search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
66


ANTI-AGEING


Dryness stress PME


800 600 400 200 0


** **


(-) (-)


(Dunnett’s test, n=6; **: p<0.05).


of dermis in a non-invasive way by measuring the collagen density. For example, on a female test subject in her fifties in the PME lotion group, it was observed that a four-week application of the lotion increased the thickness of the dermis (Figure 5a). Moreover, results on 14 test subjects indicated the thickness of dermis of the PME lotion group significantly increased in 12 weeks compared to 0 week (Figure 5b). In the questionnaire carried out before the


test, seven test subjects, with men and women combined, reported their subjective symptoms of dry skin. As a result of stratified analysis on these test subjects, the PME lotion group showed a significant increase in the thickness of dermis as compared to the placebo lotion group at four weeks (Figure 5c). This result suggests that PME may take effect on people with dry-type skin at an earlier stage.


Effects on crow’s feet & neck wrinkles As the effect of PME on improving dermal thinning was confirmed, we evaluated its effect on wrinkles next. We compared crow’s feet in the group that applied the PME lotion for 12 weeks and found that


50s Japanese female (lower eyelid)


the depth of wrinkles significantly reduced. The tendency to improve wrinkles was


confirmed in comparison with the placebo lotion group. In the example images of a male in his sixties, the overall wrinkle improvement effect was confirmed regardless of the depth of wrinkles (Figure 6a). Regarding neck wrinkles, the PME lotion group at 12 weeks showed significant reduction as compared to the placebo lotion group at 0 weeks. In images of the neck, overall wrinkle improvement effect was seen, similar to crow’s feet (Figure 6b). We also conducted a 90-day clinical test on 53


test subjects in a third-party institution. In this test, we evaluated crow’s feet, upper area between the eyebrows, as well as smile lines, under the supervision of a dermatologist before the application of PME lotion and after applying the lotion for 30 days, 60 days, and 90 days. The PME lotion group showed significant improvements in all parts as compared to the placebo lotion group (data not shown).


Evaluation In this study, it has been clarified that the


4000 3000 2000 1000 0


(+) (-)


(+) (+)


High pH stress PME


800 600 400 200 0


** **


(-) (-)


(+) (-)


(+) (+)


UVB stress PME


800 600 400 200 0


** **


(-) (-)


(+) (-)


(+) (+)


Figure 3: Effect of PME against stress factors (dryness, high-pH, and UVB) In the care of dryness and high-pH stresses, NHEK (AD) were incubated with 0.1% PME, whereas NHEK (NB) were incubated with 0.01% PME only in the care of UVB stress. Results are expressed as mean ±S.E.


***


***


Control


RA


LG


Figure 4: Evaluation of active components in PME NHEK (AD) was subjected to dry stress by replacing the medium


after the addition of RA and LG as pretreatment. RA: Rosmarinic acid, LG: Luteolin-7-O-glucuronide. The results are expressed as mean ±S.E. (Dunnett’s test, n=6, *** p<0.01).


increase in the eATP level is accelerated not only by natural ageing but also by environmental stress and that it induces dermal thinning. Although it is known that eATP increases when inflammation occurs8


,


the study results have suggested that eATP of NHEK in the upstream of SASP also functions as a ‘danger signal’ of natural ageing and influences the decomposition of the dermal matrix through interaction between the epidermis and dermis. Environmental stresses, such as dryness,


UP A 0 weeks


120 110 100 90


1% PME lotion * Placebo lotion *: p<0.10 vs.0 week 0 week 4 week 12 week B 4 weeks


120 110 100 90


1% PME lotion ** Placebo lotion **: p<0.05 0 week 4 week


Figure 5: Effect of PME on the thickness of dermis The internal image of the skin of a female in her 50s is shown in Figure 5A. The thickness of dermis is indicated by arrows. The analysis of the


dermal thickness is shown in Figure 5B. The results are expressed as mean ±S.E. (Student’s t-test, N=14; *: p<0.10). The analysis of the dermal thickness of seven people with dry skin is shown in Figure 4C. The results are expressed as mean ±S.E. (Student’s t-test, n=7; ##: p<0.05)


PERSONAL CARE October 2021


high pH and exposure to UVB, are believed to increase the level of eATP and cause dermal thinning. Moreover, it has been confirmed that when dryness stress or high pH stress is applied, the level of eATP in NHEK (AD) increased two- fold compared to that in NHEK (NB) (data not included), suggesting that NHEK (AD) is more susceptible to these stressors. According to recent study reports, when


irritated by physical stress, ATP is released through the maxi-anion channel and connexin hemichannel present on the cell membrane.12,13 Meanwhile, ATP/P2Y2 receptor signals are drastically increased when there is irritation or inflammation.14


Therefore, in this study,


it is assumed that ATP released into the extracellular environment via the ATP channel on the epidermal keratinocyte membrane activates ATP receptors such as P2X and P2Y receptors,14,15


the use of PME improves the condition of dermal thinning. Therefore, we believe that suppressing the level of eATP improves the


www.personalcaremagazine.com


promoting the production of SASP


factors. In this effectiveness test on human subjects,


Thickness of the dermis (%)


(Relative value %) eATP level


Thickness ofdermis Thickness of the dermis (%)


(Relative value %) eATP level


(Luminescence unit) eATP level


(Relative value %) eATP level


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92