search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Dermis


Epidermis


18 ANTI-POLLUTION


* p<0.0001 versus non-treated zone ** p<0.0001 versus non-treated zone and placebo


45 40 35 * 30 **


1. Polysaccharide complex: Film forming / enhances skin barrier


1. Po


2. Cress sprout extract: Activates detoxification / antioxidant enzymes


25 Film


2. Cre Act


3. Art Pro


20 Placebo 2% Depolluphane


Figure 6: Decrease in quantity of particulate matter which still adheres to the skin after rinsing.


assessed via RT-qPCR. Results showed that the antioxidant enzyme NQO1 was moderately stimulated at 0.05% and strongly stimulated at 0.2 % cress sprout extract (Fig 3). HO-1 and TrxR1 were both stimulated strongly, even at the lower cress sprout extract concentration.


A cress sprout extract protects against protein damage caused by pollution Particulate matter from air pollution can enter the skin and cause oxidisation reactions within the skin through the formation of free radicals. These oxidisation reactions damage important cell components such as proteins and lipids, and thus contribute to inflammation and skin ageing. The cress sprout extract which was shown as an efficient inducer of antioxidant enzymes could protect against pollution-induced protein damage. In order to test the protective effect of


the cress sprout extract against particulate matter, normal human dermal fibroblasts were either pretreated or not (PM control) with 1% cress sprout extract for a period of 7 hours. Subsequently, the medium containing the cress sprout extract was removed and the assay medium was exchanged to a medium that contained particulate matter (PM10


-like) to mimic


pollution stress. Protein carbonylation was measured as a marker for oxidative protein damage caused by pollution (Fig 4). N- Acetylcysteine served as a positive control. A significant reduction in carbonylated proteins in cells treated with 1% cress sprout extract was observed which showed that the extract protects cells from free radicals caused by particulate matter.


A smart polysaccharide complex to shield the skin from pollution particles The cress spout extract was sprayed on a


PERSONAL CARE EUROPE


3. Artichoke extract: Protection of DNA from epigenetic changes


Figure 7: Triple action against pollution.


carrier that is based on a mixture of different polysaccharides [Depolluphane (INCI: Lepidium sativum sprout extract and Pullulan and Sodium Carboxymethyl Betaglucan and Caesalpinia Spinosa Gum and Maltodextrin and Aqua)]. This smart polysaccharide complex performs various functions on the skin: l The film-forming capability of the complex shields the skin from unwanted exposure to pollutants


l The biochemical activity of the complex enhances the skin’s immune function and helps to strengthen the skin barrier. The shielding effect of the polysaccharide complex with the encapsulated cress sprout extract was tested in a clinical study. Twenty-one women aged between 20 and 44 years (average age: 31 years) received a standardised single application of a cream containing 2% complex and the corresponding placebo cream in distinct 4x4 cm zones on their forearms. 20 minutes after product application, microparticles that modelled atmospheric pollution (1 µm on average) were applied to the forearm in the 2% complex and placebo-treated zones as well as to a non-treated zone as a negative control. The rinsing of the forearm was performed by spreading a standardised amount of water on the forearm and wiping each zone three times with a dry cotton pad. Pictures of the defined zones were taken with a Hirox video microscope before and after the rinsing of the microparticles. Representative images of the average


effect showed that the microparticles were more efficiently rinsed off in the zones that were pretreated with 2% complex (Fig 5). The pictures were also quantified by image analysis. The surface (in pixels) covered by the microparticles was measured before and after rinsing, and compared to the non-treated


zone. Results showed that a single treatment with 2 % complex resulted in a significantly more efficient removal of microparticles compared to the non-treated zone as well as the placebo treated zone (Fig 6).


Conclusion For complete protection of the skin against pollution, a cosmetic ingredient was developed based on two plant extracts, cress sprouts and artichoke which were encapsulated into a smart polysaccharide complex [Depolluphane EpiPlus (INCI: Lepidium Sativum Sprout Extract and Cynara Scolymus Leaf Extract and Pullulan and Sodium Carboxymethyl Betaglucan and Caesalpinia Spinosa Gum and Maltodextrin and Aqua)]. This new cosmetic active protects the skin from urban pollution in a threefold manner over the course of three distinct timelines (Fig 7): l Immediately shields the skin against particulate matter


l In the short-term fortifies the skin’s own defense mechanism by activating detoxification enzymes


l In the long-term protects the skin by preventing epigenetic changes that are caused by pollution.


References 1 Breton CV and Marutani AN. Air Pollution and


Epigenetics: Recent Findings. Curr Envir Health Rpt 2014; 1: 35-45 (2014)


2 Ding R, Jin Y, Liu X, Zhu Z, Zhang Y, Wang T, Xu Y. H3K9 acetylation change patterns in rats after exposure to traffic-related air pollution. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology 2016; 42: 170-175


3 Cantone L, Nordio F, Hou L, et al. Inhalable Metal-rich Air Particles and Histone H3K4 Dimethylation and H3K9 Acetylation in a Cross- sectional Study of Steel Workers. Environmental Health Perspectives 2011; 119: 964-969.


November 2018


Decrease in particle quantitiy after rinsing compared to non-treated zone in %


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104