search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
84 SKIN CARE


and multilamellar architecture is vital for barrier repair.22 To overcome limitations, a synthetic


pseudo-ceramide (pCer), N-(3-hexadecyloxy- 2-hydroxypropyl)-N-2-hydroxyethyl hexadecanamide, was developed. It forms multilamellar vesicles in water and water- retaining lamellae in SC. Clinical data show topical pCer significantly improves xerosis and increases hydration, with residual pCer forming bound water structures similar to natural ceramides.9,20,23,24


Although pCer improved


hydration, it did not alter TEWL, likely due to near-normal baseline values. pCer’s lamellar liquid crystal formation


enhances moisture retention and possibly barrier function. Studies confirm that ≥3.0% pCer improves dryness in both AD and surfactant-damaged skin,1,19,20,21,23,25


supporting


the hypothesis that lamellar structure is key to therapeutic efficacy.22


Clinical effects of a 10% POLG- containing nano-emulsion on non-lesional skin in AD Natural ceramide, even in its synthetic form, is highly expensive and difficult to incorporate into emulsions, which makes it unsuitable for routine topical use in patients with AD or xerotic skin. Pseudo-ceramide (pCer) presents similar limitations, including high cost, restricted availability, and challenges in formulation. To address these issues, we screened a


variety of compounds and identified Phytosteryl/ Octyldodecyl Lauroyl Glutamate (POLG), as a ceramide mimetic moisturizing agent capable of forming multilamellar vesicles and restoring water-retention capacity impaired by treatment with surfactants or organic solvents.26,27 These effects are shown in Figure 1, along


with the corresponding properties of natural ceramide and pseudo-ceramide.19,20,24


POLG


is marketed in Japan by Ajinomoto under the A


5 4 3 2 1


0 0 3 Week 6 ** TABLE 1: COMPOSITION OF CERAMIDE-MIMETIC MOISTURIZING AGENT CONTAINING NANO-EMULSION


■ Water ■ Phytosteryl/Octyldodecyl Lauroyl Glutamate (POLG); 10.0%


■ Glycerin ■ Butylene Glycol ■ Dipropylene Glycol ■ Pentylene Glycol ■ Hydrogenated Lecithin ■ Lactobacillus/Wasabia Japonica Root Ferment Extract


■ Polyglyceryl-10 Laurate ■ Sodium Pyrrolidone Carboxylic Acid ■ Ceramide 3 ■ Pyrrolidone Carboxylic Acid ■ Arginine ■ Aspartic Acid


trade name Eldew™ PS-203. It is cost-effective, can be readily incorporated into emulsions at concentrations above 10%, and exhibits low greasiness, which provides advantages over conventional ceramide-mimetic moisturizing agents. In this study, we investigated whether


the topical application of a nano-emulsion containing 10% POLG to atopic dry skin improves both clinical symptoms and SC hydration. The nano-emulsion used in this study was provided by ToverVert, and its formulation is listed in Table 1.


Effects of six-week application of ceramide-mimetic moisturizing agent containing nano-emulsion on skin symptoms in AD patients28 Dermatologists assessed dryness/scaling, erythema, papules, and excoriations using a 1–5 grading scale (1 = none; 2 = slight; 3 = mild, 4 = moderate; 5 = severe). Irritation and itchiness


B


5 4 3 2 1


0 0 3 Week 6 * ****


■ Glycine ■ Alanine ■ Serine ■ Valine ■ Isoleucine ■ Threonine ■ Proline ■ Histidine ■ Phenylalanine ■ Saccharide Isomerate ■ Rosmarinus Officinalis (Rosemary) Leaf Extract ■ Polyquaternium-51 ■ Lactobacillus Ferment ■ Phenoxyethanol ■ Sodium Lactate


were self-reported using the same scale. The nano-emulsion slightly reduced dryness/scaling at 3 weeks and significantly at six weeks (p<0.01) (Figure 2A). No significant changes were found in erythema, papules, or excoriations at either time point. Irritation (stimulus) improved significantly at three weeks (p<0.001) and six weeks (p<0.0001) (Figure 2B). Itchiness, a key atopic feature, also significantly decreased at three weeks (p<0.05) and six weeks (p<0.0001) (Figure 2C).


Clinical improvement effects of ceramide-mimetic moisturizing agent (POLG) containing nano-emulsion on the skin of patients with AD28 Overall clinical improvement was graded 0–3 (3 = marked, 2= moderate, 1= slight, 0 = none). At three weeks, improvement rates were: 12% marked, 8% moderate, 72% slight, and 8% none. At six weeks: 12%, 40.4%, 44%, and 4%,


C


5 4 3 2 1


0 0 3 Week 6 * ***


5. ■ severe


4. ■ moderate 3. ■ mild 2. ■ slight 1. ■ none


Week 0 0


8 11 6 0


Week 3 0


4 9


12 0


Week 6 0


0 9


16 0


5. ■ severe


4. ■ moderate 3. ■ mild 2. ■ slight 1. ■ none


Week 0 0


4


12 6 3


Week 3 0


0 2


12 11


Week 6 0


0 2 9


14


5. ■ severe


4. ■ moderate 3. ■ mild 2. ■ slight 1. ■ none


Week 0 0


2


10 11 2


Week 3 0


0 4 9


12


Week 6 0


0 2 7


16


Figure 2: Clinical efficacy of ceramide-mimetic moisturizing agent containing nano-emulsion on skin symptoms in patients with AD.28 A: Dryness; B: Stimulus (Irritation); C: Itching. n = 25. *p <0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001 compared to week 0; all data were analysed using Dunn’s multiple comparison test


PERSONAL CARE October 2025 www.personalcaremagazine.com


Dryness


Stimulus


Itching


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112