search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
42 TESTING


invasion of foreign and potentially harmful microbes. Other articles examine the communication of the microbiome with the human immune system. Many studies have proven that there is a close link between skin diseases such as acne and atopic dermatitis and the skin microbiome. Recent research indicates that no presence of a single clearly defined microbial species will turn out beneficial or harmful, but that it is the diversity of the microbiome that is essential for maintaining skin health.8 From these insights, we can conclude that


by strengthening and balancing the microbial diversity on the skin, skin condition and health can be improved. On the other hand, it seems clear that the use of antibiotics and strong disinfectants and cleaners may lead to a disruption of the microbial associations and impair skin health.


Even though the most common


organisms colonising the skin are identified, the microbiome is dynamic over time and diverse within and between individuals.9 You will not find two individuals with exactly the same microbiome composition, still their skin in both cases may be quite healthy. This diversity is attributed to genetic and demographic properties, age, gender, ethnicity, skin type, lifestyle, hygiene, underlying conditions such as diabetes, immune system, intake of medication, geographic differences, environmental stress by temperature, humidity, seasonal variation, radiation exposure and pollution, cohabitation with animals, profession, BMI and many more. Even short-term contact of the skin with different materials, for example during the preparation of meals or exercising a job, or by touching different surfaces like the handles of doors or support straps in the tram, will result in the transfer of transient and potentially harmful microorganisms. If these microbes manage to settle and infect the skin, depends mainly on the resistance of the resident microorganisms and the integrity of the skin surface. Also, differences in skin condition across


Figure 2: Culture of sampled microorganisms is the basis for most traditional microbiological tests.


the body are the reason of there being completely different microbial associations at different skin sites.10


The face offers home


to microbes that enjoy or at least tolerate high skin surface moisture and higher sebum production. On the other hand, the extremities are rather dry and offer no such optimal conditions for most bacteria. Then, there are also the moist areas in the arm pits and at body folds that offer a completely different environment to microorganisms. The dry versus the moist areas “are likely as ecologically dissimilar as rain forests are to deserts”.11


It has also


become clear that the skin pH-value is of huge impact for the ability of different microbes to survive or even flourish. Bacteria regarded as harmful seem to be especially affected by acidic conditions whereas the healthy microbiome is stable in more acidic environments.12, 13, 14 Trials have been undertaken to analyse


the microbial colonisation in various diseases such as acne and atopic dermatitis. Identifying the predominant species related to this disease, such as


Proving cosmetic claims of microbiome products


Bacterial analysis can be very useful to measure the effect of antibacterial washes, presumably showing a reduction of the bacteria on the skin. Also, the amount of specific bacteria species present is interesting for studying the effect of anti- acne or antibiotic products. It remains in any case difficult to compare the full scope of microbial compositions of different individuals. Therefore, many cleansing


staphylococcus aureus to atopic dermatitis might assist in curing the skin by changing the skin conditions, so that this special species is at a disadvantage. Several ideas have been proposed regarding probiotic and prebiotic treatments and have been controversially discussed.15 Despite the extensive research on skin


microbiome, there is no scientific consensus or even an indication about the composition of the perfectly healthy microbiome. This is mainly due to the described inter-individual variations.


Figure 3: Tewameter measurement with open measurement chamber does not influence the natural evaporation from the skin.


PERSONAL CARE EUROPE


Figure 4: The Corneometer allows quick and easy hydration measurement at different skin sites.


Figure 5: Sebum measurement with the Sebumeter takes approximately 30 seconds.


April 2019


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188