This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Trans RINA, Vol 156, Part C1, Intl J Marine Design, Jan - Dec 2014


THE POTENTIAL FOR SURFACE DISRUPTION TECHNIQUES IN THE AESTHETIC EVOLUTION OF SUPERYACHTS


T Nelson, EBDIG-IRC, Coventry University, UK (DOI No: 10.3940/rina.ijmd.2014.c1.25)


SUMMARY


Superyachts are some of the largest man-made structures designed outside of the discipline of architecture, but as their sizes have increased over the years, there has been little change in the aesthetic treatment of their surfaces. This scaling- up of design features has often resulted in the creation of amorphous, incoherent and incongruous masses of steel and aluminium.


Superyachts spend a large proportion of their existences in-dock, stationary aside from the movement of the water. We can therefore justify analysing them within the context of architecture, where buildings with such vast expanses of unbroken white surface are rarely seen. When such instances do occur, criticism soon follows – the Benthem Crouwel Wing of the Stedelijk Museum in Amsterdam has been dubbed ‘The Bathtub’, and is widely derided. Whilst no such formalised and directed criticism of superyacht design exists as yet, there is clearly an opportunity for a rethink.


This paper summarises research and development activities, where in-depth visual analysis of contemporary architecture has informed design output. The body of this paper discusses methodologies for expansive surface disruption in superyacht design. These methodologies (which advocate the progressive adoption of design approaches from the world of contemporary architecture) are beginning to inform marine design projects, the first of which has been analysed within the context of both the superyacht industry and architectural practice.


1. INTRODUCTION


As superyachts continue to increase in size, should their design language change? Currently, the largest superyacht in the world is 180m in length (see Figure 1) [1], yet shares much aesthetically with craft ten (or more) times smaller. Can we continue to scale-up this design language ad infinitum?


Ranking Name of Yacht 1 Azzam 2


Eclipse


3 Dubai 4 Al Said 5 Topaz


5 Prince Abdulaziz 7 El Horriya 8 Yas


9 Victory 10


Al Salamah


Length (m) 180


162.5 162 155 147 147


145.72 141 140 139


Figure 1: List of the World’s Largest Superyachts [1] It is difficult to question


the beauty of superyachts


without context. Perhaps this is why the vast majority of press images show superyachts at sea, without any other visual reference that might reveal their true scale. When we are given backgrounds in these images, they are typically landscapes of


epic grandeur (for example,


mountains or coastlines). Superyachts are rarely pictured when in port, where they may spend up to 75%


of


buildings, they appear incongruous: vast swathes of largely uninterrupted


tessellated constructions in brick, timber and metal.


This paper sets out to question whether lessons might be learned from the only other field of design operating at this scale: architecture. There are very few examples of façades


in architecture with such large un-textured,


uninterrupted surfaces. Indeed there is a large sector of the construction industry concerned with the design of both structural and decorative architectural elements and treatments. When buildings are designed like superyachts the results are contentious [4] [5].


At only 100m in length (roofline level), the Benthem Crouwel Wing of the Stedelijk Museum in Amsterdam (Figures 2-3) is a minnow in comparison with the very largest superyachts. Its smooth white façade is composed of 271 Twaron® composite panels, seamlessly blended together. This is a material more often used for marine and aerospace


applications [3]. The looking building building than the new Stedelijk


their time [2]. When viewed alongside coastal white surfaces


float alongside


was


unveiled in September 2012 to a mixed reception. Michael Kimmelman, architecture critic for the New York Times wrote: ‘Offhand I can’t recall seeing a more ridiculous


Museum, which recently opened here.’ [4] The L.A. Times’ architecture critic Christopher Hawthorne undermined the lead architect’s attempt to endear the public to the new annex by nicknaming it ‘the bathtub’: ‘Mels Crouwel dubbed his new addition to Amsterdam's Museumplein the 'bathtub,' a fitting description for such an oversized, antiseptic and mismatched design.’ [5]


©2014: The Royal Institution of Naval Architects


C-41


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188