search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
130 SUSTAINABILITY


Biodegradation testing There are clear test methodologies used to determine biodegradation and the rating system is also clearly defined. The OECD in their guidelines (1981b, 1991, 1992a, 1992b, 2001, 2002, 2004a, 2008) distinguishes six forms of biodegradation (Table 2).8 Looking at Table 2, there are three important


factors that are needed to successfully navigate biodegradation test analyses. Diversity of tests - a number of tests that can


be utilized and selection is the key. Specifying the test used to be evaluated. Specifying the percentage of the actives


being tested. There is also some misunderstanding about the nature of the tests that best define biodegradation. A potential problem with biodegradability values is deciding if biodegradation should be run on a single raw material or on the finished formulation. Since solubilization of biodegradable oils


present in a formulation can dilute materials being tested, they can also solubilize oils. Put simply, the finished formulation appears to be the most important when choosing what to evaluate since it is in fact what gets into the environment.


2. Renewable Renewable is defined by the OECE as something capable of being maintained at a steady level without exhausting natural resources or causing severe ecological damage.


TABLE 2: OECD DEFINITIONS OF BIOGRADATION


1. Ultimate biodegradation (mineralization): The level of degradation achieved when the test compound is totally utilized by micro-organisms in the production of carbon dioxide, water, mineral salts and new microbial cellular constituents (biomass).


2. Primary biodegradation (biotransformation): The alteration in the chemical structure of a substance, brought about by biological action, resulting in the loss of a specific property of that substance.


3. Readily biodegradable: An arbitrary classification of chemicals which have passed certain specified screening tests for ultimate biodegradability; these tests are so stringent that it is assumed that such compounds will rapidly and completely biodegrade in aquatic environments under aerobic conditions.


4. Inherent biodegradable: A classification of chemicals for which there is unequivocal evidence of biodegradation (primary or ultimate) in any test of biodegradability.


5. Half-life (t0.5): The time taken for 50% transformation of a test substance when the transformation can be described by first-order kinetics; it is independent of the initial concentration.


6. Disappearance time 50 (DT50): The time within which the initial concentration of the test substance is reduced by 50%.


Of particular relevance to the personal care industry is the OECD’s statement that “sustainable chemistry is a scientific concept that seeks to improve the efficiency with which natural resources are used to meet human needs for chemical products and services.


Sustainable chemistry encompasses the design, manufacture and use of efficient, effective, safe and more environmentally benign chemical products and processes.”9 The OECD adds: “Sustainable chemistry is also a process that stimulates innovation


PERSONAL CARE April 2023


www.personalcaremagazine.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143