search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
96 SILICONES


Table 5: Analysis of moisturiser Property


Viscosity (cps)* pH


Appearance


Stability RT/45C Feel


Compatibility Conclusion


FC368 10,000


6.23


White Cream Stable/stable Very Good Good


Very Good


*Brookfield Synchro-Lectric Viscometer LVF Spindle #4, 12 rpm, at 25 °C


substantive to skin. This is due to the fact that the skin has a net negative charge because of the oxidised sulfur containing amino acids. In this case we replaced the non-ionic. The formulation is shown in Table 4. Table 5 shows the analytical data on


formulation FC368. This formulation also contained the additives found to be effective in the non-ionic formulation to make a truly multifunctional product.


Sensory feel Table 6 shows the sensory evaluation of all the formulations tested. The sensory evaluation for all formulations is presented in graphic form in Figure 2.


Conclusion


Alkyl silicones can be oil soluble, and that these silicones alter the oil air or oil water interface, lowering surface tension and forming self- assembling units has been known for many years.8,9


The fact that not just oils, but emulsifiers can alter sensory properties of cosmetic products has likewise been known for many years.5,6 Alkyl silicones added to oils in which they


are soluble and will form gels when cooled has also been known since 2007.10


It is now understood that other surface active polymers notably alkyl silicones are able to alter sensory properties of oils, just like emulsifiers (Wiechers) and oil selection (Herman). The addition of a variety of raw materials at low concentrations will potentially have a large effect upon the aesthetics of the finished formulation. These changes are achieved by altering the physical properties of the surface. The differences are many times not immediately predictable since there are many interactions between raw materials in the non-modified formulation that will change when a surface-active additive is included in the formulation. Viscosity, rheology, surface tension, wetting and solubility all can change with the minimally disruptive approach. The formulator is encouraged to try different additives to the oil phase, water phase or both to


PERSONAL CARE EUROPE


Table 6: Sensory Feel Evaluation of FC 367 Series and FC368 Sensory


Parameters*


Before Absorption: wetness


spreadability no tackiness absorbency


After Absorption: gloss


film residue no greasiness silkiness


no tackiness softness Total


*1 ~ 10, 10 is the best FC367 7


8.5 7 5


5 6


8.5 5 6


6.5 64.5 FC367A FC367B FC367C FC367D FC368


8.3 9


8.5 8


7.5 7.5 9.2 9.0 9.0 9.0


85.0


8 9


8.5 7.5


7.5 7.0 9.2 8.5 8.5 9.0


82.7


8 9


8.5 7.5


7


7.5 9.2 8.6 8.5 9.2


83.0


8 9


8.5 8


7.5 7.5 9.2 8.8 8.8 8.8


84.1 9


9.5 9.2 9.3


8


8.5 9.5 9.3 9.2 9.5 91


FC368 FC367 D FC367 C FC367 B FC367 A Control 50.0 55.0 60.0 65.0 70.0 75.0 80.0 85.0 90.0 95.0  Total Sensory Score Figure 2: Sensory modification (all formulations).


understand the effect of an ingredient added in low concentrations to the final product. It will not only provide outstanding formulations; it will be able to be done more rapidly as the effect of additives becomes better known.


PC


References 1 O’Lenick T, Zhang D. Developing minimally disruptive formulations, Personal Care Magazine 2015; 8(4): 57-59.


2 O’Lenick T. Household and Personal Care Today 2016; 11(2).


3 https://tinyurl.com/y79xan37 4 Herman S: https://www.skininc.com/ skinscience /physiology/12605626.html


5 Wiechers J, Taelman M-C, Wortel V, Verboom C, Dederen C. Emollients and Emulsifiers Exert


their Sensory Impact in Different phases of the Sensory Evaluation process but How Does One Demonstrate the Absence of such an Influence? IFSCC Magazine 2002; 5(2):99-105


6 Chandler M. The importance of sensory in topical pharmaceutical products, Chimica Oggi - Chemistry Today 2013; 31(5)


7 http://www.brookfield.nl/fileadmin/assets- brookfield/documents/handleidingen/Analoog _manual.pdf


8 O’Lenick T. Comparatively Speaking Surfactant vs. Silicone Surfactant October 2008. https://www.cosmeticsandtoiletries.com/formulatin g/function/surfactant/8815207.html


9 https://tinyurl.com/y8wmg6y6 10 O’Lenick Kevin. U.S. Patent 7,875,263 entitled Polymeric Structures Gels, issued Jan. 2011, filed Feb 2007.


April 2019


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188