search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
72 MARINE INGREDIENTS


RHE for 18 hours. The viability of tissues was evaluated by a MTT test, and the inflammatory response was assessed by interleukin 1 alpha (IL- 1a) release. The inflammatory response (IR) was expressed as: IR = IL-1a (treated) / IL-1a (negative control) No significant cytotoxicity (tissue


viability=99%) was recorded after topical application ofNannochloropsis extract (Figure 10). Under the same experimental conditions, 0.5% of SLS solution induced a complete mortality of tissues, as well as with LA (viability 9%).


This result demonstrates the increased


sensitivity of immature RHE, since the viability of standard mature RHE, treated with LA, is always ≥60%. The Nannochloropsis extract is totally non-cytotoxic on a baby skin model. Results evidenced that the inflammatory


response (IR) of tissues treated with the Nannochloropsis extract (IR=2) was not or only weakly modified compared to negative control tissues (IR=1), this difference is not significant (Figure 11). The topical application of LA induced a slight


increase of the inflammatory response of tissues (IR=7). The topical application of SDS (0.5%) induced a maximal IL-1a release, related to the drastic reduction of tissue viability. To be considered of good tolerance on baby


skin, the tested item should answer to both criteria : good cell viability and no inflammatory response. In this evaluation, the Nannochloropsis extract was compared to two well-known irritant positive control: SLS, for mature epidermis, and LA, for immature epidermis. The Nannochloropsis extract is considered as a non-inflammatory ingredient with an excellent cell viability, perfectly safe to be used on baby skin. Based on the results obtained, the Nannochloropsis extract has a good tolerance on baby skin.


Conclusion Natura-Tec Marine OceanMist CL™ offers a sustainable solution, ideally suited to the health and wellbeing of the diversity of delicate skins, helping us meet the criteria of modern life on our planet. Natura-Tec aims to respect nature at all levels of our ecosystem, with a natural, sustainable, and holistic approach of protection. We care to protect the environment by


reducing our carbon footprint with investments in earth-friendly technologies, that produces oxygen, without waste and without harming the planet. By protecting the environment, we protect human beings, improving their living conditions. Furthermore, as regards the cosmetic industry,


we care to protect our body whilst enhancing its natural beauty and respecting the uniqueness of each skin.


References 1. Nakatsuji T, Gallo RL. The role of the skin microbiome in atopic dermatitis. CME Review. 2019; vol. 122, issue 3, p.263-269


2. Nguyen MT, Hanzelmann D, Härtner T, Peschel A, Götz F. Skin-Specific Unsaturated Fatty Acids Boost the Staphylococcus aureus Innate Immune Response. Infect. Immun. 2015; Oct 26;84(1):205-15


PERSONAL CARE May 2024 PC


100 80 60 40 20 0


100 99


9 1 Untreated


Nannochloropsis extract


Figure 10: Cell viability measurement by a MTT assay 1000 234 100 Linalyl Acetate


Sodium Lauryl Sulfate


10 1 1 Untreated


Nannochloropsis extract


3. Townsend EC, Kalan LR. The dynamic balance of the skin microbiome across the lifespan. Biochemical Society Transactions. 2023; 51 (1), p71–86


4. Seité S. Skin sensitivity and skin microbiota: Is there a link? Experimental Dermatology.


Linalyl Acetate Figure 11: Inflammatory response of the immature epidermis 2018;27:1061–1064


5. Prescott et al. The skin microbiome: impact of modern environments on skin ecology, barrier integrity, and systemic immune programming. World Allergy Organization Journal. 2017; 10:29


www.personalcaremagazine.com


Sodium Lauryl Sulfate


2


7


Inflammatory response of tissues


RHE viability (%)


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92