search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
86 SKIN CARE ****


200 150 100 50 0


0 ***


200 150 100 50 0


6 0 6


40 30 20 10 0


0 6


Figure 6: Effects on corneocyte size, skin excoriation, and Nile red staining in tape-stripped SC.28 A: Corneocyte size, n = 25, ***p<0.001 compared to week 0. Data was analysed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and are presented as mean ± SD. B: Skin excoriation, n = 25, ****p<0.0001 compared to week 0. Data was analysed using a paired t-test and are presented as mean ± SD. C: Nile red staining, n = 25, *p<0.05 compared to week 0. Data was analysed using a paired t-test and are presented as mean ± SD


capable of forming lamellar structures, e.g. CER20,23


may be more effective in enhancing SC


water retention compared to those lacking such structural properties (e.g. HIRU and urea).


Conclusion In this clinical trial, daily application of 10% POLG nano-emulsion for three and six weeks significantly improved symptoms such as dryness, scaling, pruritus, and stinging sensations on non-lesional skin of AD (AD) patients. After three weeks, clinical outcomes were: 12% marked, 8% moderate, 72% slight, and 8% no improvement; at six weeks: 12%, 40.4%, 44%, and 4%, respectively. These results demonstrate favourable


efficacy comparable to pseudo-ceramide and HIRU lotion. Dermatologist assessments confirmed improvements in dryness and pruritus, and capacitance measurements showed increased hydration. However, TEWL did not improve, likely due to the inclusion of mild AD patients with near-normal baseline TEWL (<10 g/m2


/hr) or the limited


barrier-forming ability of POLG compared to acylceramides.22 This trial confirmed the efficacy of POLG nano-emulsion primarily through enhancement of SC hydration, restoring mildly affected skin to near-healthy levels. Notably, improvements in scaling, stinging, and pruritus were observed at both three and six weeks. Visio scan data supported these findings,


showing reduced roughness (SESC) and improved smoothness (SESM). Scaling improvement was also associated with larger corneocytes, suggesting reduced epidermal turnover, decreased scratch marks, and enhanced lipid envelope formation. During the six-week period, spanning


autumn to winter when skin dryness increases, SC hydration rose by 199.7% from baseline. This suggests that POLG promotes lamellar structure formation, binding water in a non-evaporative state. Overall, POLG nano-emulsion likely accelerates lamellar structure development


PERSONAL CARE October 2025 A ****


200 150 100 50 0


0 ****


25 20 15 10 5 0


3 Week 6 0 B **** ** *


3 Week


Figure 7: Effects of POLG nano-emulsion on skin hydration and TEWL.28. A: Skin hydration (Capacitance), n = 25. All data were analysed using Tukey’s multiple comparison test and are presented as mean ± SD. B: Barrier function (TEWL), n=25. All data was analysed using Dunn’s multiple comparison test and are presented as mean ± SD. **p<0.01, ****p<0.0001 compared to week 0


between corneocytes, improving water retention and reducing scaling. Previous trials using CER creams and HIRU


lotion showed that improvements in scaling and pruritus were linked to increases in both hydration and barrier function (TEWL),12,30 suggesting that both are key for symptom relief. In contrast, this study demonstrated that POLG improved these symptoms via hydration alone, without enhancing TEWL, implying that water retention plays a more vital role than barrier repair in relieving scaling and pruritus in mild AD. Barrier dysfunction in atopic dry skin is more


closely tied to sensitivity to external irritants and allergens, such as sweat and mite antigens. PAS (photoacoustic spectroscopy) studies revealed that penetration of hydrophilic substances slightly correlates with TEWL and parallels AD severity,33


serum IgE levels, which are elevated in ˜80% of AD patients.34


showing significant association with This suggests that barrier


impairment increases susceptibility to allergic inflammation triggered by water-soluble


allergens in sweat. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that


POLG nano-emulsion effectively alleviates atopic dry skin symptoms, especially scaling and pruritus, by improving SC hydration via lamellar structure formation, even without enhancing barrier function beyond normal. These findings offer guidance for skin care development, indicating that lamellar-forming agents— regardless of being ceramide derivatives—may be useful for treating mild AD. The ability to relieve dry skin in non-lesional


areas can serve as a marker of moisturizing efficacy. Furthermore, agents effective on atopic dry skin may also be beneficial for non-atopic conditions such as senile xerosis or detergent- induced dryness, providing a broader basis for moisturizer evaluation.


References 1. Imokawa G. Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22 2. Imokawa G. Book Publisher International: London, UK 2021; 1: 2-45


www.personalcaremagazine.com


6


PC


Corneocyte (µm2


)


Water Content (Capacitance)


Thick abrasion (%)


TEWL (g/m2


h)


Nile Red Staining Index (A.U)


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112