This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Trans RINA, Vol 156, Part C1, Intl J Marine Design, Jan –Dec 2014


2.5 THE OVERALL MARKET PRODUCT LIFE CYCLE.


Before any design activity is undertaken it is important that the proposed design be positioned into the market with a clear strategy of the unique selling points of that vessel. The WFSV has grown very quickly and whilst growing is effectively still in the R and D phase with new designs coming onto the global market on a weekly basis. At the beginning of any market there is normally one or two innovators and as the market grows there are new entrants. As the competition grows and starts to mature the market consolidates with boat builders or operators exiting the market or being taken over by stronger competitors. For all stakeholders it is important


to know exactly where your positioned with the rest of product is the market to create a


strategic advantage. For example; you might have an existing product, and choose to readdress the design for manufacturability and cost reduction, but if the design does not meet the future state requirements then it is probably


not worth the investment but rather


concentrating on a new design. Yet this older design if cost reduced to a market break point on the price may extend the life of the product [21, 24, 27, 6, 7 & 11].


comfort or safety. Many of these vessels are being laid up or converted for different use, albeit they have not paid of the finance and many have negative equity. This being the case a solid Specification and Future state process needs to be undertaken before any design activity can take place or deemed viable.


3. THE IMPORTANCE OF SPECIFICATION FOR STRATEGIC ADVANTAGE


Before any design or manufacture can start on any product there needs to be a robust process for determination of


the specification. As with the


examples from history there were a distinct set of requirements that had to be met and these have a profound effect on the


design and manufacturing


process. The wind farm industry is a good example of how the specifications have changed over a short period of time and increased the number of stakeholder interests. To the point that vessels less than 6 years old are technically redundant and being laid up. At the core of the KPM model is the Design Value Proposition (DVP) for the charter company [8, 11, 12, 24, 23 & 21].


the


Figure 2.3 Market product life cycle and competition


Whilst the latter would ordinarily be a viable strategy where a hull engine combination proves to be a winning combination and the vessel evolved on this proven platform, it has been complicated by the round requirements. Traditionally the round 1 vessels could range from 14-19meters , with round 2 larger and round three from 24 meters and upwards and having a multi role use. In a market that is considered to be a capital purchase the life cycle turns and evolutions are very short of around 2 years which was last seen during WWII. In a commercially driven market this life cycle turn creates a great deal of financial risk.


In addition


the market is learning and the demands on the vessel capability and comfort are increasing, putting pressure on the designers and boat builders and owners. Many vessels that were produced less than 6 years ago are now technically obsolete and no longer suitable for the purpose that they were intended, due to performance,


C-124 Figure 3 KPM model for vessel strategic advantage


Whilst the vessel owner is the initial customer they still have a series of stakeholders that must be satisfied for the design to be viable in the market who are the charter companies. For example; consideration and importance of the criteria need to be determined for the following: the boat owner, the boat funder, the naval architects, the class societies the TEC’s and the boat yard. The second tier of the model includes the OE suppliers and most importantly the legacy use of the vessel. The importance of having a methodology is vital since if any one of these criteria are ignored then the vessel design will be impaired and as a consequence the financial success of the project. For example; the boat owner may choose not to class the vessel which


©2014: The Royal Institution of Naval Architects


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188