search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
12 ANALYSIS


What today’s consumers want from personal care


n Emma Gubisch – Leatherhead Food Research, UK Matt Herd – Sagentia, UK


With consumers’ needs and expectations evolving at pace, it is important for the personal care industry to adapt and realign to meet changing priorities. In this article we will look at recent research that gets to the heart of consumer truth to help drive focused, effective innovation that reflects what people really want from their personal care products. Product development and marketing has


always relied on consumer insight. However, in the digital economy, consumer sentiment can take a sudden turn that leads to lasting changes in demands and expectations. It has never been more important for personal care brands to keep up with what people want, then react intelligently, efficiently and effectively. To get a handle on this dynamic landscape, we recently conducted quantitative and qualitative research with more than 2,000 British adults. Our aim was to drill down into the essence of what today’s consumers want from personal care brands. And some of the answers were surprising. For instance, we anticipated that


environmental sustainability would be on people’s radar. But our survey saw a huge majority (79%) say personal care and beauty brands should put more effort into manufacturing products in an ethical and sustainable way.


Overall, our findings indicate that consumers are looking for purposeful and personalised brand experiences and interactions. Running through all the varied demands and expectations is one common thread: a desire to ‘find the products that work best for me’. However, ‘work best’ means different things


to different people. It is fluid, changeable and hard to define. It can relate to product functionality or practical factors like cutting down the time it takes to style hair or shave in the morning. It can encompass individuals’ environmental goals, such as reducing waste. And it also covers more nebulous feelings related to wellbeing or body image. How can personal care innovation accommodate all of this? Clearly,


PERSONAL CARE EUROPE


ingredients, formulation and chemistry will always be fundamental to products. But advanced consumer services driven by digital capabilities are moving up the agenda. Technology is now a significant factor in the ongoing race to achieve competitive differentiation and meet the needs of an increasingly demanding consumer. Brands that blend of-the- moment consumer insight with technical and digital expertise as well as traditional scientific skills are likely to thrive.


What consumers want Let us examine some of the core findings of our research. As behavioural research teaches us in relation to the human bias of sticking with the status quo, many people expressed an ambivalence towards new products. Overall, 81% said they were ‘happy’ with the products they currently use, with 43% saying they tend to stick to those products and 38% saying they nevertheless enjoy trying new ones. Value for money was the factor mentioned most often when we asked people what influences their choice of products: 67% of all respondents expressed this view, and it was more important for


women (72%) than men (62%). Functional benefits were the second most important criterion, mentioned by 54% of respondents. Again, the figure was higher for women than men, at 62% versus 45%; but it was the younger 18-24 age group that felt most strongly about this factor, with 65% selecting it.


When we asked how brands could


improve the way personal care products work at an individual level, the most popular answer was ‘give me an opportunity to try before I buy’. This was mentioned by 40% of all respondents, but the figure was significantly higher for women at 53% than for men at 27%. On the face of it, the ‘free sample’ route might seem an effective way to tap into the 38% of people who are happy with existing products but enjoy trying new ones. However, it is not quite that straightforward. Our findings related to ethics and sustainability would indicate that the traditional sample model, with its heavy reliance on small single use plastic containers, will become less acceptable to consumers in time. This is just one area of conflict that personal care innovation must resolve. And


April 2020


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196