsequent exposure. It consists of a mixture of alumina and spinel grains. The region also contains dark imaging voids and bright imaging small precipitates of heavy metal (Y or Hf) oxides. Acquisition of APT data from the oxidized samples


proved to be difficult. Although α-alumina itself runs quite well and measurements with several 100 millions of collected atoms were easily attainable, the successes rate of analysis of the specimens containing oxide phase or GBs was below 25% due to the early specimen fracture. Furthermore, it appeared that premature fractures of the specimens containing the outermost part of the oxide were more frequent than for the specimens containing the inner parts. This was most probably due to the presence of voids at this part of the oxide (see Fig. 1). On the other hand, it was more difficult to prepare samples containing oxide GBs in the inner part of the oxide as the oxide grain size is larger there. Initially analyses were performed at 60K, which gave a


reduces the differences in evaporation fields, the local magni- fication effect and possible surface migration of elements like B or C, the majority of experiments was performed at 25K.


APT Mass Spectra


The APT mass spectra collected with the LEAP 4000 are typically easier to interpret, showing smaller peak tails (Fig. 2). Concerning Hf-molecules, the spectrum is also much simpler. However, usually more hydrides were


composition of α-alumina much closer to the stoichiometric value than the 25K runs. However, as the lower temperature


observed in the measurements, which counteracted this positive effect to some extent. The higher number of peaks leads to a situation where more tails overlap. This makes it effectively more complicated to give an exact value for the Cr and Ni concentration by deconvolution of the peaks. We decided to give these values of the oxide matrix composition as an upper limit as it is known that the solubility of alloying elements in α-alumina is extremely low (Kofstad, 1966). Generally, nonmolecular Hf is rarely detected, instead it


usually field evaporates as molecular HfO+/2+/3+ ions and to some extent as more complex oxide molecules like HfO2 or Hf2O. This results in overlaps with Pt for 3 out of 4 of the significant isotopes, especially for the 2+ state at 97, 97.5, and 98 Da. This is problematic only when plotting the Hf signal close to the protective Pt cap deposited during specimen preparation by FIB. Y has only one significant isotope, for Y2+ a peak is found at 44.5 Da that unfortunately is located in the thermal tail of AlO, which induces a high noise level in the corresponding atom maps. The only other significant peak found is YO2+ at 54.5 Da. Nonmolecular B can be easily identified, but most of themore complex ions show overlaps. Apossible BO+ main peak overlaps with Al at 27 Da, BO2


+


would overlap likewise with AlO at 43 Da. There are also overlaps of the second highest BO+ peak at 26 Da with Cr. As there was no peak for mono-atomic B present, we think it is unlikely that these overlaps are relevant. Ti and its oxides have a typical pattern of five isotopes, which would be easy to recognize, if present. The possible presence of an extremely small number of atoms that do not show up as a peak in the mass spectrum, was considered by looking at the distribution of the atoms at the peak positions. No indication of enrich- ment in GBs or phase boundaries was found for B or Ti.


The Outermost Part of the Oxide Scale (YHf-Sample)


For the reasons described above, the outer oxide’s surface was successfully analyzed only in a YHf-sample (Fig. 3) below the protective Au-capping deposited on the sample surface. The local magnification effects, expected from the high evaporation field of Au, were successfully reduced using 25K during analyses. APT revealed many more features compared to STEM


analysis such as small, <5 nm in diameter, Ni-rich grains observed at the very topmost oxide layer, i.e., below the Au-cap (Figs. 4b–4d). The grains were only found on a small fraction of the surface, accounting for about 30%of the area of the APT measurement when viewed fromthe top. They were surrounded by a Ni-rich spinel containing aluminum. Some enrichment of C and maybe Cr could be found in or around some of these particles (Fig. 4d). Using the isosurface of 32 at % Ni as the boundary of the particles their average composi- tion is Ni48.8Al17.0Cr1.4C1.1Hf0.3O31.3. The compositions are also given in Table 1. The area around this region 1 in Figure 4 has a composition of Ni16.6Al32.3Cr0.8C0.3Hf0.2O49.8.Below region 1, one finds in region 2 a composition of Ni17.2Al30.7 Cr0.3Y0.1Hf0.1O51.6. There are two kinds of GBs between


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212  |  Page 213  |  Page 214  |  Page 215  |  Page 216  |  Page 217  |  Page 218  |  Page 219  |  Page 220  |  Page 221  |  Page 222  |  Page 223  |  Page 224  |  Page 225  |  Page 226  |  Page 227  |  Page 228  |  Page 229  |  Page 230  |  Page 231  |  Page 232  |  Page 233  |  Page 234  |  Page 235  |  Page 236  |  Page 237  |  Page 238  |  Page 239  |  Page 240  |  Page 241  |  Page 242  |  Page 243  |  Page 244  |  Page 245  |  Page 246  |  Page 247  |  Page 248  |  Page 249  |  Page 250  |  Page 251  |  Page 252  |  Page 253  |  Page 254  |  Page 255  |  Page 256  |  Page 257  |  Page 258  |  Page 259  |  Page 260  |  Page 261  |  Page 262  |  Page 263  |  Page 264  |  Page 265  |  Page 266  |  Page 267  |  Page 268  |  Page 269  |  Page 270  |  Page 271  |  Page 272  |  Page 273  |  Page 274  |  Page 275  |  Page 276  |  Page 277  |  Page 278  |  Page 279  |  Page 280  |  Page 281  |  Page 282  |  Page 283  |  Page 284