PHYSICOCHEMICAL CONTROLS ON FORAMINIFERAL SIZE
605
TABLE 3. The order (i.e., step) of environmental variables added to the model in order to best predict the distribution of (log10-transformed) volume–to–surface area ratio from Pacific waters with ≥3 ml/liter and <3 ml/liter of dissolved oxygen (top to bottom). AIC and BIC values are reported as the difference (∆) between the model in question and the model with the lowest reported value. Our model-selection process considers both AIC and BIC values, and if two models yielded similar values we selected the simpler model (i.e., the model with the fewer environmental predictor variables).
Predictor
Pacific ≥3 ml/liter Temperature Oxygen
POC flux
Calcite saturation state Best model
Pacific <3 ml/liter Temperature Oxygen
POC flux
Calcite saturation state Best model
Step
Null model 1 2 3 4
Null model 1 2 3 4
df 1
2 3 4 5
2 3 4 5
both Pacific and Atlantic waters with more than 3 ml/liter [O2], variations in temperature elicit the greatest change in test morphology due to their effect on metabolic rates. The general trend of the contour lines in
Deviance 102.3
101.3 101.2 101.0 101.0
104.3 102.8 100.3 100.2 100.2
∆AIC 15.7
0.7 0.1 0.0 1.9
log10 volume–to–surface area ~ temperature 1
58.6 37.5 0.0 1.8 3.8
log10 volume–to–surface area ~ temperature + oxygen
Figure 6 supports our findings from empirical test size and volume–to–surface area ratio data from North American continental margin. For purposes of illustration, we have assumed that other variables included in the model are constants. In nature, however, parameters such as organism metabolic rate and cytoplasmic streaming velocity vary among species and environments. Because cell morphology can be maintained under changing environmental conditions by varying these parameters, contour lines are not hard constraints on test volume–to–surface area but instead can be interpreted as lines of approximately equal selective pressure on it. We overlay our empirical data on Figure 6 by plotting the mean temperature and dissolved oxygen con- centration of foraminifera that have test volume–to–surface area ratios <0.05mm (square), 0.05–0.2mm (triangle), and >0.2mm (circle); benthic foraminiferal test volume– to–surface area ratios in the North American data set span 0.012mm to 0.32mm. The mean temperature and dissolved oxygen values for these three groupings of test volume– to–surface area ratio are consistent with the selective pressures implied by equation (2) and illustrated in Figure 6.
trations exert a significant influence over both the size and volume–to–surface area ratio of benthic foraminifera from the North American continental margin. Similar metabolic controls over these two different measures of morphol- ogy suggest that most of the response of benthic foraminiferal test volume–to–surface area ratios to environmental pressures is through changes in test volume rather than changes in volume–to–surface area ratio at a constant size. In other words, the primary mechanism by which foraminifera vary in surface area-to-volume ratio is by differences in size, rather than differences in the ratios of lengths of the primary axes. Thus, benthic foraminifera appear to use the same physiolo- gical mechanism for changes in test volume and volume–to–surface area ratio.
Temperature and dissolved oxygen concen-
Implications for the Benthic Foraminiferal Fossil Record
The metabolic controls that shape patterns in
the spatial distribution of modern benthic foraminiferal test size and volume–to–surface area ratio around the North American continental margin may shed new light on the causes of both short- and long-term patterns of morphological evolution in the foraminiferal fossil record. Specifically, the results presented herein show that temperature is the most important control in the physical environment
∆BIC 9.4
0.0 4.9
10.3 17.6
47.8 32.2 0.0 7.2
14.6
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180 |
Page 181 |
Page 182 |
Page 183 |
Page 184 |
Page 185 |
Page 186 |
Page 187 |
Page 188 |
Page 189 |
Page 190 |
Page 191 |
Page 192