search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
SKIN PROTECTION 89


Microalgal strategy against UV and blue light hazards


n Liliane Pellegrini, Max Pellegrini, Aurélie Zamboni – Gelyma, France Francine Joly – Sephra, France


UV and blue light exposure induces specific as well as overlapping and synergistic effects on the skin, consequently inducing important damages. UVA radiation (320 - 400 nm) penetrates deeply in the dermal layers, generating reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (ROS and RNS respectively) that alter proteins, lipids and DNA. It therefore contributes to premature skin ageing, wrinkle formation with a risk of cancer through the formation of oxidised DNA bases.


UVB radiation (290 - 320 nm) is biologically very active. It penetrates the superficial layers of the skin up to the basal layer of the epidermis, where it also generates dangerous ROS and RCS (reactive carbonyl species) leading to inflammation, sunburn and skin ageing. The high-energy photons of UVB can also be directly absorbed by cell’s DNA bases that cause mutagenic lesions and mutations in skin cells, associated to skin cancer development. Visible light presents a high energy visible zone (HEV) between 380 - 495 nm, that corresponds to blue-violet. It is also generated, indoors, by artificial sources such as electronic devices e.g. cell phones and computers as well as LED lighting. It also penetrates deeply into biological tissues and about 20% reach the hypodermis. However it affects the skin differently than UV rays without any association with sunburn and skin cancer. It can cause photoageing and formation of age spots as UVA and UVB through many ways, especially oxidative damages. So, UV exposure as well as high energy blue-light exposure, generate ROS that contributes to skin ageing. Consequently, the prevention of such exposure became a big health concern. Nowadays, skin protection is no longer the only focus of the effects of UV radiation. Indeed, other wavelengths, such as blue light, also induce damaging effects on skin. It appears that a UVA/UVB sunscreen may not be sufficient to bring a global protection. Skin should also be protected


November 2019 Abstract


Until recently, skin protection was mainly focused on the effects of UV radiation on skin. However, we nowadays need to take into account the damaging effects of other wavelengths, in particular blue light. Indeed, blue light penetrates deeper into the skin than UV rays. It represents 50% of the energy emitted by the sun and almost 100% of the energy emitted by artificial sources. It appears that regular sunscreens may not be sufficient to bring a global protection. , developed and sold by Gelyma, provides an efficient and overall skin


Sun’Alg®


protection against the harmful damage caused by the exposure to UV radiation as well as to blue light. It therefore helps to minimise signs of premature photoageing.


from HEV light/blue light exposure. It is well demonstrated that an application of a UVA/UVB sunscreen is unable to inhibit free radicals generated by visible light, whereas the addition of a combination of antioxidants to the formulation significantly reduces their number by 54%.1


Moreover a


cream with a SPF 50 and high UVA protection appears only efficient at 53% against solar-generated ROS without any protection against visible light induced ROS.2


Antioxidants are naturally present in human skin to provide protection from solar assaults but the protective capacity of the skin is rapidly depleted by even moderate UV light exposure.3


The irradiation of the human skin with blue-violet light also induces dose- dependent significant degradation of the epidermal antioxidants.4 Consequently, it appears important to neutralise the influence of reactive species emitted from visible radiation, in particular from the blue light, in addition to an efficient UVA/UVB protection and to consider the additional protective benefits of carotenoids.


Botanical antioxidants have been


reported to have a good potential as photoprotective agents.5


offer a high capacity to produce antioxidative compounds6


Microalgae also and a great


potential to protect skin from damage caused by UV irradiation7-8 light irradiation.9


concern Tetraselmis suecica7


These algal species and also


as well as by blue


SA is stable to temperature (80°C) and UVA/UVB irradiation and it is non


PERSONAL CARE ASIA PACIFIC


Scenedesmus rubescens.8-9 Our claim was to investigate the cutaneous photoprotective effects of other microalgal species, in particular Haematococcus pluvialis (red state) and Dunaliella salina, both known to be rich in carotenoids.


Material and methods Preparation of the microalgal complex The microalgal complex studied named Sun’Alg (SA) was prepared from Haematococcus pluvialis (red state) and Dunaliella salina in Pongamia glabra seed oil (Karanja seed oil).


INCI name is: Pongamia glabra seed oil (and) Dunaliella Salina/Haematococcus Pluvialis extract.


This 100% natural complex contains:


l 96% (w/w) Pongamia glabra seed oil (Karanja seed oil, deodorised grade) provides a primary shield against UV radiation, acting as a natural sunscreen thanks to its high absorption ability especially for UVB but also for UVA.


l 4% (w/w) two microalgal extracts (2% each) bring additional protective capacity against the oxidative stress thanks to their mixed carotenoids composition: l Dunaliella salina is mainly rich in β−carotene,


l Haematococcus pluvialis (red state) is mostly rich in astaxanthin.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120