search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Nationwide lawmakers and regulatory bodies will be monitoring the way sports betting companies advertise and promote their services very closely as advertising continues to flood the airways.


Lawmakers are unlikely to endorse any federal legislation on the issue but lawmakers will continue to fine tune regulations in order to protect players with a special emphasis on protecting minors.


has put strict rules in place. Affiliate sites must disclose their business partnerships with New York operators.


In addition, the NYSGC ruled that New York sports betting affiliate marketers cannot use language that may be “false, deceptive, or misleading.” It is also an issue that the board could come back to at some point if there are any problems with affiliates in the future with NYSGC Chairman Brian O’Dwyer warning that this was possible.


Meanwhile, bill S1550 sponsored by Democrats Senator Leroy Comrie and co- sponsored by Senator Luis R. Sepúlveda would require sports betting ads to include warnings about the addictive potential of gambling. Te New York State Senate passed the bill by a 57-0 vote in May.


One issue that has been worrying lawmakers in particular is the reach of sports betting at colleges. In March 2023 the U.S. gambling industry announced that it was adopting a new responsible marketing code that would ban sports books from partnering with colleges to promote sports betting, bar payments to college and amateur athletes for using their name, image or likeness, and end the use of the terms “free” or “risk-free” to describe promotional bets amongst other measures.


However, Massachusetts already bans partnerships between universities and gambling companies. Lawmakers in Maryland approved bill SB620 in April 2023 with unanimous support. Te bill prohibits state universities from entering into marketing deals with sportsbooks. It was approved by the Governor in July. Going into effect in the same month was a similar bill in Connecticut House Bill No. 5232 which prohibited public institutions of higher education from receiving money for soliciting students to gamble online. New York banned advertising sports betting near colleges and universities in the state in October 2023.


Other much broader efforts to curtail gambling ads are afoot elsewhere. In Louisiana where retail sports betting launched in October 2021 and online betting became available in January 2022 New Orleans-based lawmaker State Rep. Shaun Mena has authored House Bill 727 which would ban online sports betting advertising.


Although the bill is unlikely to pass it does show that concerns are growing over gambling related harm as sports betting increases.


“I am not proposing that we ban online sports betting, not at all — I just want to ban the advertisement of it. I'm fighting for the young men and women who are addicted to these products. Young men under the age of 35 are the largest demographic of online gambling addicts,” Mena said.


Yet while sports betting advertising remains widespread there is growing research to suggest that advertising spend may well be decreasing. In fact at this year’s Super Bowl only three sports-betting ads were broadcast fewer than the maximum allowed.


A recent Nielsen study commissioned by the American Gaming Association reported that “total advertising spend related to sports betting (including Daily Fantasy Sports (DFS) declined $210m compared to 2022, a 15 per cent decline. Excluding DFS, sports betting ad spending was down 21 per cent from 2022. Sports betting ad volume was down four per cent year-over-year across all channels, having contracted 20 per cent from the 2021 peak.”


At the same time, TV which is the largest category for sports-betting advertisers advertising volume “declined more—11%—and has decreased 33 per cent since 2021,” the study found. Just days after the market launched in Ohio the Ohio Casino Control Commission notified BetMGM, Caesars and DraftKings of violations in their ads. Caesars and BetMGM eventually each paid $150,000 in fines and DraftKings paid $500,000 to resolve two separate cases according to local press.


Nationwide lawmakers and regulatory bodies will be monitoring the way sports betting companies advertise and promote their services very closely as advertising continues to flood the airways. Lawmakers are unlikely to endorse any federal legislation on the issue but lawmakers will continue to fine tune regulations in order to protect players with a special emphasis on protecting minors.


More restrictions will follow as the US comes to grips with its growing sports betting market.


Lawmakers in Maryland approved bill SB620 in April 2023 with unanimous support. The bill prohibits state universities from


entering into marketing deals with sportsbooks. It was approved by the Governor in July. Going into effect in the same month was a similar bill in Connecticut House Bill No. 5232.


WIRE / PULSE / INSIGHT / REPORTS P119


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176