This content requires Adobe Flash Player version
or later.
Either you do not have Adobe Flash Player installed,
or your version is too old,
or there is a problem with your Flash installation and we were unable to detect it.
Issue on which EAOW THREE and FOUR seek agreement on
Data collected by EAOW for characterisation of the onshore ecology are suitable for EA3 and EA4 EIA (see ETG background paper Appendix 1)
2 3 4
5 6
7
Confirmation required that surveys conducted in 2012 to be used in EA 4 assessments at still valid for submission of DCO in 2015
Proposed methodology for assessment is agreed (ETG background paper section 4.2 )
Proposed terminology for assessment is agreed (ETG background paper section 4.2 )
List of potential impacts to be considered in the EIA to be agreed
Impact assessment will consider embedded mitigation as the starting point and EA1 mitigation is the basis EA3 and EA4
Conclusions with regard to HRA and EPS (for non-ornithological features) to be agreed
NE Position
SCC Position
Agreed – but where possible this data should be supplemented by any pre- construction surveys being undertaken for EA ONE
Agreed – but as per EA ONE, the DCO will need to secure further pre-construction surveys Agreed
Agreed Agreed
Agreed – this should refer to EA ONE mitigation as informed by the EA ONE pre- construction surveys
Suggest that ETG background paper section 4.5 should separate out HRA issues from EPS issues as they are not directly related. Agree that there are not likely to be any non-ornithological onshore LSE in the HRA context Agree that there is not likely to be any adverse effects on EPS, provided that pre- construction surveys are secured and are able to inform appropriate mitigation (as secured through the Landscape & Ecological Management Plan for EA ONE).