search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Te system ingests all the betting data, and the AI model is there to identify suspicious betting activities - be it pre-match markets with a large odds change, increased turnover on a certain betting market, or in live betting markets, increased turnover or odds deviation from expected levels. Te AI and alerting system are there to essentially flag out matches that require further human analysis.


Different markets are popular in football and basketball, volleyball and tennis. Te AI model is there to help ensure each sport is monitored in a way that's related to how it's previously been manipulated because the machine learning model is continually learning from our human assessment. Tat's the dataset it works with so it's able to make sure that each sport is being judged based on the individual risk factors that have been seen in the past. Tat is one of the biggest advantages in the model - that it's able to differentiate between different sports - and one of the great benefits of Sportradar acting as a data provider and ecosystem means we have access to large data sources on a broad range of sports. Tis gives us the ability to look at each sport in an individual manner.


We have teams of analysts dedicated to certain sports. To address your question, yes, each sport gets its own kind of attention but because it learns from human behaviour and our previous classifications of matches. For sports like football and basketball where there has been a higher number of suspicious matches recorded previously, naturally the system is better equipped because it's got a greater pool of data to work with.


You’ve spoken on Sportradar's role in determining and then validating legitimate betting from suspicious betting. What about the enforcement action?


Tere are three different areas Sportradar supports. Te first is prevention and we have well-equipped integrity education and prevention teams. Tese are people who've come from an education background, and they've got tailored material to help players, referees


JACK KENNEDY VP Anti-Match-Fixing Sportradar


or any stakeholders in the sport recognise match-fixing approaches and how to report it which is often not as easy as it sounds. Ten there is the detection component, and this is where the UFDS comes in. When the system flags up strong betting, an analyst will conduct an initial review. If they can't see any immediate factors to determine why the strong getting activity is in place, we'll do further research, and the data gets validated by a team within Sportradar. Tis is to ensure that the goal times are accurate, the system has correctly recorded any red cards, and so on. Ten a request is sent out to a local expert with a list of questions that gives our team of analysts all available information. For instance, were there any local rumours? Was there any extra team news before the match? Often there is stuff talked about on local radio that is difficult for analysts to find from the desk. Tis next set of questions is run through and once the data has been validated and checked, they'll collectively come to a decision about whether the betting activity is explainable by reasonable factors.


We have a high threshold, so we look at every betting activity in multiple ways to ensure that there is no legitimate reason for the betting activity. Once that threshold is hit a report is sent to the relevant sporting federation and outlining the betting markets targeted, why we determine the betting activity to be irregular and various other different factors. It is also listed in a data appendix - things like the league table, a glossary of betting terms and any previous suspicions of the teams or players involved. Tis report contains information for federations to undertake their own action and the approach here has been validated by the Court of Arbitration for Sport. Ten I come onto the third pillar – action. Within our anti-


123


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212  |  Page 213  |  Page 214  |  Page 215  |  Page 216  |  Page 217  |  Page 218  |  Page 219  |  Page 220  |  Page 221  |  Page 222  |  Page 223  |  Page 224  |  Page 225  |  Page 226  |  Page 227  |  Page 228  |  Page 229  |  Page 230  |  Page 231  |  Page 232  |  Page 233  |  Page 234  |  Page 235  |  Page 236  |  Page 237  |  Page 238  |  Page 239  |  Page 240  |  Page 241  |  Page 242  |  Page 243  |  Page 244  |  Page 245  |  Page 246  |  Page 247  |  Page 248  |  Page 249  |  Page 250  |  Page 251  |  Page 252