search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
SKIN PROTECTION 127


Returning to our origins through skin rewilding


 Júlia Comas, Olga Laporta, Marie Ollagnier, Núria Almiñana, Raquel Delgado – Lipotec, Spain


The modernisation process that came along with the Industrial Revolution promoted a reduction in human interaction with nature. This important moment also represented a trigger in the prevalence of inflammatory skin disorders such as allergies and eczemas, suggesting a link between a reduced exposure to nature and an increase in skin sensitivity. In order to travel back in time and understand the skin characteristics of our ancestors before modernisation, a study was performed on an isolated hunter-gatherer village in the Amazon jungle, whose members did not have any previous contact with urban or modern lifestyles. The research compared their skin microbial genome to that of individuals living in the United States with a lower connection with nature and higher antimicrobial practices. Results suggested that the exposure to modern lifestyles may induce alterations in the cutaneous microbiota, such as a reduction in bacterial diversity, that could make the skin more prone to sensitivity and discomfort.1


One of the most important vital functions of the skin microbiota is its contribution to the role of the skin as a protective barrier and this can occur through different mechanisms. Through the direct competition for space and nutrients, the beneficial bacteria can cause the exclusion of potentially harmful bacteria.2 Also, the reciprocal interaction of the microbiota with keratinocytes helps enhance the innate immune response, allowing the recognition of pathogens to prevent their


0 days Abstract


Discomfort, fragility, dehydration, scaliness and redness are all characteristics of sensitive skin that is lacking an effective defense system. Individuals living in urban environments are more prone to suffer from skin sensitivity, suggesting a relationship between low exposure to nature and inflammatory disorders. The link between nature and skin health involves the skin microbiota, which has been found to be different in uncontacted populations with healthier and more protected skin. Fensebiome™ peptide helped promote a healthy microbiome similar to that of our ancestors in closer contact with nature and to reinforce the physical barrier function by improving the cell cohesion and the skin barrier protective effect on urban subjects, helping restore sensitive skin.


invasion, while promoting a maintenance of the essential skin immune tolerance.3, 4 The epidermal barrier integrity is also key


in offering skin protection. In particular, the intercellular junctions found in the stratum granulosum and the lipid barrier in the stratum corneum help protect the skin form harmful elements of the environment and provide an efficient permeability barrier against excessive loss of water and electrolytes. An impaired defensive function is observed in sensitive skin, characterised by an abnormal microbial colonisation, an impaired barrier function and an aberrant lipid organisation.5 Considering the protective role of the


microbiota, the concept of cutaneous barrier function evolved from being formed not only by the most traditional physical barrier made up of lipids and corneocytes, but also by a living ecosystem considered as the second protective shield of the skin. The recently developed Fensebiome™ peptide (INCI name: Water (Aqua), Caprylyl


7 days 0 days


Glycol, Acetyl Heptapeptide-4) is a heptaptide intended to strengthen urban exposed skin by reinforcing the double cutaneous barrier function and preventing dehydration. The efficacy of the active ingredient was evaluated through several in vitro and in vivo tests.


Favourable skin microbiome A metagenomics analysis was performed on 21 female urban volunteers (18-59 years old), who applied a cream containing 1% of a solution with Acetyl Heptapeptide-4 on the cubital fossa of one arm and a placebo cream on the other, twice a day. Several microbiome parameters were assessed after 7 days of treatment.


Diversity


The diversity of skin bacteria, which is higher in the skin of people in close contact with nature, was determined by the Shannon index, used as an indicator of skin health.


7 days


Placebo April 2018


1% of a solution with Acetyl Heptapeptide-4 Figure 1: Fluorescence microscopy images obtained from different strips before and after each treatment. PERSONAL CARE EUROPE


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184