search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
38 NATURALS


active for 24 hours. The TNF-α and IL-8 levels (pro-inflammatory cytokines) were quantified from the cell structure supernatant by ELISA. The positive control of anti-inflammatory action was dexamethasone. The results show that turmeric lysate


completely restored TNF-α and IL-8 levels from the inflamed cells. The effect was very potent at all tested doses, reaching up to 97% and 78% respectively. This was higher than dexamethasone and similar to the mindfulness effect5


. In a second test, an in vitro assay, it was


demonstrated that turmeric lysate was able to capture up to an 82% of the free radical DPPH, showing a significant antioxidant capacity compared to the control. According to the literature, stressed skin heals slower than regular skin6


. To see the effect


of the active, a scratch test was performed and the healing process was monitored by phase- contrast microscopy. Turmeric lysate regenerated human dermal


fibroblasts (HDFs) by up to 72% at 24 hours and up to 63% at 48 hours compared to baseline conditions (Figure 1). The enhancing effect at 24 hours was higher than 10% that of the positive control, foetal bovine serum, thus showing a growth factor-like effect. Stressed skin releases excess of cortisol,


which causes skin damage. To test the protection of the active against cortisol, human organotypic skin explant cultures were used. The skin was stressed by exposure of healthy explants to hydrocortisone (10µg/ml) daily and was compared to non-stressed skin. The stressed skin was also treated, in


parallel, with 0.5% or 1% turmeric lysate daily. Images were taken by optical microscopy from histological sections stained with Masson’s trichrome, and the levels of collagen and elastin were quantified by colorimetry after 12 days. The active ingredient was demonstrated


ex vivo to protect the collagen and elastin degradation levels up to 89% and up to


3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00


Untreatment skin (non-stressed control)


protection degradation 53% 89% hydrocortisone)


Stressed skin (+10ug/ml


Stressed skin +0.5%


Stressed skin +1%


Turmeria ZEN


3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00


Untreatment skin (non-stressed control)


protection degradation 34% 96% Non stressed skin (10ug/ml hydrocortisone daily) Stressed skin +


Stressed skin + 1% Turmeria ZEN


hydrocortisone)


Stressed skin (+10ug/ml


Stressed skin +0.5%


Stressed skin +1%


Turmeria ZEN


Figure 2: Protection of cortisol-stressed explants after applying turmeric lysate * Note: * Mainly collagen Type I


96% compared to stressed skin explants, respectively, showing a more structured and densified skin. This shows that it prevents the adverse effects of excessive hydrocortisone on the skin, thus protecting the dermal fibres (collagen and elastin) from stress-induced degradation (Figure 2). In an ex vivo test of regenerative activity, we


looked at how turmeric lysate demonstrated regenerative properties on punch biopsies (epidermis removal of 8 mm diameter, leaving the inner 3 mm circle with epidermis). After the application of turmeric lysate on Days 0, 3 and 5, the biopsies were analysed on Day 8. Figure 3 shows that turmeric lysate has a higher epidermal regeneration than epidermal growth factor (EGF), as well as higher dermal redensifying and restructuring effects.


Clinical evaluation For the in vivo test, a panel of 20 volunteers was selected, who were aged 30–50 and subject to intense psychosocial stress, and who did not have a high or very high initial skin hydration. Volunteer selection was done through a State- Trait Anxiety Inventory for Adults questionnaire and a cortisol test in saliva by Salimetrics Europe. This was a single-blind, placebo-controlled


study, with two applications per day in the face of turmeric lysate and a placebo and at 1%, for 28 days. It was carried out during the winter season (January-February) in Poland, which is extra challenging for the skin because of the dryness arising from the intense cold. The measurements were taken on the crow’s feet area. Turmeric lysate significantly increased the


average cutaneous hydration rate by 13% on average from the start of the study after 28 days of treatment (p < 0.001), 4.3 times more than the placebo, proving its effect as an emotional wellbeing manager. This is a very significant value considering that the study was performed on skin that was not selected for its level of dryness but for its level of psychosocial stress. Stress wrinkles are usually deeper than other


kinds of wrinkles and are related to the brain- skin connection. Turmeric lysate significantly reduced the depth of the deepest wrinkles at 28 days (p < 0.05), by 9% on average from the start of the study and up to 40 % as the maximum obtained effect (Figure 4). This shows that the active acts on deep


wrinkles demonstrating a profound smoothing effect. It reduced the depth of deep (110 µm+). wrinkles by an average of 16 µm, with a maximum reduction of 71 µm.


EGF 5 µg/ml East Anglia Turmeria ZEN 50 µg/ml


Figure 3: Regenerative properties of turmeric lysate at 8 days vs. EGF effect Note: Pictures of three different biopsies are shown for both EGF and turmeric lysate). Data from the Norwich Skin Platform, University of


Conclusion Derived from turmeric stem cells, the active ingredient Turmeria ZenTM


acts against


stress wrinkles, especially deep wrinkles, and significantly increases the wellbeing and hydration of stressed skin by protecting and regenerating it, acting as an emotional


PERSONAL CARE April 2022 www.personalcaremagazine.com


Collagen* levels (µg/mg skin)


Elastin levels (µg/mg skin)


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116