search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
MANUFACTURE


Successful scale-up: foolproof your formula


Sarah Lucas Marsden - Orean


As a contract manufacturer, Orean works with customers ranging from indie start-ups to well-established global brands. Our in-house development team bring brand concepts to life, driving innovative product development in our labs and producing bespoke premium skin and hair care products. At the forefront of every new product we


develop is the consideration of how that product can be scaled up. This includes how we can achieve plant efficiencies and safeguard formulations to ensure the scale-up process is as smooth as possible. This article will outline some common


challenges experienced during scale-up and how formulations can be adapted to become more resilient to the process. It will also highlight the effect of different packaging options during filling and dispatch, to allow cost-effective choices to be made during the NPD process.


Think big from day one Generally, any aspect considered simple in the lab could be far more difficult on a large scale. For example, visually assessing a water phase in a glass beaker to ensure powders have fully dissolved is significantly more difficult in a five- tonne stainless steel mixing vessel. To overcome this, top and bottom samples


are taken from the mixer, or a sample thief is used to extract samples from different depths within the mixer to ensure the liquid is uniform throughout. The following sections showcase some of


the common problems batches may experience when produced on a large scale and how formulas can be safeguarded to mitigate the risks.


45


Haziness: a sign of instability Some clear, water-based batches may appear slightly hazy when made on a large scale if oily materials are not sufficiently solubilised. Even if the product’s packaging is not transparent, it is important to correct the haziness. This is ultimately a sign of instability and could potentially lead to elements of the formula sedimenting out. This is a concern for products with spray pumps: the sedimentation could clog the dip


tube and prevent the liquid from being drawn up and dispensed. Haziness can often be corrected by gently heating the batch, ensuring it does not compromise the preservatives or impair the fragrance. This is not usually a significant concern providing batches are not exposed to prolonged lengths of heating. Alternatively, additional solubiliser may be


required to solubilise the oily components of the formula which are causing the slight haziness. In these cases, care should be taken that additional solubiliser does not cause the product to feel sticky or tacky, as can sometimes be the case. Certain solubilisers have been known to


work synergistically, such as polysorbate 20 and PEG-40 hydrogenated castor oil. Using these two solubilisers in an equal ratio is often more effective than using either one alone. This also allows a smaller amount of


polysorbate 20 to be used, reducing the risk of creating a sticky texture. If products are formulated with synergistic solubilisers, the risk of haziness on scale-up can be reduced.


Figure 1: Different packaging options can impact the success of filling products on high-speed production lines


www.personalcaremagazine.com


Combatting natural variation in colour Batches which are coloured using natural colourants such as carrot oil or seabuckthorn


April 2024 PERSONAL CARE


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154