search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
COLOUR COSMETICS


23


Figure 3: Satisfaction gaps - colour cosmetics


satisfaction gaps are revealed. These gaps showcase the product features they expect cosmetics brands to improve. Overall, global consumers are not satisfied


with the long wear attributes of their colour cosmetics and these gaps are most prominent in liquid foundation. Almost seven out of ten global consumers


(69%) wear liquid foundation regularly and usage rates are consistent across generational groups. However, the generational cohorts differ in the types of satisfaction gaps they experience and in the significance of their gaps, proving that liquid foundation products that target unique consumer segments are necessary to meet consumer needs. Each generational group experiences


dissatisfaction with the long wear attributes of liquid foundation as seen in Figure 4. Yet it is Gen Z consumers (ages 16-26) who have the most significant long wear gap. In addition to expecting better long wear


attributes, baby boomers (ages 59-70) are equally dissatisfied with the coverage of liquid foundation. Millennials (ages 27-42) experience a unique satisfaction gap with the optical effects of liquid foundation products. Brands are offering more products with


enhanced optical effects. The research from this study confirms that consumers have significant interest in this feature. Among global consumers, blurring, soft focus, and other optical effects are not the exclusive desire of older consumers. Younger cohorts also put high importance


on these features and report satisfaction gaps. Figure 4 shows that Millennials (ages 27-42) have the highest satisfaction gap for this feature in liquid foundation. Regionally, consumers in the United


Kingdom (-15 pts.), Germany (-10 pts.), and Brazil (-8 pts.) also experience significant satisfaction gaps in the optical effects of liquid


www.personalcaremagazine.com Figure 4: Satisfaction Gaps – liquid foundation May 2024 PERSONAL CARE


foundation. The data from these consumer groups show that brands who offer products with improved performance for blurring, soft focus, visible wrinkle reduction and visibly smaller pores can win loyalty from consumers. General conclusions on consumer


satisfaction gaps point to larger trends worth noting. Among the generational groups, it is baby boomers (ages 59-70) who experience the most and the highest satisfaction gaps across all product categories. This underserved cohort has unique needs,


and they spend more per piece on colour cosmetics than younger generations. For brands looking to grow their engagement with Baby Boomers, they expect brands to use more clean and naturally derived ingredients in their colour cosmetics products. A regional difference of note is among


consumers in Brazil. Compared to other countries, they experience the most and the


highest satisfaction gaps in liquid foundation. In addition to closing significant gaps for long wear and coverage, they too seek products using more clean and naturally derived ingredients. They expect liquid foundation products to deliver on both performance and sustainability. As brands monitor the purchase drivers


and satisfaction of their consumers, they will uncover unique formulation opportunities. Formulating to improve the performance features consumers care about the most is crucial. Leveraging the formulation process to offer consumers the sustainability benefits they want is a way for brands to differentiate.


Sustainability defined It is important for suppliers, brands, retailers, and influencers across the colour cosmetics value chain to understand how consumers define sustainability. Their definitions and opinions can be a roadmap to formulate


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92