This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Trans RINA, Vol 156, Part C1, Intl J Marine Design, Jan –Dec 2014


There is therefore a need to integrate the crash analysis and NVH analysis into a single design optimisation process. Adduri et al [29] demonstrated a design system to efficiently perform optimisation based on responses computed from multiple LS-DYNA analysis while also taking into consideration the linear loading conditions such as those for NVH and static responses. The design system ESLDYNA is based on Equivalent Static Load (ESL) method, which requires the iterative process of non-linear structural analysis (LS-DYNA) and linear structural analysis and optimisation (GENESIS). They carried out the topometry optimization of a full vehicle model for frontal crash, static stiffness and normal modes. This approach would be necessary to optimise the CLF to minimise structural


crumple zone energy absorption. However it has been found that this method has serious extreme non-linear buckling


was observed [24].


Combining topology and NVH using this process is also questionable as NVH is dependent on the density and mass location. Since topology only gives an indicative mass fraction which is not conducive for accurately predicting the NVH response.


Lilja [30] presents a selection of benchmark problems that verify the capability of new features in LS-DYNA to conform to the DNV-RP-C208, recommended practices on


the usage of non-linear implicit finite element


simulations in offshore applications. These practices will be used for investigations, studies and dimensioning of offshore structures in the future. Given the high speed nature of the CLF and the need to optimise for both crash and


NVH, recommended practices for topometry


optimisation will be required. Christensen et al [31] have conducted research into lightweight Body In White (BIW)


design and lightweight crash structure


development utilising structural optimisation. This is a very different approach to the static loading conditions used in Naval Architecture. Developing new vessel structural


design methodologies based on structural


optimisation for crash and associated design rules would enhance the survivability of large next generation high speed craft such as the CLF through reducing the kinetic energy being transferred to the occupants.


The process of evacuation of potentially infirm


passengers, who have just experienced significant HIC or other trauma, has nothing to do with current maritime evacuation technology. It would have more in common with a paramedic team arriving at a car accident. Passengers would become patients in need of acute treatment and immobilisation onto stretchers. Extraction to medical facilities would be time critical as with car accidents. Given that these vessels could be coastal cruisers helicopter evacuation could be a feasible option. There may also be a potential for life boats


with


advanced medical facilities. Given the size of modern life boats it may be possible to have one as a floating medical facility for acute patients with the vessel medical officer present. Another approach would be the use of a medical


vibration and maximise limitation when


technician to stabilise patients in medically equipped lifeboats which could be helicopter airlifted to hospitals.


Advanced


systems developed in the automotive industry, are capable of predicting post-crash injury


Automatic Crash Notification (AACN) severity and


subsequent automatic transfer of injury assessment data to emergency medical services. If applied to the CLF this could potentially improve the timeliness and appropriateness of care provided given the potential number of casualties. The estimation of injury severity based on statistical field data, as incorporated in current AACN systems, lack specificity and accuracy to identify the risk of life threatening conditions. To enhance the existing AACN framework, Bose et al [32] developed a computational methodology to predict


injury risk for


motor vehicle crash victims. Their objective was to predict risk of injury in specific body regions, from AIS (body Abbreviated Injury Scales), based on specific characteristics of the crash, occupant and vehicle. The computational technique involved multibody models of the vehicle and the occupant to simulate the case-specific occupant dynamics and subsequently predict the injury risk using established physical metrics. To demonstrate the computational-based injury prediction methodology, three frontal crash cases involving adult


drivers in


passenger cars were extracted from the US National Automotive Sampling System Crashworthiness Data System. The representative vehicle model, anthropometrically scaled model of the occupant and kinematic information related to the crash cases, selected at different


severities, were used for the blinded


verification of injury risk estimations in five different body regions. When compared to existing statistical algorithms, their computational methodology


was


suggesting a significant improvement toward post-crash injury


prediction specifically tailored to individual


attributes of the crash. Variations in the initial posture of the driver, analyzed as a pre-crash variable, were shown to have a significant effect on the injury risk.


Injury prediction based on data from event data recorders in automatic collision notification is expected to reduce trauma deaths. Known to affect on injury, the crash pattern is required to be classified to accurately predict injury profiles of each crash pattern. A method to classify a crash pattern by comparing vehicle acceleration with the typical profiles was found to be effective. They performed multi-body simulations with a vehicle interior and a dummy model, and developed injury prediction algorithms of each crash pattern. This approach will be applied to the risk analysis of the GA in further work. As it is a critical aspect of equipment location.


evacuation planning and


The risk of explosion of the LNG tank and associated loss of hydrostatic stability presents a significant challenge, given the potential increase in evacuation time over a conventional vessel. Further structural analysis will address the challenges posed by LNG tanks. The use


C-148


©2014: The Royal Institution of Naval Architects


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188