search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
80 HAIR CARE


Hair anti-frizz effect through sound Hair surface condition is one of the attributes immediately identified by a consumer after the application of a hair care product. Friction reduction is directly linked, microscopically, to the increase of softness of the hair fibre surface, which includes reduced roughness and closing of the outer cuticular layers of the fibre. Macroscopically, a lower degree of


aggregation and interaction between the fibres is observed. This is what characterises healthy conditioned hair, a reduction in friction during styling, and, consequently, the frizz sensation. In general, conditioning ingredients have


cationic molecules that induce a positive electrical charge in the hair fibre, levelling and restructuring the cuticular scales, which improves hair colour and shine. The resulting soft feel makes the strands easier to comb and detangle, in both wet and dry conditions. The negative charge of the hair attracts


the positively charged molecules of the conditioning ingredient, helping it to settle on the hair. This is especially true for damaged hair since the damaging processes result in hair fibres being further negatively charged. These conditioning components help to


reduce or prevent static charges on the hair since most of the electrons given off by the passage of the hair comb are attracted by the cationic sites of the cosmetic product. These electrons quickly return to hair fibres, keeping the hair with a neutral net charge without the undesired effect of frizz. We carried out a study to evaluate the


efficacy of Jatropha macrantha extract in reducing hair friction, through the translation of the surface roughness into musical sounds. We used sophisticated equipment with an electronic sensor able to traduce the roughness of hair fibres resulting from the friction of these fibres against the sensor, into a melody. Then, the musical files were converted into frequency (Hz) versus intensity (dB) data. A better anti-frizz capacity is indicated by an intensity sound attenuation. In this testing protocol, six strands of


double bleached Caucasian hair underwent a standardised preliminary cleaning process and were divided into two groups. A control group of three strands were treated with a placebo (shampoo plus ampoules), soaked for 20 seconds and rinsed off. Then, the placebo ampoule was applied, massaged in for 60 seconds and rinsed off after three minutes. In the treatment group, three strands were


treated with 2% Jatropha macrantha extract shampoo plus 10% ampoules, soaked for 20 seconds and rinsed off. After, 2% Jatropha macrantha extract shampoo was applied and massaged in for 60 seconds. Then, a 10% Jatropha macrantha extract ampoule was applied and massaged for 60 seconds. Again, the strands were rinsed off and excess water removed (five shampoo applications plus three ampoule applications). For frizz evaluation, a device with


electronic sensors (WIDI 4.50 Pro software, Figure 5) was used. This device is capable of translating the roughness of the hair fibres (friction produced on the sensor) into a melody. The measurement was carried out


PERSONAL CARE April 2022 A 0


-10 -20 -30 -40 -50 -60 -70 -80 -90


-100 B


-20.00 -30.00 -40.00 -50.00 -60.00 -70.00 -80.00 -90.00


-100.00 -110.00 -120.00


0 5,000 10,000 Frequency (Hz) Figure 6: Results of frequency vs. intensity in the control & treatment groups (a) & average results (b)


in triplicate for each strand. The sound was obtained in the audible range between 20 Hz and 20 KHz. The music file obtained from the friction


of the strands was converted into a text file using Audacity software. Thus, it was possible to obtain the intensity data as a function of the frequency, so as to be able to compare the treatments. The mean intensity for each treatment was calculated (Figure 6). A positive dB value means an increase in


the signal, whereas a negative value indicates an attenuation and a value of 0 means that there is no change in the signal. Lower intensity values indicate that the strand presented a lower friction coefficient which implies a greater efficiency of the treatment in reducing the frizz of the hair fibre on the sensor. The hair strands treated with Jatropha macrantha extract presented a significantly lower (-13.02%) sound intensity value than the placebo group strands.


Summary When hair is exposed to environmental pollutants, chemical treatments and physical stress, in what is known as hair weathering, it becomes, sooner or later, damaged. This damage can affect only the hair fibre surface attributes like smoothness, frizz, porosity and shine, or it can also affect its inner architecture and mechanical properties. Jatropha macrantha extract exerts a hair


global protective action. Through various in vitro and in vivo studies, it has demonstrated its ability to not only protect the hair against daily aggressions but also to reinforce and rebuild the hair fibre, avoiding the degradation and loss of proteins. Thanks to its antioxidant potential, Jatropha macrantha extract preserves the CMC, supporting hair resistance and elasticity and improving weak and breakable hair being the perfect ally to prevent and reverse hair ageing.


15,000 20,000 Control ■ Treatment Group ■ Control Treatment Group


-74.56 -87.58


PC www.personalcaremagazine.com


Intensity (dB)


Intensity (dB)


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116