This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Trans RINA, Vol 157, Part C1, Intl J Marine Design, Jan - Dec 2015


of familiarity with their presence, this would help to put them at ease.


The GA of the medical support vessel was developed to be operated as an Ebola treatment unit. Where the requirements for isolation and mitigation for infection control were implemented. Ebola treatment units must have strict access control, triage and security; staff and logistics areas must be separate from patient areas with infection control procedures of the highest standard. The design and flow of staff and patients have been pre- designed to mitigate contamination. The use of a pontoon platform allows the medical support vessel to be moored according to security risk. Where there is a low risk of security the vessel can be moored at a port or similar infrastructure, as shown in. Where there is a high security risk the platform can be moored in shallow water with logistics of patients achieved using high speed craft and hovercraft. In terms of internal security the use of automatic doors and wristband scanning sensors, secures patients within their


designated areas and give staff


secure access to storage and key facilities. Having pontoon access to the medical support vessel ensures a strict control of access. These measures are critical given that fear, mistrust and misinformation within affected communities lead some to believe that medical staff brought the virus to the country. This has resulted in people refusing to cooperate with medical personnel, helping patients escape isolation wards and exhibiting hostile behaviour.


Large volumes of water and waste must be managed on the medical support vessel with a strict implementation of infection control principles. This is achieved using water treated to 0.5% and 0.05% Chlorine. Potable water must


The uncertainties about the location, magnitude and nature of the next disaster are constant challenges for humanitarian response and underline the importance of preparedness and flexibility in terms of supply chain set- ups and management. In order to maximise effectiveness field hospitals and foreign medical teams must


be be available based on an estimated daily


consumption of at least 20,000L, which is produced by the water makers, which must also produce sufficient water to also meet the needs of disaster relief supply. These units have high energy consumption in order to reduce the energy consumption of the water makers from the diesel generators, the authors


will examine the


potential of solar panels and wind turbines to power the water makers.[5]


Having the medical support vessel established as an existing health facility would help to restore the public faith in the local health system. The adaptability of the medical support vessel interior to respond to the change in triage needs of an Ebola treatment unit is critical. It is facilitated by the extensive laboratory testing capability of


the vessel. When it comes to level of services


delivered to host countries during disaster responses, two views are proposed. The first is that FMTs should provide services to the level to which the host country can sustain. The second is that services should be provided to the level needed and to which FMTs can supply. In the proposal of the fleet of medical support vessels, the vessel could have two modes of operation. Local hospital provision where the 1st floor of the vessel


integrated into the local health system. The decision to deploy and the scale of deployment rely heavily on context and nature of the event. Hence, a rapid assessment of needs/gaps, capacities and vulnerabilities is critical for an appropriate tailored response including team profiles and equipment. Individual agencies cannot effectively carry out this task alone, nor would multiple providers working without


[5] This floating field hospital regional network would be fully integrated into local healthcare


inter-agency collaboration. system. The


network would be operated as a joint venture between local Government, NGOs and UN agencies, with a UN disaster management


established between all stakeholders. For this reason each medical support vessel has an office with collective disaster management capability within the fleet, through the use of augmented reality technology and clearly defined SOPs which involve video conferencing with local Governments NGOs and other key stakeholders.


expensive components of a disaster response, accounting for 80% of the total expenditure. Where efficient delivery, transportation and


distribution deployment is critical of


logistics are vital parts of relief operations. Maintaining the fleet of medical support vessels in state of readiness for


to have an effective and


efficient response time. The ideal scenario being that the vessel is made ready for delivery and the FMT are in place within one day and the vessel can then be towed to theatre of operation within 2 days. Fleet maintenance and supply could be achieved in a cost effective manner through a series of port based distribution centres based


© 2015: The Royal Institution of Naval Architects C-173


Several studies have identified logistics as one of the most


command centre and SOP


is operated by local health care authorities as a hospital with support and training from NGOs, the 2nd floor is mothballed for disaster relief. the 3rd floor is used for regional training and development programmes with the accommodation for visiting FMT and other development project. Training local staff would only be to the level of services that


they can sustain independently. In this


scenario there would be a total of 30 vessels. There would be regular use of the 2nd floor by NGO foreign medical teams for specialist surgery, this would be predicated upon the availability of a local hospital bed ashore in case an emergency was announced. When disaster is announced patients could be transferred from the 1st floor


to 2nd floor of another vessel, foreign


medical team flown in and 15 of the 30 medical vessels could be towed to the disaster area, the first two of which would arrive within 3 days. The


rationale for the


development of a fleet of 30 medical support vessel would be the significantly reduced construction and operational costs, compared to land based structures.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210