search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
46 FUNCTIONAL INGREDIENTS


TABLE 1: WATER HOLD PROPERTY IS A MEASURE OF THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF WATER THAT CAN BE ABSORBED PER GRAM OF EMOLLIENT


Oil type Ester Material EXCEPARL IS-CE-A


Cholesteryl Isostearate Isopropyl Myristate


Octyldodecyl Myristate


Hydrocarbon Liquid paraffin Squalane


Thiethylhexanoin Triglyceride


Captylic/Capric Triglyceride


Monoglyceride Glyceryl Stearate Water hold %


>300 14


53 13 14


29 32


175 In contrast, skin surfaces with pathological


lesions present dry and scaly alterations, and the stratum corneum exhibits poor barrier function. The water-retaining capacity of the stratum corneum is quantitatively evaluated by measuring skin conductance.2 Figure 3 illustrates the moisturising efficacy


of Cholesteryl Isostearate at two concentration levels compared to a W/O emulsion (blank) without the compound, applying the same amount to the respective skin areas and conducting the measurements at one and two days of application. The skin reaction, including scaling, was assessed three days after acetone/ether treatment under the same conditions as the conductance measurements. Scaling was scored as follows: 0 = no scaling, 1 = slight scaling, 2 = moderate scaling, and 3 = marked scaling. Topical applications of 0.3-1% Cholesteryl


Isostearate in a W/O cream to acetone/ether induced dry skin produced significant recovery of the water-retaining properties, associated with improvement in scaling, versus the results obtained with the base cream.


Repairing effect The repairing effect of the Cholesteryl Isostearate ingredient in a cosmetic formula was assessed by the effect upon transepidermal water loss and skin elasticity of a cosmetic product containing 1% Cholesteryl Isostearate versus placebo. Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) of the


products was assessed with a Tewameter device at different experimental times, before and after using the test products. The results were expressed in grams of evaporated water per


0% -5%


-10% -15%


-18% *


-20% *Significant differences (ANOVA-1way: p<0.05 Figure 4: Effect on transepidermal water loss PERSONAL CARE March 2024 Figure 5: Effect on skin elasticity www.personalcaremagazine.com


25 20 15 10 5 0


Before damage


Day 0


Higher moisture retention


Cream (blank) ■ Cream (0.3%) ■ Cream (1%) ■ 3 2 1


Lower skin damage


0


Day 1


Day 2


Before damage


Day 0


Day 1


Day 2


Figure 3: Recovery of skin moisture and damage after artificial exposure using acetone/ether and application of W/O cream containing Cholesteryl Isostearate cream (blank): 2% Isosterayl Glyceryl Ether, 3% Petrolatum, 5% Squalane and 10% Octyl-Dodecyl Myristate


TABLE 2: TEST COMPOSITION OF O/W EMULSIONS WITH AND WITHOUT CHOLESTERYL ISOSTEARATE Placebo 5% 4% 5% 0


1%


Emulsifier system Consistency factor Emollient system Active Others Water


Polysorbate-60 + Sorbitan Monooleate Cetearyl Alcohol


Capric/Caprylic Triglyceride Cholesteryl Iostearate Preservative


Deionized water square metre of surface and per hour (g/m2 /h).


The principle underlying measurement is based on Fick’s diffusion law. The determination of vapour flow in the air indirectly measures flow through the skin: a digital display continuously reflects the quantity of evaporated water expressed in g/m2


/h. Skin elasticity was assessed by measuring


the extensibility and elasticity of the skin with a Cutometer, before and after treatment. Skin elasticity is assessed by measuring


its capacity to return to its initial state after undergoing deformation under partial vacuum. The results are expressed as the ratio of elastic recovery to total deformation (Ur/Uf). The greater the percentage recovery versus deformation, the better. The measurements were made on the


Placebo ■ 1% EXCEPARL IS-CE-A ■ -3%


4% 3% 2% 1% 0%


0.5% up to 100%


5% 4% 5% 1%


0.5% up to 100%


placebo control and treated areas before and after 24 hours (single application), and 14 and 28 days after application of the products. The cosmetic products tested were O/W emulsions with and without Cholesteryl Isostearate, a biomimetic skin lipid (Table 2). This study was conducted by Eurofins Product Testing, Cosmetics & Personal Care Spain, S.L.U.


Effect on transepidermal water loss (TEWL) The cosmetic product containing 1% Cholesteryl Isostearate significantly improved skin barrier function up to 24 hours after a first single application (signed rank test for paired samples).


The positive effect of Cholesteryl Isostearate on skin barrier function was also observed after 14 and 28 days of application.


Placebo ■ 1% EXCEPARL IS-CE-A ■


28 days *Significant differences (ANOVA-1way: p<0.05


% TEWL readings-Baseline


Skin Conductance (µΩ-1)


% readings-Baseline


Scaling rash score


*


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112