search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
144 NATURAL INGREDIENTS


Moving on from petrochemistry towards bio-inspiration


Pascale Goyat – Natura-Tec


In the world of cosmetics, petrolatum, derived from petroleum distillation, has long held a prominent place due to its film-forming, emollient, and moisturising properties. However, its fossil origin, near-zero biodegradability, and inert but non-biologically active composition raise questions at a time when the industry is moving toward more sustainable and responsible formulations. Faced with this transition, plant-based


alternatives are multiplying, meeting growing expectations for transparency, eco-responsibility, and performance. At Natura-Tec, we have developed an exclusive range of 100% natural protective gels, designed to offer equivalent—or even superior— effectiveness while adhering to a minimalist, ethical, and sustainable formulation approach.


Synthetic versus natural petrolatum: advantages and limitations The use of mineral-based gels offers undeniable technical benefits: chemical inertness, high stability, skin tolerance, excellent occlusive power, and low production costs. These are all arguments that explain their historical popularity, particularly in dermatology and pharmacy. However, these benefits come with


significant limitations, both environmentally and dermatologically. The extraction of fossil resources, their transformation, and their subsequent persistence in natural environments due to their non-biodegradability pose major environmental problems. On the skin, their occlusive effect, while useful


in certain contexts, can become problematic: some reactive or blemish-prone skin types may poorly tolerate these materials, perceived as suffocating or even comedogenic in some cases. Faced with these limitations, the cosmetics


industry is turning to plant-based alternatives, which meet sustainability requirements while offering functional added value. Derived from renewable, biodegradable natural resources, these raw materials are fully in line with a circular approach. More than just a replacement, they introduce


a new approach: certain plant-based fats are not only neutral, but also play an active role in the formulation. Depending on their composition, they can exhibit anti-aging, moisturizing, or protective properties, making their integration all the more relevant. Sensoriality is also a driver of innovation.


PERSONAL CARE MAGAZINE April 2026


Whereas mineral oils had a relatively uniform texture, plant-based derivatives allow for fine modulation of feel: dry, melting, non-sticky... all characteristics favoured by today’s consumers, seeking comfort and naturalness. Moreover, their chemical composition, often similar to sebum or lipids naturally present in the skin, promotes better skin affinity, thus enhancing the overall effectiveness of skin care products. However, this transition is not without its


challenges. Plant-based fats require rigorous formulation. The compatibility, tolerance, and stability of finished products over time are becoming key issues to master. This is therefore a change that goes beyond


the simple replacement of one ingredient for another: it is a technical, sensory, and ethical evolution, serving more responsible cosmetics.


Biocompatibility and microbiome- friendly approach As cosmetic science evolves, the notion of biocompatibility; the capacity of a formulation to interact harmoniously with the skin and its ecosystem; has become a key differentiator. Beyond mere tolerance, biocompatibility embraces the skin’s biological balance, ensuring that formulations respect the integrity of the epidermal barrier and the microbiome, the living community of microorganisms that actively


contributes to skin health. Traditional petrolatum, while inert and non-irritating, creates a highly occlusive film that limits natural exchanges between the skin and its environment. This physical barrier can sometimes disrupt the skin’s physiological renewal processes or alter its microbiota by creating an overly sealed, oxygen-poor environment. In contrast, Natura-Tec’s natural protective


gels are designed with dynamic skin interaction in mind. Their composition—rich in plant-based triglycerides, esters, and naturally occurring fatty acids—mimics the structure of human sebum. This biomimetic approach promotes natural lipid


exchange, enhancing hydration while preserving the skin’s permeability and biological functions. The result is a balance between protection and breathability—what we call a living barrier. The skin microbiome plays a crucial role


in maintaining barrier function, modulating inflammation, and protecting against pathogenic invasion. Formulations that are overly occlusive or that rely on mineral hydrocarbons can unintentionally destabilize this ecosystem. Our 100% natural grades have been developed


to be microbiome-friendly, ensuring non- occlusive protection, allowing the skin flora to breathe and self-regulate. This gentle synergy between the skin and its flora promotes better tolerance, particularly for sensitive, reactive, or


www.personalcaremagazine.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152