search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
FORMULATING 139


The case for naturally pigmented skin care


Theresa Callaghan - Callaghan Consulting International Susan Ayton, Jake Cleary - Ayton Global Research


For decades, skin care creams, lotions, and serums have been expected to be white or colourless. This convention—based on the historical association between whiteness, purity, and stability—has influenced formulation strategies, processing techniques, and consumer perceptions.1


The link


between whiteness and ‘clean’ beauty is deeply rooted in marketing. However, as consumer interest shifts towards sustainable, and inclusive beauty options,


natural,2


this long-standing emphasis on white formulations is being challenged—particularly by ingredient suppliers. The rising demand for natural,3


organic,


and minimally processed ingredients creates inherent conflicts: many high-value natural4 extracts contain characteristic pigments, e.g. green chlorophylls, brown polyphenols, yellow carotenoids, and attempting to remove or conceal these colours often contradicts sustainability principles and incurs unnecessary processing costs.


Natural pigments as markers of phytonutrient activity Many plant-derived compounds responsible for beneficial5


Polyphenols and flavonoids6


contribute to antioxidant pathways, photo- protection, and anti-inflammatory effects. Carotenoids7


skin care effects are naturally coloured. (green to brown)


(yellow to orange) support barrier


integrity, reduce UV-induced oxidative stress, and improve skin tone uniformity. Chlorophyll derivatives (green) exhibit antimicrobial8 wound-healing9


and properties; plant resins, ferments,


and clays possess unique mineral-based hues. Removing or de-pigmenting these compounds


can impair their functionality. Maintaining natural colour preserves biochemical integrity10 supports efficacy.


and


Reduction of unnecessary refinement and chemical processing Standardising colour to pure white often involves activated carbon treatment, bleaching, high filtration, synthetic whiteners, or opacifiers. Each step raises costs, energy use, and risks


degrading bioactive molecules. Non-white skin care aligns with green chemistry principles, lowers processing footprints, and maintains the formulation’s natural complexity.


Colour as an indicator of freshness and stability Natural-coloured products can help visualise


www.personalcaremagazine.com


stability changes over time. Controlled shifts may indicate oxidation or microbial growth, enabling early detection. Instead of concealing these changes with opaque whiteners, embracing inherent colours may enhance quality assurance and consumer trust when paired with transparent communication.


International consumer market research study The industry now faces a turning point, prompting a reassessment of whether whiteness (‘white is pure’) should remain the standard aesthetic or if naturally coloured skin care presents a more scientifically and commercially viable alternative. This change is driven by evolving11


consumer


values and industry priorities. To demonstrate this change, we conducted


an international consumer market research study and present our findings. The objective of the study was to understand whether the traditional preference for white or colourless skin care products remains relevant in today’s beauty landscape and to evaluate how consumers perceive naturally coloured formulations. Specifically, the research aimed to explore shifting attitudes toward colour as an indicator of natural ingredients, efficacy, freshness, and sustainability, given that many beneficial plant- derived compounds are inherently pigmented. By examining global consumer responses, the


ABSTRACT


Skin care has traditionally been formulated to appear white, reinforcing outdated associations between whiteness, purity, and efficacy. However, many beneficial natural ingredients possess inherent colour and refining them to achieve whiteness can reduce bioactivity and increase processing demands. This paper outlines the scientific rationale for retaining natural pigmentation and presents an international survey (n = 1002) assessing consumer attitudes toward non-white formulations. Despite expecting creams to be white, 97% of respondents were willing to use naturally coloured products, with minimal concerns about safety or performance. These findings indicate growing global acceptance of naturally pigmented skin care and support a shift toward more sustainable, authentic formulation practices


study sought to determine the level of acceptance for non-white skin care products, assess whether natural colour enhances or detracts from perceived product quality, and identify how these perceptions align with evolving values around minimal processing, green chemistry, and transparent formulation practices. Overall, the study was designed to provide insight into whether the industry should continue


April 2026 PERSONAL CARE MAGAZINE


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152