58 TESTING
Figure 4: TEWL measurements for all kinds of applications.
Assessing nails and eyes Up until now, there are not that many measurement methods that are used for the assessment of nails. Studies have revealed that healthy nails have a much higher water loss than one would expect, being higher than the TEWL of the skin and behaving differently.9,10 Also, an age-dependency could be shown.11 Therefore, TOWL measurement will hint at
nail health and can be used to demonstrate the effect of hand and nail care and products such as nail polish or polish remover. Leaving the skin altogether, another field of
application is the measurement of the water loss from the eye surface. With a healthy and stable tear film, ocular water loss is limited. For people with dry eye symptoms, an increased water loss can be measured using a modified TEWL probe.12
Ocular water loss could be an
interesting parameter to study the impact of products used on the eye such as contact lenses or the creeping effect of products applied close to the eye.
In vitro TEWL Last but not least, TEWL measurements play an increasing role in the field of in vitro studies on cultured tissue. The use of skin tissue models for long-
term safety tests is a quick and easy method to avoid using animals or volunteers and allow economic pre-tests to see the efficacy of products. Meanwhile in vitro tests have been well established in various guidelines around the globe.13 Besides using a probe in a special shape to fit on the Franz cell’s membrane, there are systems available to measure TEWL in a well plate with up to 24 cultured tissue wells simultaneously. The acquired data have many uses in this field. From the initial check of the
PERSONAL CARE EUROPE
quality of cell cultures, the assertion of constant test conditions outside the incubator as the TEWL threshold avoids too dry/too moist conditions for product application, up to the barrier function effect of applied products, the TEWL measurement is indispensable for safety & efficacy assessments because even small effects are detectable and the measurement helps to separate experimental stress effect by the condition inside and outside the incubator from tested product’s effect.
Conclusion No wonder that a multi-informational parameter as the Transepidermal Water Loss is indispensable for all kind of cosmetic, pharmaceutical and medical applications and beyond.
References 1 Berardesca E, Loden M, Serup J, Masson P,
Rodrigues LM. The revised EEMCO guidance for the in vivo measurement of water in the
skin, Skin Res Technol. 2018;24:351–358 2 Information video on the Tewameter® (youtube):
https://youtu.be/wlwJstCwFfU
TM Hex
3 Basal metabolic rate, Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basal_metabolic_ rate
4 Braun N, Binder S, Grosch H et al. Current Data on Effects of Long-Term Missions on the International Space Station on Skin Physiological Parameters, Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2019; 32:43-51
5 Agren J, Sjörs G, Sedin G. Ambient Humidity Influences the Rate of Skin Barrier Maturation in Extremely Preterm Infants, J Pediatr. 2006;148(5):613-617.
PC
6 Yonezawa K, Haruna M, Matsuzaki M, Shiraishi M, Kojima R. Effects of moisturizing skincare on skin barrier function and the prevention of skin problems in 3-month-old infants: A randomized controlled trial, Journal of Dermatology 2018; 45: 24–30.
7 Vazquez-Gonzalez ML, Rodriguez G, Rubio L, et al. Intelligent ageing repair with skin superfoods, Personal Care Europe 2019; 157- 162.
8 Khazaka D, Uhl C. Nails: more than just skin extensions, Personal Care Asia Pacific 2018; 33- 35
9 Krönauer C, Gfesser M, Ring J, Abeck D. Transonychial water loss in healthy and diseased nails, Acta Derm Venereol. 2001;81(3):175-177.
10 Jemec GB, Agner T, Serup J, Transonychial water loss: relation to sex, age and nail-plate thickness. Br J Dermatol. 1989;121(4):443-446.
11 Jeon HS, Youn SW, Jeon HE, Kim JH, Hyon JY. Assessment of Transepidermal Water Loss From the Ocular Area in Dry Eye Disease, IOVS 2016; 57: 11; 4835
Figure 5: Assessing TEWL in 24 cultured tissue wells simultaneously.
12 European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM) guidelines:
https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/eurl/ecvam
September 2020
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92