search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
50 TRENDING TECHNOLOGIES A DARK EYE CIRCLE 0.15 * 0.05 -0.05 -0.15 Week 0 Week 6 Week 12


-0.50 -1.00


Week 0 Week 6 Week 12 Figure 6: Improvement of skin conditions by repeated oral intake of glucosyl hesperidin4,5


carbonylation and glycation was examined using BSA (Bovine Serum Albumin) as a standard protein. To investigate the anti- carbonylation effect of glucosyl hesperidin, BSA was incubated with sodium hypochlorite, which induces carbonylation. Immunofluorescence staining of


carbonylated BSA was performed, and the fluorescence intensity was used to calculate the relative amount of carbonylated BSA. The addition of glucosyl hesperidin reduced carbonylated BSA in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 7). Next, to investigate its anti-glycation


effect, BSA was incubated with glucose and glucosyl hesperidin, and the relative amounts of carboxymethyllysine and pentosidine, which are representative markers of glycated proteins, were measured by immunofluorescence staining. Glucosyl hesperidin suppressed the production of these two glycated proteins (Figure 8). These results demonstrated the anti-


carbonylation and anti-glycation effects of glucosyl hesperidin, which is also considered to contribute to the improvement of dark circles and dullness, as well as addressing poor circulation.


14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0


Glucosyl hesperidin Glucose (moI/L)


- -


- 0.1 - 0.5


- 1


+ -


+ 0.1 Figure 8: Effect of glucosyl hesperidin on BSA glycation PERSONAL CARE October 2025 www.personalcaremagazine.com + 0.5


+ 1


† p<0.10, * p<0.05 vs. Placebo


Improvement of facial pores Pore enlargement is known to be caused by the overproduction and peroxidation of sebum, as well as hyperkeratosis. In addition, the correlation between the degree of pore enlargement and protein carbonylation in stratum corneum has been reported.10


It


was therefore hypothesized that glucosyl hesperidin could improve facial pores due to its antioxidant and anti-carbonylation effects.


Topical application To confirm the effect on pores, subjects applied a toner containing 0.5% glucosyl hesperidin or a placebo toner twice daily for eight weeks, and the number of visible pores (pore score) was counted using a skin image analysis software. In the group treated with glucosyl hesperidin, the pore score was significantly decreased after eight weeks of application, indicating an improvement in facial pores (Figures 9, 10). Glucosyl hesperidin is therefore effective in making pores appear less visible.


Conclusion Holistic beauty has become a core principle in shaping the future of skincare. Its philosophy not only emphasizes outward appearance, but


CARBOXYMETHYLLYSINE 3


2.5 2


1.5 1


0.5 0


Glucosyl hesperidin Glucose (moI/L)


- -


- 0.1 - 0.5


- 1


+ -


+ 0.1 + 0.5


+ 1


1.2 1


0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0


Sodium hypochlorite


Glucosyl hesperidin (w/v %)


- -


+ -


+ 0.001 + 0.01 + 0.1


Figure 7: Effect of glucosyl hesperidin on BSA carbonylation


also embraces the interconnected health of the body, mind, and lifestyle. Today, environmental responsibility is an


integral part of this vision, with a growing emphasis on sustainability that seeks to promote the wellbeing of both people and the planet.


The ‘beauty from within’ concept reflects PENTOSIDINE


1.00 0.50 0.00


B COMPLEXION *


0.50 0.00


-0.50 -1.00 -1.50


Week 0 Week 6 C SALLOWNESS


+ Week 12 Placebo (N=21) ■ 500 mg glucosyl hesperidin (N=21) ■


∆Hb index Fluorescence intensity (relative)


∆a* value


Fluorescence intensity (relative)


∆b* value Fluorescence intensity (relative)


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112