This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Trans RINA, Vol 157, Part C1, Intl J Marine Design, Jan - Dec 2015


cruise industry where a “fun ship” image was presented which attracted many passengers who would have never have had the opportunity to travel on the superliners of the 1930s


and1940s. These ships concentrated on


creating a casual environment and providing extensive on-board entertainment. There was a shift in emphasis from transporting people in luxury, to a destination, to the voyage itself. This democratisation of the luxury cruising has changed it from its elitist beginnings into something more accessible to a larger and growing market [2].Over the years, cruise lines have expanded itineraries to include more diverse ports of call and convenient embarkation ports and have also introduced innovative onboard amenities and facilities that rival land-based options. These activities have supported the significant growth of the industry sector [3]. Modern cruise ships are a combination floating resort hotel, sightseeing vessel, gourmet


restaurant, food court,


nightclub, shopping center, entertainment complex, and recreation facility. Cruises offer a range of services, from the utilitarian offerings of transportation, lodging, and meals, to the intangible hedonic


benefits embedded in


symbolic, emotional, and pampered


personal


service. Cruise programs feature all manner of participatory social and learning options, from parties for passengers with shared hobbies or interests, sporting contests, and games, to wine-tasting and art auctions, dance lessons, expert


lectures, cooking and dessert- making demonstrations, computer classes, and more.[4]


Carnival Cruise Lines redefined both the aesthetic of the cruise vacation itself and the public’s perception of cruising. In 1970, only a small number of Americans had ever been on an ocean cruise, and few would have considered it an option. The launch of the TV show The Love Boat in 1977 supported the visibility of cruising and constructed the popular image of what a cruise vacation was all about. By 1988, word of cruising had begun to spread, and more than 3 million had taken a cruise of three days or longer. By the 1990s, cruising had become the fastest-growing segment of the vacation business, and by 1997 the North American cruise industry was carrying nearly 5 million passengers annually and was worth over US$7 billion. This democratization of leisure cruising by Carnival Cruise Lines,


from an elite option for the wealthy to an


increasingly popular mass-market vacation for all, demonstrates the desire for an aesthetic of pleasure and accessibility that meshes particularly well with late 20th- century myths of classlessness in the United States, and with constructs of American national identity that favor and uplift notions of non-pretentiousness, playfulness, and inclusiveness. Kolberg [5] argues that Carnival cruise ships embody


an aesthetic of overflowing


juxtaposition and freneticism that seeks to symbolically annihilate class differences and redistribute power by enacting neoliberal


fantasies of freedom, access, and democracy as enacted in the marketplace.


The initial design team for Carnival cruise ships responsible for constructing a dreamworld of fun was lead by Joe ‘‘entertainment


Farcus as an implementation of architecture’’ approach to interior


his


architecture for all of the Carnival branded ships. This aesthetic style merged popular icons from across time periods and from across geographical boundaries. These interiors were glitzy, shiny, tangible worlds of color. Farcus used light and colour innovations to construct the ‘‘fourth dimension’’, or sense of time through computer- controlled dimmers constantly, although slowly and almost imperceptibly, changing the colors of the lights, resulting in vibrant hues creating the dramatic illusion that the entire atrium


Carnival’s early ships embodied exuberance and excess. Carnivals


Fantasy class,


itself was changing color. also conveyed a sort of


accessible over-the-top attitude. The garish style of Carnival, with its constant juxtaposition, presented the ships as demarcated worlds apart in which passengers were encouraged to cast aside the attitudes and activities of their everyday lives. Carnival cruise ships were marketed as spaces in which people from all walks of life could supposedly be united in their pursuit of the eye- catching, and the self-consciously garish. This aesthetic was in stark contrast to the sleek and minimal style of up market cruise lines, embodying an aesthetic of accessible excess with the design meaning of theme parks and shopping centres, as opposed to the aesthetic of refinement. In constructing their democratized spaces of leisure, Farcus embraced an aesthetic of play and made concerted efforts to diverge class striation.[5]


Carnival’s deliberate construction of playful juxtaposition


embodied the ethos melange. The interiors of postmodern overflowed with historical


juxtaposition, cultural borrowing, and a wide range of signifiers from the past, most of which were utilized to signify good times in the present. The cruise ship as a design format has been particularly adept at depicting this postmodern style. While the sparkle of a Carnival cruise ship helped construct a fantasy realm, the shiny metallic surfaces and glittering lights also associated the Carnival aesthetic with that of discos and themed hotels, as popular spaces of leisure. [5]


In 1999 the Voyager of the Sea was launched by Royal Caribbean International (RCI) marked a significant change in Emotional Design for the user.


It was 30%


larger in displacement than contemporary cruise ships and capable of carrying more than 3,800 passengers. It had new innovative design elements, including: an ice- skating rink; a nine-hole miniature golf course; an in-line skating track; a full-size basketball court; a shopping promenade; a rock-climbing wall on the rear of the ship’s funnel. These amenities were in addition to the numerous bars and restaurants, spa, fitness center, pools, theater, disco, casino, video arcade, children’s play zone, and balconied cabins also found on many new cruise ships. RCI launched the Freedom of


the Seas in 2006, at 158,000 ton, which featured the industry’s first “aqua


© 2015: The Royal Institution of Naval Architects


C-15


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210