search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
TESTING


feeling to the touch.12 18-MEA can be easily removed from the


hair surface due to different damaging agents, therefore, the degree of 18-MEA degradation can be used to gauge damage to hair fibres. Taking this into consideration, ToF-SIMS is a valuable tool to substantiate claims, as it is possible to infer the efficacy of hair care products on damage repair or damage protection, when analyses on the 18-MEA degradation are performed.


Optical profilometry to evaluate the hair damage Optical profilometry is a rapid, non-destructive and noncontact surface metrology technique. Optical profilometry quantifies and qualifies the relative contribution of different characteristics of a samples’ surface, such as structure, waviness, roughness, volume, and others, by the production of a detailed three-dimensional surface map of a test surface. Therefore, this technique not only allows


to obtain high resolution images of the samples’ surface, but also quantifies various topographical characteristics.13


The damage


induced by heat and by discoloration can be analysed with this technique (Figure 2) since if the hair suffers damage, the hair surface becomes more irregular and causes an increase of the surface roughness.


Split ends evaluation through Brightfield microscope and clinical score Split ends develop when the structure of the hair weakens from injury, particularly mechanical and chemical damage, causing the longitudinal rupture of the hair shaft.14 Due to being a result of an excessive and continuous damage, hair tresses are submitted to a thermal/mechanical stress prior to the performing of the tests, in order to induce the formation of split ends. Therefore, a thermal/mechanical apparatus (Figure 3) is established. This apparatus consists


Figure 3: Thermal/mechanical apparatus


of one plastic brush attached to a cylindrical arm that has an engine and is made to rotate at 60 rpm through the hair tress in a horizontal position. Simultaneously, the hair tress is exposed


to the hot air of a blow dryer during rotation, which is positioned to keep the hair against the brush. The hair tress is exposed to this thermal/ mechanical stress for two hours at 60 rpm - this treatment corresponds to approximately 3,600 brush strokes per hour and simulates what a consumer does during the styling process. The hair split ends evaluation is assessed by


one expert in standardised lighting and position conditions, in previously damaged hair tresses, by the assignment of a visual score, taking into account the tress split ends cover area observed, using a visual score scale. After visual score assignment, hair fibres


are collected and the split ends area is visualized with a Brightfield microscope in order to visualize the extension of the damage, and photographs are captured so that representative images (Figure 4) of the assigned score are obtained. When a claim substantiation on a hair care


product is sought, split ends are analysed after products’ application (Figure 5) in order to assess on the mending effect of the product.


Hair strength evaluation with texturometer As previously referred, the hair is easily damaged by a variety of agents, such as exposure to chemicals, colouring and environment or daily hair drying that weaken the hair by increasing inter-fibre friction, leading to breakage.


81


Figure 4: Images obtained with a Brightfield microscope of split ends of a damaged hair tress before product application


Figure 5: Images obtained with a Brightfield microscope of mended split ends of a damaged hair tress after a single product application www.personalcaremagazine.com October 2022 PERSONAL CARE


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108