search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
NATURALS


raw materials used alongside and often blended with synthetic emulsifiers are in fact natural and 100% plant derived. Examples of these are cetyl alcohol, cetearyl alcohol, stearic acid and glyceryl stearate. With some careful formulating these popular natural materials can be used alongside natural emulsifiers to obtain a great texture.


Water thickeners One of the most common ingredient categories in cosmetics that is targeted for replacement with natural ingredients is rheology modifiers and thickeners. Carbomer, a polymer of acrylic acid, is a useful and highly functional raw material specifically developed for the cosmetic industry to improve the feel, stability, and viscosity of a wide variety of cosmetic formulations, for example, face creams, lotions, facial and body gels, hair gel, hand sanitiser and many more. The INCI name for carbomer is usually listed


as ‘Carbomer’ but close derivatives include Acrylates/C10-30 Alkyl Acrylate Crosspolymer and Acrylates Copolymer. Most of them produce highly viscous,


transparent gels in water at a low use level. The texture and skin feel of carbomer make it a difficult product to replace effectively with natural alternatives. The key to replacing carbomer effectively is defining what function it has in the selected formulation. If transparency is the key property, and the high viscosity and suspension characteristics are not that important, then products such as cellulose gum, transparent xanthan gum and sclerotium gum could be considered. If a high viscosity is required but transparency


is not important, for example in a cream formulation, then gums such as guar, tara and gellan could be considered. Table 2 shows some natural thickener systems based on the functional properties required.


Surfactants


The all-purpose surfactant Sodium Laureth Sulphate (SLES) has both natural and synthetic molecular parts and is often targeted for removal by formulators due to ethoxylation of the Lauryl group. There are other reasons for this, not just the synthetic aspect, but also because it is a known eye and skin irritant and may not be suitable for some applications.


Primary or Secondary


TABLE 1: NATURAL EMULSIFIER SYSTEMS Natural Emulsifier type


Polyglycerol Esters (High HLB)


Polyglycerol Esters (Low HLB)


Sucrose Esters


Natural Anionic Emulsifiers


57


Examples


Polyglyceryl-10 Stearate, Polyglyceryl-6 Oleate


Polyglyceryl-2 Triisostearate, Polyglyceryl-3 Polyricinoleate


Sucrose Laurate, Sucrose Stearate


Sodium Stearoyl Lactylate, Sodium Stearoyl Glutamate, Glyceryl Stearyl Citrate, Potassium Cetyl Phosphate


TABLE 2: NATURAL THICKENERS Key Property Required


Transparency High viscosity Stabilisation Suggested Natural Ingredients


Cellulose Gum, Xanthan Gum (certain grades), Sclerotium Gum, Locust Bean Gum (Carob), Carrageenan


Tara Gum, Guar Gum, Gellan Gum, Konjac, Carrageenan


Microcrystalline or microfibrillated Cellulose, Xanthan Gum, Sclerotium Gum, Gellan Gum


SLES is a very effective and cheap ingredient


and is not easy to replace due to its superior foam production and the fact it is salt thickened, meaning that any alternative system probably has to be thickened using another technique such as a natural gum, giving a less favourable - and more expensive - rheology. The secondary amphoteric surfactant


Cocamidopropylbetaine is less often targeted for removal, however it does contain synthetic entities so in very natural products is sometimes replaced with coco-betaine, which is 100% naturally derived. Common natural replacements are shown in


Table 3. It is worth mentioning that performance is usually compromised by substituting the synthetics and effective foaming and cleansing is difficult to achieve using only natural ingredients.


Emollients Emollients is an easy category of ingredients to replace with natural alternatives and often natural oils and esters are the first choice for


TABLE 3: SURFACTANT SYSTEMS TO REPLACE SYNTHETICS Key Property Required


Glucosides (Decyl, Lauryl, Coco)


Saponins (e.g. Yucca, Quillaja, Soapnut, Soapwort)


Sucrose Esters (Laurate, Myristate)


Biosurfactants (Sophorolipids, Glycolipids, Rhamnolipids)


Amino Acid based surfactants (e.g. Sodium Cocoyl Glycinate)


Primary Secondary/Foam Booster Secondary Primary or Secondary Primary or Secondary Classification Non Ionic Non Ionic Non ionic Non ionic Anionic Notes On Use


Popular natural mild surfactants based on glucose. Not salt thickened.


Not highly cleansing or foaming on their own but can be an effective additive.


Effective but expensive.


Fermentation technology, foaming performance poor but acceptable cleansing.


Very effective but relatively expensive.


www.personalcaremagazine.com


Synthetic Emulsifier Replaced


Ethoxylated esters e.g. PEG-100 Stearate, PEG-40 Hydrogenated Castor Oil, Polysorbate 20


Laureth-3, Steareth-2 High HLB Ethoxylates


High HLB Ethoxylates


Notes On Use


Need to select those grades that are transparent. High levels of use may not be completely transparent.


Viscosity usually increases with use level, however high levels are associated with unfavourable sensory effects such as pilling.


Thixotropy (rheology associated with shear thinning) is often a sign that a thickener is good for stabilising emulsions.


many formulators due to their sensory properties. Most vegetable oils will be classified as natural and COSMOS approved. However, it is worth checking with the


supplier how the oil was extracted, as some are hexane-extracted from the seed or nut - making them unsuitable for COSMOS approval. For true natural classification, oils should be cold pressed or CO2 extracted. There are a huge number of vegetable derived


esters available and these can be considered COSMOS natural due to esterification being a permitted chemical process reaction. Many different sensory characteristics can be obtained with esters, from very light and volatile to heavy and substantive depending on the chain length, degree of saturation and branching of the fatty acids that make up the ester. The synthetic emollient group mainly consists


of paraffin oil and derivatives such as petrolatum, synthetic emollient esters and silicones. Silicones are worth a special mention as they are quite difficult to replace, particularly in haircare applications. It is hard to reproduce the slippery feel, smoothing effect and spreadability of silicones, as is the high heat stability in applications such as heat protection spray or serum. Hair conditioners that are silicone free sometimes lack the smoothing effectiveness of those containing silicones, although ‘silicone free’ is a popular claim for those consumers who believe build-up on hair to be a problem. Table 4 shows a selection of popular natural emollients and their properties.


Colours Essential in cosmetics to add interest to a toiletry product, or as a decorative colour cosmetic, the use of colours in cosmetics has always been a challenge. In natural cosmetics, it is difficult to achieve the vibrancy and longevity of a synthetic colour and some compromises need to be made.


April 2024 PERSONAL CARE


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154