search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
SKIN BARRIER


No. SAB4200794, Sigma Aldrich, USA) was assessed by immunohistochemistry staining. Quantification of involucrin was performed with Image J (NIH, USA) using customized plugins and filters.


Clinical study To evaluate the clinical efficacy of the Ca2


+


vector system, a double blinded randomized and placebo-controlled study was performed. 20 female volunteers aged 23 to 65 years (mean 42.2 years) with normal skin (Fitzpatrick II to III) were included. The study involved two parts, evaluating


both the protective and regenerative effects of the Ca2


+ vector system (2%, formulated into a


gel emulsion) prior to/after 2% sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) stress using occlusive patches (Finn Chamber Large®, SmartPractice, Germany). For the protection phase, the application of the test products (2% Ca2


+ vector system and


placebo gel control) twice daily in one area, randomly selected (test area), for seven days followed by a challenge with SLS in three areas (untreated, 2% Ca2


+ vector system and placebo


creme control) and evaluation of the skin effects until complete recovery. For the regeneration phase, challenge with SLS in three areas (untreated, 2% Ca2


+


vector system and placebo creme control) was followed by the twice daily application of the test product in one area randomly selected (test area) and placebo in another area (control area), and evaluation of the skin effects until recovery of the three areas. The skin parameters were measured at


baseline, 24 hours after stress and every two to three days until recovery. Parameters measured were skin microcirculation (Periflux PF5000, Perimed, Sweden), skin redness (Chromameter® CR-400, Minolta, Japan), and trans-epidermal water loss (TEWL, Tewameter® TM300, Courage +Khazaka, Germany).


Results and discussion The mixing of negatively charged phospholipids with Ca2


resulted in a supramolecular nanocochleate + ions by high pressure homogenization B Reduced calcium (0.3 mM calcium basal) D Reduced calcium (0.3 mM calcium basal) +0.1 % Ca2 + vector system


Figure 3: Rescuing of RHE stratification with the Ca2+ o


A Loricrin expression Control (1.1 mM calcium basal) vector system C Reduced calcium (0.3 mM calcium basal) +1.1 mM CaCI2 B Reduced calcium (0.3 mM calcium basal) D Reduced calcium (0.3 mM calcium basal) +0.1 % Ca2 + vector system A Control (1.1 mM calcium basal) C Reduced calcium (0.3 mM calcium basal) +1.1 mM CaCI2


31


Figure 4: Ca2


+ vector system increases the expression of loricrin


with a double cone structure (Figure 2A). This structure, resembling a snail shell (cochlea is Greek for snail), was firstly described by Papahadjopoulas et al. in 1975,8


+ ions, and we further


confirmed it by our own images taken with FFTEM (Figure 2B). Such an encapsulation technology can make impermeable molecules, such as Ca2


bioavailable to tissues, including the skin.9 The effect of this Ca2


+ delivery system on


epidermal differentiation was then investigated in vitro in RHE. The RHE grown in standard


conditions (1.1 mM calcium basal) formed all stratified layers of the epidermis (basal, squamous, granular and cornified) (Figure 3A) with well-established loricrin expression (Figure 4A). Reducing calcium levels during the


differentiation process to 0.3 mM basal calcium, mimicking a very aged or diabetic skin, strongly impaired the formation of a dense, stratified epidermis and led to the formation of vacuoles (Figure 3B). Treating the differentiating keratinocytes with 1.1 mM CaCl2


from the apical side could not restore a functional differentiation


www.personalcaremagazine.com


October 2022 PERSONAL CARE


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108