search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Menno Menist, director of business development at the consultancy company Panteia. Photo Menno Menist


Infrastructure challenges: the chicken- and-egg dilemma of the green corridor


Achieving zero-emission inland navigation with an electric drive that is powered by green hydrogen, fuel cells and batteries is extremely complicated and requires large financial investments. Are ship owners willing to pay double for a technically complicated hydrogen drive if they are not sure that they can bunker green hydrogen at the destination port?


Why should ports invest in time-consuming licensing procedures, expensive storage and handling facilities and in training additional staff if there are no barges using their services? In short, who takes the first step; ship owners, port authorities or green hydrogen producers to create the envisaged green corridor along the Rhine?


Policy “This dilemma was the reason for starting RH₂INE”, says Menno Menist, director of business development at the consultancy company Panteia in Zoetermeer. He was among the initiators of the RH₂INE project five years ago. The EU’s climate targets require inland navigation to be emission-free by 2050. “At the time, we thought the best way to achieve this was with green hydrogen and fuel cells. We knew, however, that the inland navigation sector could never be able to shoulder the transition on its own. We thus needed to get all stakeholders on board to turn one single idea on one single corridor into reality. Governments had to take the lead to develop and finance solutions together with key industry players”, Menist says.


Urgency Much has been achieved in the past five years, but the pace needs to pick up, according to Menist. Compared to road transport, the greening of inland navigation proceeds too slowly. “The modal shift is rapidly shifting in favour of road transport. This trend must be stopped, because it is a disaster for the climate and for our


26 • RH2INE


prosperity.” He observes, with great concern, that the importance of inland navigation for the western European economy is seriously underestimated, not least in Germany.


Menno Menist Governments should take


the lead to develop and fund solutions with key industry players


Menist might sound a bit over-dramatic when he refers to the year 2018, when a long period of low water on the waterways prevented barges from transporting petrol to the northern Netherlands or commodities to the chemical plants in Ludwigshafen: “How long will big chemical companies stay along the Rhine if they don’t get their raw materials delivered? If a Bayer or a BASF disappears from the region, a lot of other companies will disappear as well, right down to local bakeries. In short: if we lose inland navigation, we will see our prosperity disappear.”


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144