search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
32 ANTI-POLLUTION


reacting them with a small tertiary amine and quaternizing with methyl chloride, dimethyl sulphate or diethylsulphate. For these next- generation products, Stepan chose the greener route, using sunflower oil instead of a palm- derived fatty acid. This resulted in several benefits, as listed below. ■ Reduction of the chemical transformation steps ■ Local and sustainable supply chain. The sourcing of oil from sunflower seeds grown in the United States for Esterquat 1 and sunflower seeds grown in France and Spain for Esterquat 2, ensures the renewability of the feedstock and avoids the deforestation issues linked to standard palm oil ■ Much lower melt point due to the high degree of unsaturation of the oil, allowing for a high-active, low melt-point product without the need for flammable solvents As a result, Esterquat 1 and Esterquat 2 do


not contain any water, solvent nor preservative. Esterquat 1 comprises 95% total cationic and emollient actives, while Esterquat 2 comprises 100% actives. This fits the sustainability expectation for concentrated ingredients that enable transportation and storage optimisation. Thanks to its liquid form, the product is


not only easy to handle, but is also able to decrease the need for heating while formulating hair conditioners or masks. While BTAC-based formulations require heating to around 80°C, formulating with Stepan’s novel esterquats can be done at 65°C, contributing to energy savings. The third pillar is ensuring they meet technical


performance requirements. As these esterquats are derived from sunflower oil, their carbon chain distribution is supposed to be more optimal for hair applications than palm-based esterquats. That is due to the high amounts of the unsaturated oleic acid (C18:1). This degree of unsaturation is believed to


assist in coating and lubricating the hair for ease of combing. To verify this assumption, Stepan used a Dia-Stron instrument to measure the force needed to pull a comb through a


BEFORE NO TREATMENT (shampoo only) CONTROL


300 250 200 150 100 50 0


Shampoo Only


Conditioner Base


Figure 3: Wet combability test


standardized tress of wet hair. The greater the force required to comb through, the poorer the conditioning performance. Figure 3 shows the result of a wet


combability test. To simulate damaged hair, the tress tested was bleached Caucasian hair. The first bar corresponds to shampooed and rinsed hair, unconditioned. The second bar is the base conditioning formulation without the cationic conditioning agent. Present in this base are fatty alcohols and


cellulose thickening agents typically used in hair conditioners to provide viscosity and to stabilize the formulation. As expected for these two samples, combing forces are high, due to the absence of conditioning agents. When a 2% active conditioning agent is


added to the base, the force needed to comb through hair is significantly reduced by all the cationic conditioning agents, showing easier detangling. However, CETAC and palm-based esterquats are not premium performers. Only Esterquat 1 was able to equal the performance of the leading chemistry, BTAC. The same testing was repeated with


dry combing and with Asian hair, and each produced similar results.


AFTER TREATMENT BTAC


AFTER 2nd SHAMPOO


ESTERQUAT 2


ESTERQUAT 2 No build-up effect


Stepan also studied the deposition of these


esterquats onto the hair fibre and assessed its substantivity. To do so, a modified Rubine test using the anionic Red 80 dye was performed. This anionic dye serves to reveal the presence of a cationic conditioning agent onto keratin, the main component of hair. Tresses of bleached Caucasian hair were


washed with a non-conditioning shampoo and rinsed thoroughly. A 2% active cationic conditioner was applied, and the hair was rinsed once more. The tresses were then dipped into a Red 80 dye solution, drained to removed excess solution, rinsed and left to dry overnight. Figure 4 shows the final observation of the


dry hair tresses, as follows. ■ Control (tress 1) that was only shampooed showed no trace of dye ■ The BTAC-treated hair (tress 2) showed some pinkish areas, resulting in a heterogeneous, low presence of BTAC ■ The Esterquat 2-treated tress was uniformly left bright red (tress 3), proving its superior substantivity towards the hair and suggesting that the effect of this esterquat could last longer than the time spent under the shower However, substantivity can be a


disadvantage when the conditioning agent keeps accumulating onto the hair surface, which eventually leads to a greasy and heavy appearance of the hair. That is why a second shampoo was performed on the Esterquat 2-treated hair tress (tress 4). After rinsing and drying, tress 4 was back


to its initial state (Figure 4). This indicates that the esterquat was eliminated through this next shampoo and rinsing, and would not contribute to buildup.


Conclusion Today’s consumers want more from their hair conditioners. Stepan’s novel esterquats for hair conditioning were developed to fulfill their performance requirements and demand for more sustainably advantaged products.


References 1. Cope R. 2022 Mintel Consulting Sustainability Barometer. Mintel. 2022


Figure 4: Final observation of the dry hair tresses PERSONAL CARE November 2022


2. de Bellefonds C. Brainy Beauty: Can Anti- Pollution Skin Care Really Protect Your Skin? Healthline Media. 2020


www.personalcaremagazine.com PC BTAC CETAC


Palm-based Esterquat


Esterquat 1


Maximum load (gmf)


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92