search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
52 TESTING CONTROL A PAS M FURFUR M. FURFUR + KTZ


B LY


Figure 2: Representative images of reconstructed human epidermis uncolonized (Control) or colonized byMalassezia furfur in the presence of Ketoconazole (M. furfur + KTZ) or not (M. furfur). A: Periodic acid-Schiff staining of paraffin-embedded epidermis. B: Lucifer yellow fluorescence after out/in epidermal barrier diffusion assay


the epidermal barrier (Figure 2A). A slight thickening of the epidermis was also observed in the presence of the yeast. Additionally, as expected, addition of KTZ weakened the multiplication of M. furfur, therefore reducing the invasion of the epidermal barrier. In order to evaluate this barrier disruption,


we performed a transepidermal Lucifer yellow (LY) diffusion assay on colonized RHE. LY is essentially a fluorescent dye able to diffuse from the outside to the inside layers of a tissue if the intercellular spaces are enlarged, typically like in disrupted RHE. Both the quantification of fluorescence in


the culture media after diffusion of the dye throughout the RHE and the quantification of remaining fluorescence in paraffin-embedded RHE, reflect the permeability of the RHE. In the case of M. furfur-colonized RHE, LY applied on the stratum corneum was able to diffuse to the basal layer, as observed by fluorescent images (Figure 2B) and by quantification in the culture media (Figure 3). In contrast, treatment with KTZ reduced M.


furfur intrusion to allow an accumulation of green dye in the top layer of the RHE (Figure 2B)


450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0


and a resulting lower quantity of fluorescence in the culture media (Figure 3). Altogether, those data confirmed that the invasive yeast clearly declined the outside/inside epidermal barrier of the RHE, in a KTZ-limiting way. Impact on gene expression The observation of the disrupted barrier led us to investigate deeper the impact of M. furfur on the response of the tissue to this invasive stress. To this end, we conducted a RT-qPCR gene expression analysis (Figure 4) and observed that the expression of genes playing role in the structure of the barrier such as loricrin, filaggrin, desmoglein, or keratin-1, -10 and -14 was statistically downregulated. Additionally, the expression of genes coding


for the matrix metalloproteinases MMP-1 and -9 involved in the turnover of extracellular matrix components were upregulated. Regarding the expression of inflammatory genes, we observed that the expression of the interleukins IL-1- alpha, IL-1-beta, IL-8, and IL-23A genes were upregulated, up to 140-fold time for the IL-8 gene. Similarly, the expression fold change of


defensin genes like the Human Defensin DEFB4A gene or the antimicrobial psoriasin


200 150 100


35 -5


15 0


S100A7 gene were around 150 time overexpressed. This extended transcriptomic analysis confirmed the effective activation of the immune response following M. furfur colonization, as well as an impairment of the epidermal structure, at the gene level.


Secretion of protein biomarkers In order to support those transcriptomic data, we aimed to quantify the release of some proinflammatory mediators. As described earlier, the RT-qPCR analysis revealed a particularly significant overexpression of IL-8 and DEFB4A genes. Given the major involvement of these two


biomarkers in the response to infection, we selected two specific ELISA assays measuring the Human Beta Defensin 2 (HBD-2, encoded by the gene DEFB4A) and the IL-8 cytokines to define the respective levels of those proteins in the culture media of RHE colonized with M. furfur, in the presence or absence of KTZ. In harmony with the previously obtained


RT-qPCR results, ELISA assays demonstrated that M. furfur significantly induces the secretion of HBD-2 and IL-8 proteins in the culture media, by a respective fivefold and tenfold change


M. furfur


Figure 3: Quantification of out/in Lucifer Yellow diffusion through the stratum corneum of reconstructed human epidermis uncolonized (Control) or colonized byMalassezia furfur in the presence of Ketoconazole (M. furfur + KTZ) or not (M. furfur).


0 hour PERSONAL CARE November 2022


M. furfur


M. furfur + KTZ


Figure 4: Analysis of inflammatory, innate immunity and epidermal genes differentially expressed in reconstructed human epidermis colonized by Malassezia furfur during three days. Changes in gene expression are expressed as fold to control (uncolonized reconstructed human epidermis). DEFB4A: Human Beta Defensin 4A - DSG1: Desmoglein 1 - FLG: Filaggrin - IL’s: Interleukins - KRT’s: Keratins - LOR: Loricrin - MMP’s: Matrix Metalloproteinases - S100A7: Psoriasin


www.personalcaremagazine.com


Lucifer Yellow diffusion (% relative to Control)


mRNA expression (fold change to control)


DEFB4A


S100A7 IL-1 alpha IL-1 beta


IL-8 IL-23A


MMP-1 MMP-9 KRT-1 KRT-10 KRT-14 LOR FLG DSG1


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92