search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
INTERVERTEBRAL JOINT POLARITY IN SAUROPODS


silicone molding rubber. These molds were used to cast the models in EPO-TEK 301 epoxy, a two-component epoxy that cures at low temperature and exhibits photoelastic properties. To conserve material and enhance optical clarity, casts were poured to a thickness of 1 cm rather than the 3 cm width of the ABS plastic models. Batches of epoxy were limited to 25 g at a time; mixing greater amounts resulted in cloudiness and anomalous birefringence under cross-polarized light, likely due to excess heat generation during the reaction between the two component phases. After pouring, the epoxy models were allowed to cure for a minimum of 24 hours at room temperature. Measurements of the models taken with digital calipers showed a variation in width from 0.82cm to 1.07 cm, including a meniscus of not more than 0.10cm. To test each of the two hypotheses, the


models were first suspended in articulation loaded as cantilevers with a fixed proximal element and a free distal element that could be


rotated relative to it. This was accomplished by fixing one model to a wooden testing rig at its flat end by two 0.62cm (¼ inch) diameter


wooden dowels; these were received by corresponding holes, 0.66cm apart, drilled into the wooden frame and the flat end of the model. This modular setup allowed the proximal element to be switched out between the convex and concave elements to create either a proximally concave or proximally convex joint. To further stabilize the fixed element against rotation, a steel drawer handle with a clearance of 3.2cm was attached below it and lined with foam to prevent damage to the epoxy of the model. The free element was suspended from the rig by a tensile element (either a wire or a string; see below) originating proximally on a metal hook. The hook could be moved up and down to vary the angle of rotation of the free element and the insertion angle of the tensile element. To allow this, the hook was screwed into a separate wooden board bolted to the back of the wooden frame via a vertical slot. The board could be moved vertically when the bolts were loosened and, with the bolts tightened, stayed firmly in one position regardless of the load applied. This testing rig is shown in Supplementary Figure 2,


631


where it is configured for the rotational stability experiments. The hypothesis that proximally concave


centra distribute forces more evenly across the articular surface than do proximally convex centra was tested using photoelastic analysis. The principles and applications of photoelastic analysis are detailed by Post (1979) and are summarized only briefly here. Photoelastic materials are optically isotropic in anunstrained state, and therefore appear dark when viewed under cross-polarized light. The introduction of strain produces anisotropy in the index of refraction of the material, meaning that light travels through thematerial at a different speed depending on the direction in which the light vibrates. When viewed under cross-polarized light, rays passing through the material are out of phase and therefore interfere, resulting in birefringence. The greater the strain in the material is, the greater the difference in velocity between the rayswill be, and the light observed will have a progressively higher-order inter- ference color.Using this technique, the distribu- tion of strain in a material can be observed and the relative magnitude of stress assessed. The EPO-TEK 301 epoxy used to create the models described above is a photoelastic material with a typical index of refraction of 1.519 at 23°C (Epoxy Technology, Inc. 2012). The models, which were unstrained as a result of the molding and casting process, exhibited a slight biaxial anisotropy with first-order gray inter- ference colors. Strain-visualization experiments were


conducted using the wooden testing frame described above. The epoxy models were modified with the addition of a metal hook on the top and bottom surface, providing a strong attachment for the tensile element and heavy weights. In each model, a 1.1cm deep hole was drilled into the top and bottom surface, into which was placed a 1.6cm metal cup hook. The hole was placed 2cm from the flat end to prevent the strain associated with drilling the hole and applying forces to the hook from overprinting experimentally induced strain at the articular surface. The hooks were set into the holes with epoxy, rather than screwed in, creating a strong bond to the epoxy model without introducing additional strain. For each


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192