This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
FORMULATING


the surface of the skin cell where it will slowly diffuse into the cell.


 Absorption – Where an active ingredient directly passes unaided across the skin or cell membrane where it begins to work. This is the basic technology for percutaneous absorption, and probably the major pathway that is used by cosmetic chemists.


Formulation


The basic structure of an emulsion is well known but the selection of emulsifiers and lately the selection of the emollient are undergoing much closer scrutiny.


Emulsifiers Originally, soap was the first emulsifier used. Sodium stearate however has some major drawbacks. It is somewhat insoluble, actually causing the product to gel at levels above 5% (note: 8% is used to solidify products such as deodorant sticks). It has low oil carrying capacity and it is only effective in alkaline conditions (otherwise it hydrolyses back to the fatty acid). Later, triethanolamine stearate was used proving to be more soluble and hence higher levels could be used (also increasing the oil carrying capacity). The pH was also lower but still in the mild alkaline region for best stability. With the advent of synthetic surfactants in the 1950s, sodium lauryl sulfate was used (Aqueous Cream BP) although the use of sodium lauryl sulfate provides such stable emulsions that they do not absorb into the skin readily. They are best used for cleansers or sunscreens that you do want to absorb into skin. pH was also lower with an ideal range of 5.5 to 8, lower than 5.5 hydrolysis occurs with loss of emulsification power. Cationics have been used to a minor extent, particularly where the additional benefits of antiseptic efficacy is desired. These have not had widespread acceptance due to their poor stability profile, cationic surfactants being poor emulsifiers. The BP lists Cetrimide Cream BP. Still, they are substantive to skin and may assist in holding the active ingredient on the skin to aid absorption. Later the use of cetomacrogol 1000 (or now called ceteareth-20) or ICI’s extensive development of ethoxylated fatty alcohols and sorbitan derivatives allowed nonionic emulsions to be formed having a wide range of pH values, excellent penetration characteristics and a vast range of applications (from water-in-oil emulsions to wetting agents to oil-in-water emulsions to solubilised oil phases depending on the Hydrophilic-Lipophilic Balance (HLB) chosen). The BP contains formulations for Cetomacrogol Cream BP and Sorbolene Cream BP.


The use of a correct emulsifier for skin lightening products depends both on the active ingredient used for skin lightening and on the type and quantity of emollients used. The only time the selection of a correct emulsifier is of major concern is when there is a compatibility concern. For example, when using ascorbic acid or kojic acid, a low pH is required for maximum chemical stability of the drug. At low pHs there are certain emulsifiers, such as sodium lauryl sulfate, that are not stable. In these cases an acid stable emulsifier should be selected.


Emollients


Again early emulsions, reported in such august publications as the British Parmacopoeia, used an emollient phase based on paraffin liquid (or mineral oil), petrolatum and paraffin wax. These are extremely stable (being predominantly alkanes) but the penetration is very poor, because they are large stable molecules. Vegetable oils became popular, particularly during the ’70s with the push towards so-called ‘natural’ materials. Note: I have begun calling mineral oil, petrolatum and paraffin wax ‘putrefied wood extracts’ to reflect their true origin.


Still, the vegetable oils, although offering a slight improvement in absorption (probably because they were more compatible with the triglycerides found in the skin lipids), were still quite slow to absorb.


The ’60s and ’70’s saw the expansion of synthetic esters (condensation products made from short chain fatty acids with short chain fatty alcohols, a typical example would be decyl oleate). The widespread use of isopropyl myristate


and isopropyl palmitate in the ’70s was halted recently with the discovery that they implicated in the formation of adult acne (i.e. are comedogenic materials). Still, it must be said that not all synthetic esters are comedogenic, but it can also be said that they offer the cosmetic chemists a vast array of options to affect the percutaneous absorption of cosmetic products. For those who wish to pursue this area I will refer you to an award winning paper by Dr Johann Weichers (of Uniqema Holland) entitled ‘Formulating for Efficacy’ where he outlines a procedure for selection of water phase and oil phase in relationship to drug type, for best efficacy. Other common materials used are cetyl alcohol, stearic acid and glyceryl monostearate that do little for absorption and are only used for their consistency contributing factor. We have also had to endure the change in perception from consumers that have seen oils such a whale oil or mink oil discouraged; fortunately we have found more than adequate replacements with vegetable squalane, jojoba oil and other more exotic emollients. It is known that short chain emollients and straight chain emollients have better absorption characteristics than long chain or branched chain emollients. Emollients that are polyunsaturated also seem to have better penetration characteristics than unsaturated emollients. If they have better penetration characteristics, they also seem to assist with drug delivery.


An interesting oil, finding its way into some formulations, is emu oil. Due to emu oil’s lack of phospholipids it appears to be an excellent oil for skin penetration, and as an anti-inflammatory commonly used in preparations for arthritis.


Intercellular route Transcellular route


Plasma


membrane


Cell


cytoplasm


Fatty acid


Intrinsic protein


Intercellular space


Lipid


Aqueous Figure 2: The intercellular channels. April 2012 PERSONAL CARE 123


Ceramide


Cholesterol/ Cholesterol sulfate


Lipid


Keratin


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152