This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Page 60


www.us- tech.com


February, 2017


How to Properly Calculate Reflow Temperature Gradients


By Vitor Barros, General Manager, KIC Europe T


he theory is simple: Process electronic assemblies in spec every time and the result is a quality product. In practice, however,


this is much more difficult for numerous reasons, including normal and abnormal process variations, human error, and many other factors. First, let’s be clear about what the process


specifications actually are. Critical components such as LEDs, crystals, bottom-terminated compo- nents (BTC), including micro-BGAs and oth- ers, have very specific process limits that can be challenging to achieve and can be devastat- ing when ignored. Electronics manufacturers must fully understand the nomenclature and process window definitions before setting up their assembly machines. For example, max rising and falling slope limits during PCB reflow are a common source of misunder- standing and process failure.


The Devil’s in the Details Take an LED component for example,


and note that the terms slope and gradient may be used interchangeably. A typical reflow process window or process limits for such a component may appear relatively straightfor- ward, but the downside of getting it wrong is sig- nificant. First, a definition of a temperature slope: the rate of temperature change with distance or time. In a thermal profile, this will be measured in degrees Celsius or Kelvin (°C or K) per second. A common mistake is to calculate max rising


and falling temperature gradients as a linear measurement from the start of the profile to the peak temperature, and from the peak temperature


Example of thermal process specifications for an LED component.


need one more specification, the distance or time over which the slope will be measured. Reading the fine print in the LED component spec limits we might find something like the following: Max ris- ing slope to be measured over 10-second intervals. To calculate the max rising slope for the LED


component we need to measure each 10-second slope along the profile from the beginning to peak temperature. To do that we select the profile tem-


to the end of the profile. These calculations are misleading and result in slope profile inaccuracies because they average together all of the various slope calculations along the entire profile. This brings to mind an old joke about a statistician, with his head in the oven and feet in the refrigera- tor, who stated that the average temperature was comfortable. To find the correct measurement of a slope we


perature at 10 seconds, subtract the temperature at 0 seconds, and divide by 10 seconds. Next, we calculate the profile temperature at 11 seconds, subtracting the temperature at 1 second and divide by 10 seconds and so forth. The calculations will continue in one-second increments until the peak.


Finally, the highest number of all these calcu-


lations represents max rising slope. You will find that the 10-second max gradient measure- ment is significantly higher than the aver- age gradient. Similar calculations will be made on the falling slope, but the component supplier will likely specify a different accept- able limit along with new calculation guide- lines. The cooling section of the profile has a shorter duration and may be susceptible to more volatile temperature variations. The component specifications may call for max falling slope measurements over a 5-second interval instead.


Approaches to Slope Calculation The use of average instead of max slope


calculations will be misleading, and it risks component damage. What makes this partic-


ularly worrisome is that stressing LEDs or other optoelectronic and electronic components may introduce latent defects that enable the PCB to pass the factory’s quality inspection, but go on to fail prematurely when in use. This may seem very complicated, but with


today’s profiling software it is straightforward. The calculations are made in just a fraction a sec-


Continued on page 66 Tailored To Fit


Huge Savings On Microscope and Video Inspection Systems!


Video Inspection Systems starting at $595


Microscope Systems starting at $350


While


Supplies Last


Take A Closer Look @ email: sales@aventools.com aventools.com See at APEX, Booth 2217 and at ATX West, Booth 4271 phone: 734-973-0099


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124