search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
SKIN CARE


TABLE 3: SUMMARY OF THE IN VIVO PARAMETERS (0.1% LYSOLECITHIN INGREDIENT) Test parameters


Resolve sensitive skin sign (LAST score) Reduce redness (hemoglobin index) Improve hydration (SC hydration index) Restore skin barrier (TEWL) Shrink pores (pore size)


Smooth out rough skin (roughness index)


++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++


ingredient, compared to the initial. In comparison to the placebo, the erythema index in lysolecithin ingredient-treated skin was also significantly lower (Figure 3B).


Leads to healthy skin Furthermore, reduction in sensitive skin symptoms correlated well with improve major skin parameters such as hydration, water loss, pore size and roughness.


Improves hydration It was found that the moisture content of the SC increased from 32.4 to 35.4 after four weeks of continuous placebo use. In comparison to placebo, a Corneometer® reading of 32.7 increased to 48.6 after four weeks of using the lysolecithin ingredient. This is a massive 1.5 times increase, in


comparison to the initial measurements done on skin. This also made skin moisture significantly higher in comparison to the placebo. In literature, Corneometer reading of less than 30 indicates very dry and less than 40 as dry.8 In the clinical study, the average


Corneometer reading of the volunteers reveals that the skin is on the dry side. From in vitro tests, the lysolecithin ingredient increases moisture-related genes: AQP3, FLG, INV, SPT, OCLN (data not shown) and skin barrier components. In human trials, this combined effect meant 0.1% lysolecithin ingredient significantly increased total skin moisture.


Restores barrier Trans-epidermal water loss has long been a measure of skin barrier integrity. It measures the amount of water that escapes per area of the skin. In the clinical test, the TEWL of the cheek


detected by Tewameter was significantly decreased from 19.5 g/m2


/h to 15.5 g/m2 /h after


four weeks of use of 0.1% lysolecithin ingredient, compared to the initial measurements done on skin. This shows that lysolecithin ingredient can improve the skin barrier and can help the skin retain moisture.


Shrinks visible pores The appearance of visible pores depends on the skin condition. On humans, it was reported that pore sizes increase with age, so older skin has more visible pores compared to younger skin. On younger skin, visible


www.personalcaremagazine.com


pores are correlated mainly with excessive sebum secretion.9


An oily skin, however, is


said to occur in order to compensate for being dehydrated. As for dry skin, it is reported that fluctuations in ∆TEWL, was correlated with pore size.10


The higher the ∆TEWL, the more


visible pores were observed. These three skin conditions with visible pores also have another thing in common, and that is moisture loss. By improving the skin barrier, skin moisture


can be improved, and in effect, the appearance of visible pores can be resolved. Figure 3C shows the representative picture of volunteer #12 after using lysolecithin ingredient for four weeks. Using an instrument called Derma TOP, the


pores were converted into white spots that can be easily seen and analyzed. In the figure, the effect of 0.1% lysolecithin ingredient on skin can be visualized compared to placebo. The treated skin has a smaller pore area after four weeks of continual use. In comparison, the placebo has no visible change in pore area before and after four weeks of use. Measuring the pore area on the cheek that used lysolecithin ingredient showed that the pore area was significantly decreased, from 4.8 mm2


to 2.9 mm2 after four weeks of


use, in comparison to the initial values. In comparison to the placebo, the lysolecithin ingredient tended to decrease the pore area more than the placebo after four weeks of continual use.


Smooths out rough skin Another skin parameter that has correlations with skin moisture and TEWL is skin texture.11 The R2 value of Visioscan® gives a quantifiable value to the physiological condition of the living skin surface. R2 refers to the maximum roughness, and


lowering the R2 value lowers the skin texture. In the study, the cheek skin texture R2 was significantly decreased from 82.5 to 75.5 at week four.


Conclusion MFL is an abbreviation of ‘multi-functionalized lecithin’. By industrialization of whole-cell enzyme technology, Nikkol Lecinol MFL was developed as a product with high naturality and sustainability. This ingredient can do multiple tasks to improve the skin barrier. It targets multiple skin-barrier related genes


63


vs. initial value


vs. placebo in data of ∆4w-0w


++ ++ ++


ns


+ +


++: significantly improve; +: has tendency to improve; ns: no significant difference


and promotes protein and lipid production of skin barrier related components. It can provide multiple skin benefits: improves hydration, restores barrier function, smooths out rough skin, shrinks visible pores, reduces redness and ultimately resolves sensitive skin signs. The lysolecithin ingredient, therefore,


exhibits total support for skin barrier formation, and is a highly useful functional ingredient.


PC


References 1. Farage MA. The Prevalence of Sensitive Skin. Front. Med. (Lausanne). 2019; 6:98


2. Lin B, Tao Y. Whole-cell biocatalysts by design. Microbial Cell Factories. 2017;16(1)


3. Lefèvre-Utile A, Braun C, Haftek M, Aubin F. Five Functional Aspects of the Epidermal Barrier. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(21):11676


4. Misery L, Ständer S, Szepietowski JC, et al. Definition of Sensitive Skin: An Expert Position Paper from the Special Interest Group on Sensitive Skin of the International Forum for the Study of Itch. Acta. Derm. Venereol. 2017;97(1):4-6


5. Muizzuddin N, Marenus KD, Maes DH. Factors defining sensitive skin and its treatment. American Journal of Contact Dermatitis. 1998; 9(3):170-175.


6. Lyu J, Diao Q, Wang S, Yu Y, Jiang Y. Study on screening and evaluation methods of cosmetics for people with facial sensitive skin. Medicine. 2022;101(31)


7. Zhang Y, Jin Y, Humbert P et al. An herbal cream reduces erythema of sensitive skin. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 2021; 20: 792–797


8. Kim SH, Kim JH, Lee SJ, Jung MS, Jeong DH, Lee KH. Minimally invasive skin sampling and transcriptome analysis using microneedles for skin type biomarker research. Skin Res. Technol. 2022; 28: 322–335


9. Roh M, Han M, Kim D, Chung K. Sebum output as a factor contributing to the size of facial pores. Br. J. Dermatol. 2006 Nov; 155(5):890-4


10. Miyamoto K, Munakata Y, Yan X, Tsuji G, Furue M. Enhanced Fluctuations in Facial Pore Size, Redness, and TEWL Caused by Mask Usage Are Normalized by the Application of a Moisturizer. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 2121.


11. Egawa M et al. Effect of exposure of human skin to a dry environment. Skin Research and Technology. 2002; 8(4), pp. 212–218


April 2024 PERSONAL CARE


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154