search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
OPINION 15


to the masses. In particular, AI (artificial intelligence) can help make true personalisation scalable, offering a level of service previously only available to the very wealthy. Proven Skincare (launched in November 2018) takes this approach, tailoring specific formulations according to a library of over 20,000 effective ingredients built from aggregated products, consumer reviews and scientific journals. Users are invited to complete a questionnaire that asks them about their lifestyle, environment and skin woes and goals, which is then matched with appropriate ingredients and turned into a three-step skin care regime. These are designed to last just two months, as the founders believe that skin care needs change so regularly the formulas should be tweaked frequently in accordance. Personalisation is not just about consumers getting exactly what they want and appealing to their desire to have a bespoke product. It can also be an exercise in brand building. Through offering customisation as a service, brands open up opportunities to boost interactions with customers by creating new touch points, both on and offline, which gives people a reason to visit stores. And this is where brands can not only offer advice but showcase expertise and build personable engagement with their audience. We are mindful that consumers are not only seeking products and advice targeted to them but a holistic store experience. And as omnichannel shopping becomes established as the norm, customer data is increasingly being used to improve in- store experiences that are catered to the shopper. Appetite for this is clear: in 2018,


April 2019


57% of global online consumers said they like the brands they buy from to recognise them as a customer, for example a shop knowing what they have already purchased online.


Dr Andrea Mitarotonda, MChem PhD FRSC - Consultant in Cosmetic Formulation Chemistry


Andrea, a Chartered


Chemist, has PhD in Polymer & Colloid Chemistry, an MSc in Industrial & Applied


Chemistry and a Diploma in Innovation


Management. After spending nearly 20 years in R&D roles with the likes of Oriflame, Neal’s Yard Remedies, Dow, Lamberti, Intercos and 3M, he has now set up his own consultancy in cosmetic formulation chemistry. In my opinion, the future of the personal care industry is to be summarised in three points: going beyond natural, holistic approach and back to basics. The natural cosmetic movement has been transitioning from ‘niche’ to ‘normal’: merely formulating natural products, even to the extreme length of organic certification, does not solve issues linked to the environment or to more or less sustainable practices. It is only a small piece of the puzzle.


In this context, going ‘beyond natural’ means that more complex formulation criteria need taking into account than simply using vegetable-derived ingredients. For example, the use of water


is a problem for millions of people who barely have enough of it to drink, let alone to shower or to wash their clothes. And what about the use of edible fractions of plants to produce cosmetic ingredients? How sustainable is that practice even when done ‘sustainably’? How ethical when the same edible fractions could be used to feed people? In other words, formulating products “beyond mere natural credentials” should put the circular economy at the forefront: using waste materials in order to produce ingredients (e.g. waste from the wood industry, from coffee grounds, from food by- products or waste), reducing the use of important resources (e.g. water), minimising whatever is not strictly necessary (e.g. why put a bottle of shampoo, a tube of toothpaste or a jar of cream in a box that is most likely wrapped in a non-recyclable plastic film and will anyway end up in the trash can?).


This links very well with going ‘back to basics’ of what a cosmetic product is supposed to be. Have we, somehow, lost sight of what topical products are meant to be and meant to be doing? For example, why do we use a blue colourant in a cream aimed at moisturising the skin? Are we making products that are more complex than they should be in order to perform the functions they had been designed for in the first place?


A futuristic ‘back to basics’ approach is


rooted in good & sound formulation science: the formula itself becomes the active ingredient, the diva on stage! And this is all in line with a more holistic approach to life in general and to cosmetic science in particular. The futuristic cosmetic product is holistic.


PERSONAL CARE EUROPE


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188