This content requires Adobe Flash Player version
or later.
Either you do not have Adobe Flash Player installed,
or your version is too old,
or there is a problem with your Flash installation and we were unable to detect it.
SI1 - Location SI2 - Pond area SI3 - Pond drying SI4 - Water quality SI4 - Shade SI6 - Fowl SI7 - Fish
SI8 - Ponds
SI9 - Terr'l habitat SI10 - Macrophytes HSI
Rating
67 1 1
0.9
0.67 1
0.01 0.01 0.95 1
0.35 0.34 Poor
68 1
0.2 1 1 1 1
0.01 0.35 0.33 0.5
0.40 Poor
69 1 1
0.9
0.33 1
0.01 0.33 0.55 0.67 0.3
0.40 Poor
71 1
0.2 0.5
0.33 0.6 1 1
0.95 1
0.3 0.60 Average
72 1
0.8 0.5 1 1
0.67 1
0.7 1
0.5 0.79 Good
Pond ref
SI1 - Location SI2 - Pond area SI3 - Pond drying SI4 - Water quality SI4 - Shade SI6 - Fowl SI7 - Fish
SI8 - Ponds
SI9 - Terr'l habitat SI10 - Macrophytes HSI
Rating
78 1
0.1 0.5
0.33 0.6 1 1
0.7 1
0.9 0.60 Average
79 1
0.6 1
0.33 1
0.67 1
0.7 1
0.3 0.70 Good
81 1
0.6 1
0.33 1
0.67 1
0.7 1
0.3 0.70 Good
82 1
0.4 1
0.67 1
0.67 1
0.95 1
0.35 0.75
Good
85 1
0.4 1
0.33 1
0.67 1
0.65 1
0.3 0.67 Average
8.2
Justification for water bodies not surveyed
A total of 5 water bodies were classified as not being suitable for Great Crested Newts following the HSI survey visit. This conclusion was reached based on a combination of factors. These included:
• a low HSI score; East Anglia Offshore Wind Limited
Great Crested Newt Survey Technical Report 854188 (Rev 02)