PRESERVATIVES 69
Next generation preservation options
n Jan Gauczinski, Cezanne Vielkanowitz, Nicolas Lasbistes – Clariant, Switzerland
The protection from microorganisms is absolutely necessary to ensure consumer safety during the shelf life and use of a cosmetic product. And with consultants estimating that by the year 2020 more than 50% of all consumers could live in tropical regions with humid climates,1
the demand
for particularly high quality cosmetics with a long shelf life will further increase. However, after fragrances, the
preservatives contained in cosmetics are the most common cause of skin complaints. Along with formaldehyde and parabens, isothiazolinone, used in shampoos and bubble baths, is often among the substances responsible for allergies and skin irritation.2,3
The demand for natural formulations
and therefore preservation accepted in natural standards is on the increase, but even natural ingredients such as tea tree oil can result in skin irritation and allergies, especially because they must often be used in relatively high doses in order to be effective.4,5
As the industry searches for effective additional preservation strategies, formulators face the challenge of balancing increasing consumer needs and their own needs with the limited current options available. Today’s consumers want effective, natural and safe products and ingredients they can trust on a long-term basis. Formulators need to meet regulatory requirements and market demands with alternative preservative systems that offer equivalent performance at comparable costs. Solutions that are effective at low concentration and offer ease of formulation are a priority.
Choosing the right preservative involves a wide range of considerations from formulation type and pH values, to the target spectrum of activity towards bacteria, yeast and molds, and regulations of the target region. Adding to the complexity, usually several different preservatives are required in order to adequately protect a formulation.
Crucial to the development of more November 2017 Abstract
The introduction of innovative alternatives to less consumer-accepted ingredients is expanding the available toolbox of preservation options for safer and more sustainable personal care applications. New additions to Clariant’s portfolio of liquid blends based on 100% renewable sorbitan caprylate offer an easy switch for formulators looking to replace specific ingredients and achieve a different claim or pursue green certification. They address consumer and formulator needs, supporting development of safe and natural products which are equally functional and cost effective. This article highlights the efficacy of the new options at low concentrations for rinse-off and leave-on, alongside an advance for challenging high aqueous formulations.
natural cosmetics, preservatives are often what hinders formulations in achieving green certification. To fill the gaps that exist for formulators in balancing extensive modern preservation needs, Clariant has extended its current portfolio of easy-to-handle liquid blends based on 100% renewable sorbitan caprylate. The latest developments presented in this article include those with an even higher sustainability profile and expand available alternatives for
formulators looking to replace specific ingredients and achieve a different claim and/or green certification.
Natural sorbitan caprylate basis Renewable, biodegradable sorbitan caprylate is a non-toxic, Ecocert and Cosmos approved booster of preservative systems. It is China IECIC listed. The Environmental Defense Fund (EDF)6 recently placed it top in its Preservation Innovation Project (PIP) rankings assessing
Table 1: Sorbitan caprylate: synergism with preservatives (MIC in %). Velsan SC >1
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Staphylococcus aureus Penicillium minioluteum
Velsan SC 0.25
Velsan SC 0.2
Sorbic Acid 0.2
Phenoxyethanol 0.25
Benzyl Alcohol 0.25
50:50 blend 0.25
50:50 blend 0.032
95:5 blend 0.1
PERSONAL CARE ASIA PACIFIC
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96