search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Paleobiology, 42(4), 2016, pp. 574–594 DOI: 10.1017/pab.2016.20


Ediacaran distributions in space and time: testing assemblage concepts of earliest macroscopic body fossils


Thomas H. Boag, Simon A. F. Darroch, and Marc Laflamme


Abstract.—The mid-late Ediacaran Period (~579–541Ma) is characterized by globally distributed marine soft-bodied organisms of unclear phylogenetic affinities colloquially called the “Ediacara biota.” Despite an absence of systematic agreement, previous workers have tested for underlying factors that may control the occurrence of Ediacaran macrofossils in space and time. Three taxonomically distinct “assemblages,” termed the Avalon, White Sea, and Nama, were identified and informally incorporated into Ediacaran biostratigraphy. After ~15 years of new fossil discoveries and taxonomic revision, we retest the validity of these assemblages using a comprehensive database of Ediacaran macrofossil occurrences. Using multivariate analysis, we also test the degree to which taphonomy, time, and paleoenvironment explain the taxonomic composition of these assemblages. We find that: (1) the three assemblages remain distinct taxonomic groupings; (2) there is little support for a large-scale litho-taphonomic bias present in the Ediacaran; and (3) there is significant chronostratigraphic overlap between the taxonomically and geographically distinct Avalonian and White Sea assemblages ca. 560–557Ma. Furthermore, both assemblages show narrow bathymetric ranges, reinforcing that they were paleoenvironmental–ecological biotopes and spatially restricted in marine settings. Meanwhile, the Nama assemblage appears to be a unique faunal stage, defined by a global loss of diversity, coincident with a noted expansion of bathymetrically unrestricted, long-ranging Ediacara taxa. These data reinforce that Ediacaran biodiversity and stratigraphic ranges of its representative taxa must first statistically account for varying likelihood of preservation at a local scale to ultimately aggregate the Ediacaran macrofossil record into a global biostratigraphic context.


Thomas H. Boag* and Marc Laflamme. Department of Chemical and Physical Sciences, University of Toronto Mississauga, 3359 Mississauga Road,Mississauga, Ontario, L5L 1C6, Canada. E-mail: tomboag@stanford.edu, marc.laflamme@utoronto.ca. *Present address: Department of Geological Sciences, Stanford University, 450 Serra Mall Building 320, Room 118, Stanford, California, 94305-2215, U.S.A.


Simon A. F. Darroch. Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Vanderbilt University, 5726 Stevenson Center, 7th Floor, Nashville, Tennessee, 37240, U.S.A. E-mail: simon.a.darroch@vanderbilt.edu


Accepted: 12 April 2016 Published online: 25 May 2016 Data available from the Dryad Digital Repository: http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.1mh30


Introduction The Ediacaran Period (635–541Ma) represents


a critical interval in the evolution of complex life, bridging the microscopic eukaryotic groups of the Cryogenian (Bosak et al. 2012; Riedman et al. 2014) to the eventual radiation of macro- scopic animal life that epitomizes the Cambrian explosion(Erwinetal.


2011). Cambrian


Lagerstätten such asChengjiang and the Burgess Shale are pivotal to our understanding of the diversification of phylum-level animal clades, yet they tell us comparatively little about perplexing stem- and crown-group metazoan origins, which sit protractedly in the late Neoproterozoic (Peterson et al. 2004, 2008; Erwin et al. 2011). Furthermore, Ediacaran-aged fossil assemblages represent the earliest


© 2016 The Paleontological Society. All rights reserved.


evolution of complex ecological interactions such as bioturbation and predation, often hypothe- sized to be the requisite biological drivers for the Cambrian explosion of morphological innovation (Stanley 1976; Bengston and Zhao 1992; Peterson and Butterfield 2005; Sperling et al. 2013). To address these questions, heightened


interest has focused on the intermediary Ediacaran fossil record, dominated by a globally distributed marine assemblage of multicellular organisms colloquially referred to as the “Ediacara biota” (Narbonne 2005). These macrofossils, restricted in this study to lineages of large, soft-bodied organisms predominantly preserved as casts and


molds of Ediacaran age (Laflamme et al. 2013), first appear after the Gaskiers glaciation


0094-8373/16


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192