search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
SUN CARE


skin is exposed, coupled with the fact that they damage not only DNA but also its repair enzymes, the combined effects of pollution and other radiation wavelengths may now be quantitatively more important causes of skin cancer than UVB irradiation.


The role of antioxidants Although skin possesses numerous natural antioxidants to combat ROS, excessive or chronic exposure of tissues to oxidizing agents of any kind can overwhelm them. The most important natural antioxidants in skin are enzymes, such as glutathione peroxidase, superoxide dismutase, and catalase. Of secondary, but nevertheless significant,


importance are small endogenous and exogenous molecules, such as ubiquinol, uric acid, vitamin E, vitamin C, and carotenoids. There have been no controlled clinical trials of topical antioxidants for the prevention of skin cancer. Studies of the effects topical ascorbate,


alpha-tocopherol, retinyl palmitate, retinoic acid, and polyphenols on UV-induced ROS production, DNA lesions, and skin tumours in animals, and of topical ascorbate, vitamin E, and beta-carotene on UV-induced erythema in humans have recently been reviewed.64 Although the results were often encouraging,


depletion of the antioxidant was consistently observed during UV irradiation. Accordingly, the jury is out on whether more powerful synthetic antioxidants, such as the salen-manganese molecule EUK-13465, could significantly improve skin cancer prevention. More clinical data would be valuable.


A novel approach to counter lipid peroxidation ROS damage DNA and enzymes by both direct and indirect effects, the latter mediated by reactive aldehydes, such as the MDA and 4-HNE that are produced by their interactions with unsaturated fatty acids and other lipids in cell membranes and the interstitial fluid.66-68


A


novel approach to counter the effects of lipid peroxidation has been developed by Kutanios. Based on the knowledge that some of the


protein components of plasma lipoproteins have high binding affinities for lipid peroxides, the company has developed small peptides with similar physical properties for skincare. In cell culture, their lead peptide has been shown to almost completely protect the DNA of UV-irradiated keratinocytes from oxidative damage, and cell proteins from the formation of covalent adducts with 4-HNE.69


The approach


has several attractions. Peptides have a long history of safety in


skincare; if composed of L-amino acids, they are completely biodegradable; they pose no threats to the environment; they can be manufactured by green technologies; and the mechanism of action will apply to lipid peroxides produced by all ROS, what ever their origin. A further attraction is that lipid peroxides


have several other effects that promote the ageing of skin, increasing the secretion of matrix metalloproteinases and inflammatory cytokines, aggregating elastin, damaging collagen, and harming the lipid composition of the stratum


www.personalcaremagazine.com


43


IR AND VISIBLE


POLLUTION UVA ROS


Ozone NO2 PAHC Particles


LIPID PEROXIDES


MDA, 4HNE


DNA DAMAGE


UVB


Figure 3: Pathways by which solar radiation and atmospheric pollutants damage DNA. IR, infrared; VL, visible light; ROS, reactive oxygen species; MDA, malondialdehyde; 4HNE, 4-hydroxynonenal. ROS and lipid peroxides also damage DNA repair enzymes


corneum, important for maintaining the hydration of the skin.69 Being biodegradable, peptides of L-amino acids pose no threat to the environment, and can be manufactured by green technologies. A further attraction is sequestration of lipid peroxides is likely to be synergistic for DNA and enzyme protection with the protections afforded by radiation filters and antioxidants, and with the actions of matrikines for the general anti-ageing of skin.


Conclusion A striking feature of the field of skin cancer prevention is the contrast between the wealth of data from laboratory and experimental science and the paucity of data from clinical studies. Overall, the results suggest that UV screens


can be of benefit, especially if used from an early age, when applied correctly and regularly, and when users do not in consequence increase their exposure to sunlight in the mistaken belief that they are fully protected. Improvements in public education, to which the industry


can contribute, should help to counter these problems. Yet the likely reality is that no amount of


education will completely correct them, and that new technologies are needed. These could fall into three broad categories: filters that are less prone to photo-decompose, are without off-target activities, and absorb radiation over the entire UVA, UVB, and infra-red spectrum; antioxidants of greater potency and stability; and molecules that prevent or reverse the effects of ROS and their products, such as lipid peroxides, on DNA and enzymes. The last two categories have the additional


attraction of providing protection not only from sunlight, but also from the growing problem of atmospheric pollution. All new molecules should, of course, be biodegradable and without harmful effects on the environment. These are challenging objectives to which both industry and academia can contribute in tandem.


References to this article are available at: https://bit.ly/3SXE9tp


April 2024 PERSONAL CARE


PC


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154