search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
12 TESTING


tested this product on an animal and we got this result,” but there is no factor or ratio that can then tell you how a test on animal cells will relate to humans. You can place a known irritant into a rabbit’s eye to time the redness and tearing effect and compare it with your own. The known irritant might take 5 minutes and ours might take half an hour, but you don’t really know whether it is safe or not.


What may have happened would have been a number of other products may have been tested in the past and the data for them all said half an hour and they all sold without any issues then you get a level of comfort but you get nothing like the level of data as you do with the new tests. And the fact remains that animal cells are different.


One of the big challenges the industry is having with validating alternatives to animal testing is invariably what the regulators do is say “Well if you come up with a new test on, [for example], skin cells, we will need to validate it against the data we’ve already got”. And what you’re doing here is validating data against non-robust data.


I think you adopt the technology that exists at the time and it almost becomes a hygiene level. People assume that everyone is doing it, so they should do it. But times have changed now and the technology around to be able to harvest and grow skin cells, keep them alive and see how they react to chemicals, and to be able to quantitatively assess that, it gives us an amazing level of data. And there is a robustness to the validation work when developing test methods as well. You are asking a number of laboratories around the world to conduct the same test, with the same materials all issued by the same company, and it is a cross-validation. So I know that to a certain extent I could come to XCellR8 and then go to another laboratory that was using the same methods and the same protocols, the result would be the same. PC: What other formulation challenges do you face getting new products to market currently? JM: As with many things it’s differentiating yourself in the marketplace. We have a finite number of raw materials that we can use, and depending on where you are selling your cosmetics as well – that puts some restrictions on the types of ingredients you can use.


As The Body Shop, we have products in 69 countries around the world and what we do is actively force ourselves to use the most stringent regulations in any of those markets. So, we take the European regulations, the US regulations, the Japanese regulations, the Korean regulations and we throw them into a big


PERSONAL CARE EUROPE


bucket and if any of those regulatory bodies have rules and restrictions, we apply that to every single product, whether it’s being launched in that market or not. The view is that there is scientific evidence there that has made someone look up and make a decision.


The other challenge is that as a business


there are certain ingredients we won’t use because of our position on animal testing. We have a very strict position on the fact we don’t want to use commercial materials that have been tested on animals, so we’re actively putting ourselves at a disadvantage. However that’s the price we pay for having a very strong position since the 1980s on animal testing, and will continue to have through pushing for the UN to have the ban, and also through not going into China unless it is clear that our cruelty-free status could be maintained. And to be fair to China they are working fairly hard on it at the moment and we’ve seen some changes in the regulations in the last couple of years. PC:We hear much about how consumers are becoming more ‘ingredient conscious’. As The Body Shop has always marketed to ingredient savvy consumers, do you feel you have held an advantage here, or have you also noticed a change? JM: I think at The Body Shop, we’ve always attracted ingredient conscious consumers.


This is why we launched our Forever Against Animal Testing campaign to demonstrate the appetite for cruelty free cosmetics.


This move towards vegetarianism and veganism more recently in the marketplace is a part of people being more conscious of what they are consuming, certainly from the food perspective, but now we are seeing it more in cosmetics. We are getting more demand for vegan products – for us it’s a hygiene level that you should be a vegetarian brand, and that goes through not just our products but also our accessories. So where we’re making makeup brushes we’re making sure we’re using artificial hairs. PC: And what is The Body Shop’s position on lanolin? JM: It is something we have used in the past but we don’t use it anymore. The problem with lanolin is that in order to keep sheep in good condition, farmers will put them through sheep dip, obviously to make sure there are no parasites, etc. And that sheep dip is ultimately a pesticidal solution. When you shear in order to extract the


lanolin from the wool you end up pulling some of those pesticides through. Lanolin is quite widely used, in the pharmaceutical industry especially, and we have used it in the past because it does have some unique properties but we’ve found enough


November 2018


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104