706
JOSHUA MIKE ET AL.
Galloway, J. J., and H. V. Kaska. 1957. Genus Pentremites and its species. Geological Society of America Memoir 69:1–114.
Lieberman,D. E., J. Carlo,M. P. de León, and C. P. Zollikofer. 2007. A geometric morphometric analysis of heterochrony in the cra- nium of chimpanzees and bonobos. Journal of Human Evolution 52:647–662.
Lipman, Y., R. Al-Aifari, and I. Daubechies. 2013. The continuous Procrustes distance between two surfaces. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 66:934–964.
Macurda, D. B., Jr. 1966. The ontogeny of theMississippian blastoid Orophocrinus. Journal of Paleontology 40:92–124.
——. 1975. The Pentremites (Blastoidea) of the Burlington Limestone (Mississippian). Journal of Paleontology 49:346–373.
Maderbacher, M., C. Bauer, J. Herler, L. Postl, L. Makasa, and C. Sturmbauer. 2008. Assessment of traditional versus geometric morphometrics for discriminating populations of the Tropheus moorii species complex (Teleostei: Cichlidae), a Lake Tanganyika model for allopatric speciation. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 46:153–161.
Mitteroecker, P., P. Gunz, G.W.Weber, and F. L. Bookstein. 2004. Regional dissociated heterochrony in multivariate analysis. Annals of Anatomy–Anatomischer Anzeiger 186:463–470.
Mitteroecker, P., P. Gunz, and F. L. Bookstein. 2005. Heterochrony and geometric morphometrics: a comparison of cranial growth in Pan paniscus versus Pan troglodytes. Evolution and Development 7:244–258.
Piras, P., F. Marcolini, P. Raia, M. Curcio, and T. Kotsakis. 2010. Ecophenotypic variation and phylogenetic inheritance in first lower molar shape of extant Italian populations of Microtus (Terricola) savii (Rodentia). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 99:632–647.
Reyment, R. A., F. L. Bookstein, K. G. McKenzie, and S. Majoran. 1988. Ecophenotypic variation in Mutilus pumilus (Ostracoda) from Australia, studied by canonical variate analysis and tensor biometrics. Journal ofMicropalaeontology 7:11–20.
Rohlf, F. J. 1998. On applications of geometric morphometrics to studies of ontogeny and phylogeny. Systematic Biology 47:147–158.
Sheets, H. D., K. Kim, and C. E. Mitchell. 2004. A combined land- mark and outline-based approach to ontogenetic shape change in the Ordovician trilobite Triarthrus becki. Pp. 67–82 in A.M.T. Elewa, ed. Morphometrics: applications in biology and paleontology. Springer Verlag, Berlin.
Sokal, R. R., and F. J. Rohlf. 2012. Biometry: the principles and prac- tices of statistics in biological research, 4th ed. Freeman,NewYork.
Tan, P., M. Steinbach, and V. Kumar. 2005. Introduction to data mining. Addison-Wesley, Boston. Villemant, C., G. Simbolotti, andM. Kenis. 2007. Discrimination of Eubazus (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) sibling species using geometric morphometrics analysis of wing venation. Systematic Entomology 32:625–634.
Waters, J. A., A. S. Horowitz, and D. B. Macurda. 1985. Ontogeny and phylogeny of the Carboniferous blastoids Pentremites. Journal of Paleontology 59:701–712.
Wilk, J., and R. Bieler. 2009. Ecophenotypic variation in the Flat Tree Oyster, Isognomon alatus (Bivalvia: Isognomonidae), across a tidal microhabitat
gradient.Marine Biology Research 5:155–163.
Zelditch,M. L., D. L. Swiderski, and H. D. Sheets. 2012. Geometric morphometrics for biologists: a primer. Academic, London.
Zollikofer, C. P. E., and M. S. Ponce De León. 2004. Kinematics of cranial ontogeny: heterotopy, heterochrony, and geometric morphometric analysis of growth models. Journal of Experi- mental Zoology Part B 302:322–334.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180 |
Page 181 |
Page 182 |
Page 183 |
Page 184 |
Page 185 |
Page 186 |
Page 187 |
Page 188 |
Page 189 |
Page 190 |
Page 191 |
Page 192
